BS Double Standard for Collections
-
Just curious if anyone else has noticed the BS double standard from SDS regarding player collections. When players go on the IL they are usually put in the free agents pool. However both Acuna and Tatis have been on the IL for large periods of time this year and never went to the Free Agent pool. Tatis is still on the IL! They have obviously done this so that people can't complete collections as easily. Just curious if anyone else has picked up on this blatant double standard?
-
I've noticed and I really don't care tbh, yeah it sucks, but I get why they do it. Would it make you happy if they just expanded it so you needed more and more players? Keep Glasnow on the Rays and now you need 41? I would guess probably not, and that's the only way I see they'd stop the double standard.
-
Because the Braves and Padres have players on the 40 man roster that haven’t made their MLB debuts. Once they do, they’d get moved to the FA pool.
-
SDS never moves diamond IL players to the Free Agent list. They haven't moved Sale there from Boston, and I don't believe they ever have. The only time they would ever move a diamond to free agents is when said diamond is suspended by the league.
-
They shouldn't move high diamonds to free agent pool. Doing so would make it too easy for late comers to complete collections.
-
@theblindrhino said in BS Double Standard for Collections:
They shouldn't move high diamonds to free agent pool. Doing so would make it too easy for late comers to complete collections.
It would be too easy for anyone to complete it if they were smart enough. The only one of 100k+ live series cards that doesn't have an extensive injury history is Ramirez
-
A admin locked this topic on
