Team affinity stage 2
-
Anyone else been really disappointed so far? Sure the cards stats are good, but the players are mostly unknown to people who aren’t fans of that specific team. Just been pretty bad so far
-
Me. I don’t like choice of gimenez for Mets
-
the only one I advent known so far was the blue jays one. only know mountcastle because I live in Baltimore
-
@Riican_2 said in Team affinity stage 2:
the only one I advent known so far was the blue jays one. only know mountcastle because I live in Baltimore
Where did you see the Mountcastle reveal? Being an O’s fan I’m pumped for that but can see how fans of ever other team may not know who he is.
-
@BmoreBirds_3 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@Riican_2 said in Team affinity stage 2:
the only one I advent known so far was the blue jays one. only know mountcastle because I live in Baltimore
Where did you see the Mountcastle reveal? Being an O’s fan I’m pumped for that but can see how fans of ever other team may not know who he is.
It’s on Twitter but yeah I think that’s how every teams gonna be. Just a bummer they used these cards as the team affinity not just a separate release
-
I like that they're doing something with Prospects and FS this year as opposed to throwing in like 8 of them last year. The FotF coming out first is a little curious to me, as I feel like if these FS cards came at release, then it would barely be noticed.
I'd love to see more content for my specific team, and doing things like TA is a good conduit for everyone of a specific fanbase, as well as a chance for outsider fans to learn about players they may or may not see in the future.
-
Jays for boned again.
-
@MarkDiF01 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@BmoreBirds_3 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@Riican_2 said in Team affinity stage 2:
the only one I advent known so far was the blue jays one. only know mountcastle because I live in Baltimore
Where did you see the Mountcastle reveal? Being an O’s fan I’m pumped for that but can see how fans of ever other team may not know who he is.
It’s on Twitter but yeah I think that’s how every teams gonna be. Just a bummer they used these cards as the team affinity not just a separate release
Ah I see it there. But yea other than Mountcastle, Hoerner was the only other one I recognized. And definitely agree there had to be a better way to roll these out.
-
I'm incredibly disappointed that Robert, Kelenic, Carlson, Rutschman, and Lux will all end up having worse cards than worse prospect counterparts on their own team
Hell, Franco might end up outclassed by some FS card on the Rays
I understand the difference between the card types, the top prospects should be the ones getting the juiced FS cards then
-
Do we know the Rockies?
-
SDS sure did F up big time.
Absolute screwups.
Be just as well having a room full of chimpanzees on coke hammering some keyboards.
-
@JustASeal0 said in Team affinity stage 2:
I'm incredibly disappointed that Robert, Kelenic, Carlson, Rutschman, and Lux will all end up having worse cards than worse prospect counterparts on their own team
Hell, Franco might end up outclassed by some FS card on the Rays
I understand the difference between the card types, the top prospects should be the ones getting the juiced FS cards then
I agree, these top 10-15 prospects should have better cards than guys like Mountcastle or Bohm. SDS has gone a complete different direction with these FS cards. Like last year once guys like Vladdy and Bichette got called up, then they got FS cards. I think releasing more of these prospects are fine but just make them Prospect series and have their attributes reflect where they currently rank as prospects.
-
@BmoreBirds_3 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@JustASeal0 said in Team affinity stage 2:
I'm incredibly disappointed that Robert, Kelenic, Carlson, Rutschman, and Lux will all end up having worse cards than worse prospect counterparts on their own team
Hell, Franco might end up outclassed by some FS card on the Rays
I understand the difference between the card types, the top prospects should be the ones getting the juiced FS cards then
I agree, these top 10-15 prospects should have better cards than guys like Mountcastle or Bohm. SDS has gone a complete different direction with these FS cards. Like last year once guys like Vladdy and Bichette got called up, then they got FS cards. I think releasing more of these prospects are fine but just make them Prospect series and have their attributes reflect where they currently rank as prospects.
This makes way too much sense for them.
The content team was supposed to be the bright spot, but so much for that I guess.
-
@nymets1987 said in Team affinity stage 2:
Me. I don’t like choice of gimenez for Mets
I haven’t see this, where was Gimenez confirmed?
-
@stewart1465 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@nymets1987 said in Team affinity stage 2:
Me. I don’t like choice of gimenez for Mets
I haven’t see this, where was Gimenez confirmed?
https://twitter.com/scuffymcgeetv/status/1252749231418494976
-
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@stewart1465 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@nymets1987 said in Team affinity stage 2:
Me. I don’t like choice of gimenez for Mets
I haven’t see this, where was Gimenez confirmed?
https://twitter.com/scuffymcgeetv/status/1252749231418494976
Thanks, at least they could have used our best SS prospect, guess he isn’t close enough to the majors. -
Are they going to release a thread with the players listed on it or do I have to search through random Twitch accts to find them?
-
Where are these listed? I do not want to scowl random scenaters accounts to find out
-
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@BmoreBirds_3 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@JustASeal0 said in Team affinity stage 2:
I'm incredibly disappointed that Robert, Kelenic, Carlson, Rutschman, and Lux will all end up having worse cards than worse prospect counterparts on their own team
Hell, Franco might end up outclassed by some FS card on the Rays
I understand the difference between the card types, the top prospects should be the ones getting the juiced FS cards then
I agree, these top 10-15 prospects should have better cards than guys like Mountcastle or Bohm. SDS has gone a complete different direction with these FS cards. Like last year once guys like Vladdy and Bichette got called up, then they got FS cards. I think releasing more of these prospects are fine but just make them Prospect series and have their attributes reflect where they currently rank as prospects.
This makes way too much sense for them.
The content team was supposed to be the bright spot, but so much for that I guess.
The only way to possibly make up for this is if there's some sort of elaborate way to get FS cards for like the top 20 prospects and idk how they'd do that without killing the meta
-
@JustASeal0 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@BmoreBirds_3 said in Team affinity stage 2:
@JustASeal0 said in Team affinity stage 2:
I'm incredibly disappointed that Robert, Kelenic, Carlson, Rutschman, and Lux will all end up having worse cards than worse prospect counterparts on their own team
Hell, Franco might end up outclassed by some FS card on the Rays
I understand the difference between the card types, the top prospects should be the ones getting the juiced FS cards then
I agree, these top 10-15 prospects should have better cards than guys like Mountcastle or Bohm. SDS has gone a complete different direction with these FS cards. Like last year once guys like Vladdy and Bichette got called up, then they got FS cards. I think releasing more of these prospects are fine but just make them Prospect series and have their attributes reflect where they currently rank as prospects.
This makes way too much sense for them.
The content team was supposed to be the bright spot, but so much for that I guess.
The only way to possibly make up for this is if there's some sort of elaborate way to get FS cards for like the top 20 prospects and idk how they'd do that without killing the meta
All I know is that the next stages need to be more interesting than a crappy Dane f’n Dunning.
