• Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
Skins
  • Default (The Show 25)
  • No Skin
  • The Show 23
  • Dark
  • The Show 24
  • The Show 25
Collapse
THESHOW.COM
Game Game Support Support My Account My Account

Community Forum

Players banned for cheating.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Diamond Dynasty
106 Posts 34 Posters 7.5k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #73

    @ncsauce_MLBTS hey again i didnt say it was ok what he said. SDS cannot ban someone for saying something they dont agree with in their stream. Thats the point. People dont have to watch and trust me they didnt. However banning someone from your game for what they say isnt right. Twitch ban...absolutely i get it.

    ncsauce_MLBTSN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ncsauce_MLBTSN Offline
    ncsauce_MLBTSN Offline
    ncsauce_MLBTS
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #74

    @LIONED-33_XBL Walk into any business and start insulting everyone there. Then cite policies when they tell you never to come back. Let us know how that goes for you

    LIONED 33_XBLL PriorFir4383355_XBLP LHUBison58_XBLL 3 Replies Last reply
    3
  • LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #75

    @ncsauce_MLBTS that's apples and oranges. You're missing the point. You keep arguing the emotional, feelings part of it. No where in the TOS does it say anything about people being banned for how they act on their stream. Here is the other thing. It doesn't matter as he's no longer around. He shouldn't be.

    ncsauce_MLBTSN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ncsauce_MLBTSN Offline
    ncsauce_MLBTSN Offline
    ncsauce_MLBTS
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #76

    @LIONED-33_XBL you’re missing common sense

    LIONED 33_XBLL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #77

    @ncsauce_MLBTS yeah, i figured you'd say something like that. dynamite comeback. good bye

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Sarge1387_PSNS Offline
    Sarge1387_PSNS Offline
    Sarge1387_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #78

    @sbchamps17_NSW said in Players banned for cheating.:

    Now he's threatening to sue SDS because of the ban even though he openly admitted to doing it on stream wheres there's proof

    That to me immediately indicates he's guilty AF, the fact he's threatening to sue. He violated the ToS in a major way, not just playing vs a bot...buh bye. He's cheesed his brand is shot, that's the only reason.

    LIONED 33_XBLL 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Sarge1387_PSNS Offline
    Sarge1387_PSNS Offline
    Sarge1387_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #79

    @x-814-x-MAFIA-x_PSN said in Players banned for cheating.:

    I just played an Event game where my opponent's pause timer counted down to '0', then 15 more seconds popped up. Then when he paused 2 batters later; it was up to 1:30.

    I've seen this a bunch of times...the counter is not supposed to be building up again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #80

    @Sarge1387_PSN yes thats the only reason...or it could be the majority of his money is from streaming MLB the show. Since they are banning him for something that is SDS's own issue, and he's not the only one btw. He has a strong case. Now if it comes out that there was something else...i'll back track my words...

    Sarge1387_PSNS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Sarge1387_PSNS Offline
    Sarge1387_PSNS Offline
    Sarge1387_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by Sarge1387_PSN
    #81

    or it could be the majority of his money is from streaming MLB the show.

    Literally what I just said, his brand is shot.

    He has a strong case

    365 Day bans aren't handed out for just boosting vs a bot. He has zero case right now, there's more at play here. His lawyer is laughing all the way to the bank.

    LIONED 33_XBLL 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #82

    @Sarge1387_PSN again if there is more, i'll 100% eat crow...but if there is not. He has a strong case.

    Sarge1387_PSNS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Sarge1387_PSNS Offline
    Sarge1387_PSNS Offline
    Sarge1387_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by Sarge1387_PSN
    #83

    @LIONED-33_XBL said in Players banned for cheating.:

    He has a strong case.

    I mean, no he doesn't. He violated ToS in some major way...he 100% doesn't right now.

    I'll agree to respectfully disagree here until further info is revealed, and like you I'll admit if I was wrong.

