• Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
Skins
  • Default (The Show 25)
  • No Skin
  • The Show 23
  • Dark
  • The Show 24
  • The Show 25
Collapse
THESHOW.COM
Game Game Support Support My Account My Account

Community Forum

New Name for Face of the Franchise

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Diamond Dynasty
50 Posts 33 Posters 2.4k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #23

    @Maverick31762 said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    @SaveFarris said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    You heard them say why they picked who they picked, right?

    You weren't gonna get a FotF Trout, Freeman, or Yellich b/c they didn't want to just repeat diamonds. They wanted to spread the wealth.

    Ok sure...so it’s non-diamonds only..They still missed the mark on a number better choices

    LeMahieu, Machado, Thor, Suarez, Semien, Jensen, Story, etc

    Btw...how is Harper a diamond and Soto not.

    Lemahieu played for the yankees for 1 season and isn't a homegrown talent, I can see where you see Machado has the contract but Tatis is still the face of the padres, Thor makes sense, can't disagree with that one. Votto literally is the face of the Reds and has been for 15 years. Suarez has has one good season. Olson has been in Oakland his entire career and has been a consistently good player, semien has had 2 good seasons, Jansen is a relief pitcher, IMO that can't be anywhere associated with a face of the franchise unless you are Mariano Rivera, Story is a diamond, thus why he is not.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DanH35_PSND Offline
    DanH35_PSND Offline
    DanH35_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #24

    @janoosh said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    I mean, the Reds?

    Cardinals as well. Yadi is no doubt the face of the franchise.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • partyboy099_PSNP Offline
    partyboy099_PSNP Offline
    partyboy099_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Josh Bell for the Pirates... would probably be a legitimate “face.”

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Saint_Jerm30_PSNS Offline
    Saint_Jerm30_PSNS Offline
    Saint_Jerm30_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Peralta works for the Dbacks. But some teams they kinda had to be creative and do different players. Trout is obviously the face of the franchise for the Angels. But did anyone who’s played for awhile really expect a free Trout card? Probably not.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Namtrah22_PSNN Offline
    Namtrah22_PSNN Offline
    Namtrah22_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    We’re really grasping at anything and everything to get a little upset about on here now huh? The FOTF are fine. A lot of them are representing the players that have the longest tenure on their given team or it’s because the actual FOTF is already Diamond.

    Thor is the only one that I would agree with you, he would have been a way better choice for the Mets.

    That Lorenzo Cain card is Booty cheeks too. Should have been Ryan Braun or Keston Hiura. It’s possible they are going to release some these down the road in the team affinity’s as different card types like flashback hardware, breakout, all-star, rookie. We will just have to wait and see.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • clinty85_PSNC Offline
    clinty85_PSNC Offline
    clinty85_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    Every FOF card is correct except the cubs. You should be originally signed or drafted by that team and Rizzo was not so I don’t see how he is but that’s why machado can’t be the padres FOF

    Namtrah22_PSNN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Namtrah22_PSNN Offline
    Namtrah22_PSNN Offline
    Namtrah22_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #29

    @clinty85 said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    Every FOF card is correct except the cubs. You should be originally signed or drafted by that team and Rizzo was not so I don’t see how he is but that’s why machado can’t be the padres FOF

    Schwarber would have been cool

    clinty85_PSNC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Maverick31762M Offline
    Maverick31762M Offline
    Maverick31762
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    Cubs shulodve been Bryant.

    partyboy099_PSNP 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • clinty85_PSNC Offline
    clinty85_PSNC Offline
    clinty85_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #31

    @Namtrah22 said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    @clinty85 said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    Every FOF card is correct except the cubs. You should be originally signed or drafted by that team and Rizzo was not so I don’t see how he is but that’s why machado can’t be the padres FOF

    Schwarber would have been cool

    Yes exactly that’s what a FOF card is all about that would of been real sweet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    FranklinSabers16
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    We get the more known and better ones later, that’s why not all the parts of the team affinity are unlocked yet

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • greenbuk75_PSNG Offline
    greenbuk75_PSNG Offline
    greenbuk75_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #33

    @Maverick31762 said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    Instead of Face of the Franchise. It should be called better card for the best player on a horrible team (Boyd, Mancini, Merrifeild), Prospect that hasn't entirely lived up to full potential (Guerrero, Tatis) or Slightly improved version of the third or fourth best guy on the team.

