• Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
Skins
  • Default (The Show 25)
  • No Skin
  • The Show 23
  • Dark
  • The Show 24
  • The Show 25
Collapse
THESHOW.COM
Game Game Support Support My Account My Account

Community Forum

50/50 Season

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Diamond Dynasty
26 Posts 11 Posters 3.1k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • GoozeFn_PSNG Offline
    GoozeFn_PSNG Offline
    GoozeFn_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #13

    @SaveFarris_PSN Well, the year after their chase 99, was one of his worst years, but you believe whatever you want to believe. I agree that he was probably a hall of famer without steroids, but I’m not going to pretend we know how long he was taking them. I especially don’t buy that he was a top 5 player all time without them.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SaveFarris_PSNS Offline
    SaveFarris_PSNS Offline
    SaveFarris_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Bond's career WAR from 86-98 was 99.9. That alone would have put him 27th on the all-time WAR list at the time (now 32nd) behind such people as Young, Collins, Alexander, Grove, and Spahn who, while all great in their own rights, owe their high WAR scores due to longevity.

    Labeling him as a Top 5 all-timer prior to 98 would certainly qualify as a Hot Take, but you could definitely make the case.

    GoozeFn_PSNG Teak2112_MLBTST 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • arvcpa_MLBTSA Offline
    arvcpa_MLBTSA Offline
    arvcpa_MLBTS
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #15

    @virusts_XBL said in 50/50 Season:

    Brady Anderson. Talk about a one hit wonder.

    Only need one card - 1996 Finest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • GoozeFn_PSNG Offline
    GoozeFn_PSNG Offline
    GoozeFn_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #16

    @SaveFarris_PSN I guess if you are quantifying careers solely based on WAR. That’s a pretty lazy way to judge who the greatest players of all time were IMO.

    SaveFarris_PSNS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSNX Offline
    X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSNX Offline
    X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    There's no way to judge whom would be the greatest player(s) of all time. Tou would have to take into effect era, would batters and pitchers be separate, would you include Negro League players, women who played during wars, etc.

    Some could argue that Ted Williams and his .404 avg, which no modern hitter has sniffed, would be the GOAT.

    Some could argue that Jackie Robinson is the GOAT; because he broke the Color Barrier.

    To many factors to take into consideration.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SaveFarris_PSNS Offline
    SaveFarris_PSNS Offline
    SaveFarris_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #18

    @GoozeFn_PSN said in 50/50 Season:

    I guess if you are quantifying careers solely based on WAR. That’s a pretty lazy way to judge who the greatest players of all time were IMO.

    If you've got a better quantitative way to measure players, I'm all ears. Until then, WAR is the best I've seen at comparing players across positions, eras, and parks.

    GoozeFn_PSNG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • GoozeFn_PSNG Offline
    GoozeFn_PSNG Offline
    GoozeFn_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #19

    @SaveFarris_PSN Well, there are a lot of reasons not to like WAR, but I’d love to hear how they are quantifying defensive WAR on players where there isn’t even video, like Babe Ruth. WAR is a deeply overrated statistic IMO. I could not care less about any argument that starts with WAR. I understand why people do it. It’s supposed to be a catch all on a players value, but if you dive into how it’s calculated, I’d bet most people will see how deeply flawed it is.

    theBlindRhino_PSNT 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • theBlindRhino_PSNT Offline
    theBlindRhino_PSNT Offline
    theBlindRhino_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #20

    @GoozeFn_PSN said in 50/50 Season:

    @SaveFarris_PSN Well, there are a lot of reasons not to like WAR, but I’d love to hear how they are quantifying defensive WAR on players where there isn’t even video, like Babe Ruth. WAR is a deeply overrated statistic IMO. I could not care less about any argument that starts with WAR. I understand why people do it. It’s supposed to be a catch all on a players value, but if you dive into how it’s calculated, I’d bet most people will see how deeply flawed it is.

    War. What is it good for?

    GoozeFn_PSNG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • GoozeFn_PSNG Offline
    GoozeFn_PSNG Offline
    GoozeFn_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #21

    @theBlindRhino_PSN Absolutely nothin

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Einarr44_PSNE Offline
    Einarr44_PSNE Offline
    Einarr44_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #22

    @X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSN
    So I wonder what the odds are on Ohtani actually getting to 60-60? Probably very long, but I think he has a puncher's chance.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Teak2112_MLBTST Offline
    Teak2112_MLBTST Offline
    Teak2112_MLBTS
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #23

    @SaveFarris_PSN said in 50/50 Season:

    Bond's career WAR from 86-98 was 99.9. That alone would have put him 27th on the all-time WAR list at the time (now 32nd) behind such people as Young, Collins, Alexander, Grove, and Spahn who, while all great in their own rights, owe their high WAR scores due to longevity.

    Labeling him as a Top 5 all-timer prior to 98 would certainly qualify as a Hot Take, but you could definitely make the case.

    Well he would have needed to have a decent end career, which again is far from certain.

    But his career through age 33 compares well with mays. mays was the better fielder (even if they had the same amount of gold gloves) but Bonds was probably the better hitter. 3 mvps in 4 years (with a second place finish the other year) speaks volumes about how good he was for the era. Even in that 1998 year bonds was still leading the league with 30 intentional walks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • dbub_PSND Offline
    dbub_PSND Offline
    dbub_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    Yeah Bonds was definitely a HOF before steroids, but not Top 5. Probably in the Top 10-20 range.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Easy_Duhz_It__PSNE Offline
    Easy_Duhz_It__PSNE Offline
    Easy_Duhz_It__PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #25

    @Teak2112_MLBTS said in 50/50 Season:

    It is widely accepted Bonds didnt start taking steroids until after the 1998 season

    Something being "widely accepted" doesnt make it fact. It was once "widely accepted" among kids that Santa Claus was real and now as adults, we know how that turned out.

    X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSNX 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSNX Offline
    X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSNX Offline
    X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #26

    @Easy_Duhz_It__PSN said in 50/50 Season:

    @Teak2112_MLBTS said in 50/50 Season:

    It is widely accepted Bonds didnt start taking steroids until after the 1998 season

    Something being "widely accepted" doesnt make it fact. It was once "widely accepted" among kids that Santa Claus was real and now as adults, we know how that turned out.

    Wait, Santa isn't real?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • A admin locked this topic on

X Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitch Discord TikTok
Major League Baseball Players Association Major League Baseball Sony Interactive Entertainment PlayStation Studios San Diego Studio ESRB ESRB Certificate
Terms of Use Privacy Policy TheShow.com Community Code of Conduct MLB The Show Online Code of Conduct MLB The Show Games

Stubs is a registered trademark or trademark of Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

"PlayStation Family Mark", "PlayStation", "PS5 Logo", and "PS4 Logo" are registered trademarks or trademarks of Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.

Microsoft, the Xbox Sphere mark, Series X|S logo, and Xbox Series X|S are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.

Nintendo Switch is a trademark of Nintendo.

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com. The Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc., as applicable. Visit the official website of the Hall of Fame at BaseballHall.org

Officially Licensed Product of MLB Players, Inc. MLBPA trademarks, copyrighted works and other intellectual property rights are owned and/or held by MLBPA and may not be used without the written consent of MLBPA or MLB Players, Inc. Visit MLBPLAYERS.com, the Players Choice on the web.

© 2024 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.