    LIONED 33_XBLL 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #84

    @Sarge1387_PSN hey I'm good with that. Sad part is i think we will always respectfully disagree. No way SDS or Frostie get deeper publicly than what's already been said.

    Sarge1387_PSNS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • PriorFir4383355_XBLP Offline
    PriorFir4383355_XBLP Offline
    PriorFir4383355_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #85

    @ncsauce_MLBTS said in Players banned for cheating.:

    @LIONED-33_XBL Walk into any business and start insulting everyone there. Then cite policies when they tell you never to come back. Let us know how that goes for you

    That's not at all a reasonable comparison. In fact, a far more reasonable comparison is for a customer in a shop to feel they were mistreated and start complaining, and then the store manager calls the cops to have the customer arrested. When the dust settles, all it was about was someone getting an order wrong and the customer asking for it to be fixed. You abuse a paying customer in that manner and you're soon going out of business.

    SDS needs to parse the distinction between people being rude versus people who are angry over poor customer services, which in the case of SDS has sometimes veered into the territory of malicious customer service -- the company doing things deliberately designed to anger customers, vice provide to them services they can readily provide that the customers have been asking for.

    LIONED 33_XBLL 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBLL Offline
    LIONED 33_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #86

    @PriorFir4383355_XBL ding ding ding. Most people dont understand that literally most of us dont condone what he said. IF twitch wants to ban him fine. SDS had no reason to ban him. If a Best Buy wants to throw you out, thats fine, but say Xbox banned you for what you did in Best Buy from playing their machines....they can't lol. Again its an awful look, and ultimately he paid the price.

    PriorFir4383355_XBLP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • LHUBison58_XBLL Online
    LHUBison58_XBLL Online
    LHUBison58_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #87

    @ncsauce_MLBTS Was he in their place of business? Was he using their software to spread his misogynistic and degrading views? From the facts as I know them, he was not. He was on twitch. While I applauded the spirit of what SDS did, I do think the legality of the move is dubious.

    theBlindRhino_PSNT yankblan_PSNY 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • PriorFir4383355_XBLP Offline
    PriorFir4383355_XBLP Offline
    PriorFir4383355_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by PriorFir4383355_XBL
    #88

    @LIONED-33_XBL said in Players banned for cheating.:

    @PriorFir4383355_XBL ding ding ding. Most people dont understand that literally most of us dont condone what he said. IF twitch wants to ban him fine. SDS had no reason to ban him. If a Best Buy wants to throw you out, thats fine, but say Xbox banned you for what you did in Best Buy from playing their machines....they can't lol. Again its an awful look, and ultimately he paid the price.

    Perhaps initially, but SDS should be quite careful here. They may have crossed a legal line. SDS can bar people from say access to their own vault. But, in this case, SDS went beyond that and used their influence to take adverse action against someone for what is in effect writing a negative review of a company.

    There is a federal law, named the Consumer Review Fairness Act (CRFA). It serves to "protect people's ability to share their honest opinions about a business's products, services, or conduct, in any forum, including social media."

    The Federal Trade Commission administers the law and so this individual could report SDS to the FTC, or to a state Attorney General, and seek a suit against SDS for taking retaliatory actions to squelch his freedom of speech to question the actions that SDS took. The individual cannot sue in court for violations of the CRFA, but the FTC can bring such a suit via the US Department of Justice, or a state AG can seek an indictment and bring a case before a state court where this person resides.

    In my view, SDS crossed a legal Rubicon and made a huge mistake doing so. They could have barred this person from online play options for cheating, but they cannot extend those actions into seeking third party entities to take actions against such people, especially when the perceived offense is merely writing a negative review of a company.

    So far in this thread, there has not been any factual details provided to prove that this person cheated. And that's important. If SDS communicated to Twitch information that this person cheated, and he actually did not, then there is also a potential legal case for libel or slander depending on whether the accusations were made in writing or by word.

