Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4
-
Too much simulation that has an influence in games is why I quit playing online.
-
I can't believe people are looking back at 17 like it was a great game, do you not remember all the complaints about the hitting? Just late timing being WAY better than good timing, one-handed swings generating top spin on everything, the new ball physics that ruined the hitting engine...
-
@JFazNYY13 said in Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4:
I can't believe people are looking back at 17 like it was a great game, do you not remember all the complaints about the hitting? Just late timing being WAY better than good timing, one-handed swings generating top spin on everything, the new ball physics that ruined the hitting engine...
I played it enough recently to know it felt better than any of the recent titles.
-
@Ikasnu said in Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4:
@JFazNYY13 said in Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4:
I can't believe people are looking back at 17 like it was a great game, do you not remember all the complaints about the hitting? Just late timing being WAY better than good timing, one-handed swings generating top spin on everything, the new ball physics that ruined the hitting engine...
I played it enough recently to know it felt better than any of the recent titles.
No way, awful take lmao.
-
I would judge this game after it’s life cycle, like around December. If everyone forgot, 19 was not that great the first 2 months or so, players did not catch balls on the warning track, hung pitches were always an issue, and the HR/9 screwed a lot of people over until they took it out of online play. Also on 19 they had to turn off the wind. Every game has it’s issue, but to say this is the worst out of them all is a far stretch considering that it has not been through it’s life cycle yet.
-
@JFazNYY13 said in Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4:
@Ikasnu said in Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4:
@JFazNYY13 said in Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4:
I can't believe people are looking back at 17 like it was a great game, do you not remember all the complaints about the hitting? Just late timing being WAY better than good timing, one-handed swings generating top spin on everything, the new ball physics that ruined the hitting engine...
I played it enough recently to know it felt better than any of the recent titles.
No way, awful take lmao.
That's just like, your opinion man.
-
I think we’re forgetting that the game is still just 6 weeks old. Because of the plague, a lot of us are playing way more than we normally would so it may feel like the game is much more mature than it is. Give the game a few more months before trying to rank it against games we played for a full year (and that had 30+ patches).
-
@JFazNYY13 said in Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4:
I can't believe people are looking back at 17 like it was a great game, do you not remember all the complaints about the hitting? Just late timing being WAY better than good timing, one-handed swings generating top spin on everything, the new ball physics that ruined the hitting engine...
Yes There’s was flaws but that game had me coming back everyday. The first year Griffey was in the game, they rewarded you with stubs the more you played and cumulated stats. First year of events and they actually gave you worth while cards. 17 was content was special.
-
17 was by far the best version gameplay even with the just late hitting. 19 was best for content but I’m sure 20 will be better. But that’s how they cover up the gameplay issues, they pretty it up with content. I do not expect this to change.
-
@SchnauzerFace said in Ranking MLB The show year to year on PS4:
I think we’re forgetting that the game is still just 6 weeks old. Because of the plague, a lot of us are playing way more than we normally would so it may feel like the game is much more mature than it is. Give the game a few more months before trying to rank it against games we played for a full year (and that had 30+ patches).
they stop gameplay patches at the end of June so they are half way through their "patch cycle" and so far it has been nothing but fixing fielding and reverting what was a well liked hitting engine. I am certain that hitting is where they want it which is why it hasn't been addressed in 5 weeks
-
Great post my man. I started playing in 16 and loved diamond dynasty. I truly felt like it rewarded the better player. I sucked and I lost a bunch, but it motivated me to put more time into the game and I improved my skills.
The Show 17 was overall a great game. The just late/be great meta was somewhat annoying, but I would take that game over what we have now every day of the week.
The Show 18 was the beginning of the downfall, when SDS started catering to the casual player and leaving us competitive players out to dry.
Last year's game was a step up from 18 for sure. The lineouts were annoying, but at least we weren't playing slow pitch softball.
What p*sses me off the most with this year's game is that they got it right and then completely went back on their word and made it an RNG fest. The first week of The Show 20 was the best Show game I have ever played. It truly rewarded user skill more than any previous iteration of the game. But then they decided the casuals weren't winning enough, so they went back to their old ways and made it more random so the lesser player comes out on top more often. Which I understand, money is king. But it just sucks knowing that SDS is capable of putting out a good product and they actively choose not to
-
Considering both this year and last year were SO promising in the alpha/beta and both got patched to nerf hitting about ten days in, it sort of seems like what WE think is a good game and what SDS thinks is a good game are actually quite different.
We’re any of you thinking, “Geez, my batting average online is really unrealistic right now”?
-
A admin locked this topic on