    Seriously, is there a single FOTF card that represents that actual face of the franchise. Maybe WhiteSox is the legit FOTF.

    Merrifield is actually a good player tho...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • greenbuk75_PSNG Offline
    greenbuk75_PSNG Offline
    greenbuk75_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #34

    @Jholla31 said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    Yeah, I was pretty upset not to get a 93-95 Freddie Freeman instead of an 89 Ozzie Albies. Albies is the third best player on the Braves, at best. He's "a" face of the franchise, but not "THE" face of the franchise. I agree that it is a little misleading.

    Also, I realize that Acuna will probably be Atlanta's FOTF in another year or two, but Freddie has been the guy since Chipper retired.

    You realize this is just tier one of these fotf and those guys are prob in the higher ones

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • greenbuk75_PSNG Offline
    greenbuk75_PSNG Offline
    greenbuk75_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #35

    @Maverick31762 said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    @SaveFarris said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    You heard them say why they picked who they picked, right?

    You weren't gonna get a FotF Trout, Freeman, or Yellich b/c they didn't want to just repeat diamonds. They wanted to spread the wealth.

    Ok sure...so it’s non-diamonds only..They still missed the mark on a number better choices

    LeMahieu, Machado, Thor, Suarez, Semien, Jensen, Story, etc

    Btw...how is Harper a diamond and Soto not.

    They haven't missed [censored] lmao this is tier one, there's higher end ones coming every season of the year

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • partyboy099_PSNP Offline
    partyboy099_PSNP Offline
    partyboy099_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #36

    @Maverick31762 said in New Name for Face of the Franchise:

    Cubs shulodve been Bryant.

    Problem with Bryant is there’s a legitimate shot that he won’t be on the north side in a few months (if they even play this year) and SDS probably wanted to avoid having a FOTF card that represents a team he doesn’t even play for anymore.

    Maverick31762M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    allmustfall16
    wrote on last edited by
    #37

    All I know is I have a harder time pitching to FOTF Juan Soto than I do 99 Mantle.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • ThaSultanOfSwagT Offline
    ThaSultanOfSwagT Offline
    ThaSultanOfSwag
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Cant have 90+ rated Face of the franchise cards in a program that takes 3-4 hours to get one. There would be zero value for Live Series Diamonds and ruin the market.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Kevink_16_PSNK Offline
    Kevink_16_PSNK Offline
    Kevink_16_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    Cough cough* Rizzo

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • smalltownkid1990S Offline
    smalltownkid1990S Offline
    smalltownkid1990
    wrote on last edited by
    #40

    It more about finding guys they can realistically give low diamond cards to launch the game. If it was truly Face of the Franchise everybody would have a free Trout right now.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NOTandris_PSNN Offline
    NOTandris_PSNN Offline
    NOTandris_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    They said it themselves that these cards are not exactly the face of the franchise but a key piece of the team currently. What do you expect to get a Trout, Arenado or DeGrom when those guys already have a good diamond card? Let the guys who have crappy cards every year get something usable. I’m sure the upcoming cards will be better.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dbrown0399_PSND Offline
    Dbrown0399_PSND Offline
    Dbrown0399_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #42

    I call them Affinty (full name in here). i noticed these guys are the FOTF if they weren’t a LS diamond . cause imo the actual FOTF are already diamonds. only expectation is the posey who has his 99 diamond card.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

X Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitch Discord TikTok
Major League Baseball Players Association Major League Baseball Sony Interactive Entertainment PlayStation Studios San Diego Studio ESRB ESRB Certificate
Terms of Use Privacy Policy TheShow.com Community Code of Conduct MLB The Show Online Code of Conduct MLB The Show Games

Stubs is a registered trademark or trademark of Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

"PlayStation Family Mark", "PlayStation", "PS5 Logo", and "PS4 Logo" are registered trademarks or trademarks of Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.

Microsoft, the Xbox Sphere mark, Series X|S logo, and Xbox Series X|S are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.

Nintendo Switch is a trademark of Nintendo.

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com. The Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc., as applicable. Visit the official website of the Hall of Fame at BaseballHall.org

Officially Licensed Product of MLB Players, Inc. MLBPA trademarks, copyrighted works and other intellectual property rights are owned and/or held by MLBPA and may not be used without the written consent of MLBPA or MLB Players, Inc. Visit MLBPLAYERS.com, the Players Choice on the web.

© 2024 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.