    This is why the right move for a company is to ignore people writing bad reviews about you. Attempting to silence such reviews carries grave legal risks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • theBlindRhino_PSNT Offline
    theBlindRhino_PSNT Offline
    theBlindRhino_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #89

    @LHUBison58_XBL said in Players banned for cheating.:

    @ncsauce_MLBTS Was he in their place of business? Was he using their software to spread his misogynistic and degrading views? From the facts as I know them, he was not. He was on twitch. While I applauded the spirit of what SDS did, I do think the legality of the move is dubious.

    I don’t know who you all are talking about but if someone is playing a game on twitch and spreading a message against SDS morals and twitch has no issues than SDS has every right to permanently ban the guy. He can still say dumb stuff on twitch but he’ll have to play another studios games.

    LHUBison58_XBLL 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • LHUBison58_XBLL Online
    LHUBison58_XBLL Online
    LHUBison58_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by LHUBison58_XBL
    #90

    @theBlindRhino_PSN That’s not legal. Unless they have some clause written in their TOS (which I am admitting to have not read), you can’t ban someone for their speech if they are not using your product to amplify their speech. Nike can’t ban someone from wearing their sneakers because they had them on when they assaulted someone. It doesn’t work that way. I agree with someone else above. SDS may have crossed the line on this one.

    And this guy was saying some very rude stuff about Ashley at SDS. I am appalled by what I have read about it. But as Voltaire said, I would be prepared to defend his right to say it. Not sure I’d die for it though. Lol

    theBlindRhino_PSNT 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • theBlindRhino_PSNT Offline
    theBlindRhino_PSNT Offline
    theBlindRhino_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by theBlindRhino_PSN
    #91

    @LHUBison58_XBL said in Players banned for cheating.:

    @theBlindRhino_PSN That’s not legal. Unless they have some clause written in their TOS (which I am admitting to have not read), you can’t ban someone for their speech if they are not using your product to amplify their speech. Nike can’t ban someone from wearing their sneakers because they had them on when they assaulted someone. It doesn’t work that way. I agree with someone else above. SDS may have crossed the line on this one.

    And this guy was saying some very rude stuff about Ashley at SDS. I am appalled by what I have read about it. But as Voltaire said, I would be prepared to defend his right to say it. Not sure I’d die for it though. Lol

    Are you a lawyer? They absolutely can ban the person. Free speech is freedom from prosecution. And in this scenario he streamer is using MLBTS as a lure to get viewers.

    LHUBison58_XBLL 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • LHUBison58_XBLL Online
    LHUBison58_XBLL Online
    LHUBison58_XBL
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #92

    @theBlindRhino_PSN You can be such a lovely fellow commentator. No, I’m not a lawyer. I have taught Con Law at a major university so I am well aware of the usage, interpretation and abuse of the first amendment. Not a lawyer mind you, but I’m not some schmuck either. This is dubious ground for SDS. That’s my stance on it, I don’t get on twitch and act like an a$$hat so I don’t need to worry about it.

    theBlindRhino_PSNT 1 Reply Last reply
    1

X Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitch Discord TikTok
Major League Baseball Players Association Major League Baseball Sony Interactive Entertainment PlayStation Studios San Diego Studio ESRB ESRB Certificate
Terms of Use Privacy Policy TheShow.com Community Code of Conduct MLB The Show Online Code of Conduct MLB The Show Games

Stubs is a registered trademark or trademark of Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

"PlayStation Family Mark", "PlayStation", "PS5 Logo", and "PS4 Logo" are registered trademarks or trademarks of Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.

Microsoft, the Xbox Sphere mark, Series X|S logo, and Xbox Series X|S are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.

Nintendo Switch is a trademark of Nintendo.

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com. The Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc., as applicable. Visit the official website of the Hall of Fame at BaseballHall.org

Officially Licensed Product of MLB Players, Inc. MLBPA trademarks, copyrighted works and other intellectual property rights are owned and/or held by MLBPA and may not be used without the written consent of MLBPA or MLB Players, Inc. Visit MLBPLAYERS.com, the Players Choice on the web.

© 2024 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.