You [censored] cry babies
-
POV: you can’t get the CPU to take out a starter based on performance and needed the game to do it for you
-
@charterbus_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
POV: you can’t get the CPU to take out a starter based on performance and needed the game to do it for you
Yes one can get the SP removed by performance! Score 4 runs in the first inning (in Conquest, 5 runs for 9-inning vs CPU game) and he's gone!
-
Not to sound negative; but while I appreciate this fix, I'm waiting to see what it 'breaks'.
For example, no more decreased stamina in RS?
-
Lol imagine complaining about conquest.
-
@dap1234567890 said in You [censored] cry babies:
I didn't even notice the whistling until someone said something in this forum!
Every time my wife whistles for the dog, I instinctively click the d-pad to make sure I have a reliever warmed up in the bullpen.
-
@ericulous1_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
Maybe they won't over- correct
Hahahahahaha....sorry, needed a laugh, but at least in Conquest, I much prefer facing the starter until I knock him out rather than having to face guys like Darren O'Day.
SDS WOULD NEVER!!!
-
@dap1234567890 said in You [censored] cry babies:
@charterbus_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
POV: you can’t get the CPU to take out a starter based on performance and needed the game to do it for you
Yes one can get the SP removed by performance! Score 4 runs in the first inning (in Conquest, 5 runs for 9-inning vs CPU game) and he's gone!
I don’t think you understood his post...
-
We don't even know if it changes their logic though...
-
Starter stamina was fine and shouldn't be touched. Relievers needed a bit more but not much maybe an extra 5 pitches. It's the BR crowd that has the complaint. They don't want to start having to draft starting pitchers.
-
@go4stros25_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
Starter stamina was fine and shouldn't be touched. Relievers needed a bit more but not much maybe an extra 5 pitches. It's the BR crowd that has the complaint. They don't want to start having to draft starting pitchers.
Starter stamina was not fine and it needed to be fixed for 3 inning modes. Drafting a great starter in BR before was pointless. Why waste a good pick on a starter who will be gassed after 10 pitches when you can't use him for another 4 games? You could get a reliever down to 0 stamina, and he'll be good to go after one game of rest. With a system that broken, can you really blame people for going all in on the bullpen?
If the stamina is actually fixed, then I won't mind using some of the starters in the rotation. I picked Alex Wood and Bob Feller in my last draft, and they were actually able to go 2 innings. Imagine that.
-
@foofencer_nsw said in You [censored] cry babies:
@go4stros25_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
Starter stamina was fine and shouldn't be touched. Relievers needed a bit more but not much maybe an extra 5 pitches. It's the BR crowd that has the complaint. They don't want to start having to draft starting pitchers.
Starter stamina was not fine and it needed to be fixed for 3 inning modes. Drafting a great starter in BR before was pointless. Why waste a good pick on a starter who will be gassed after 10 pitches when you can't use him for another 4 games? You could get a reliever down to 0 stamina, and he'll be good to go after one game of rest. With a system that broken, can you really blame people for going all in on the bullpen?
If the stamina is actually fixed, then I won't mind using some of the starters in the rotation. I picked Alex Wood and Bob Feller in my last draft, and they were actually able to go 2 innings. Imagine that.
Totally agree. It massively changed my BR strategy. I was drafting for bullpen depth at the expense of everything else (even hitting).
Offline grinders whining about facing the best CPU pitchers all the time?
JUST PLAY ON ROOKIE!!
-
I think they should target somewhere between this year and the years prior.
-
@jkooch66_xbl said in You [censored] cry babies:
I'm pretty furious they are changing stamina for 3 inning modes. I play 99% offline and this made things so much better against the CPU in conquest and mini seasons with them going deep into pens. And for online players it affects both sides equally so who cares? Now mini seasons is gonna be 3 innings of 99 randy Johnson every other game.
This post + your title = x
You do the math.
-
@dbub_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
@foofencer_nsw said in You [censored] cry babies:
@go4stros25_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
Starter stamina was fine and shouldn't be touched. Relievers needed a bit more but not much maybe an extra 5 pitches. It's the BR crowd that has the complaint. They don't want to start having to draft starting pitchers.
Starter stamina was not fine and it needed to be fixed for 3 inning modes. Drafting a great starter in BR before was pointless. Why waste a good pick on a starter who will be gassed after 10 pitches when you can't use him for another 4 games? You could get a reliever down to 0 stamina, and he'll be good to go after one game of rest. With a system that broken, can you really blame people for going all in on the bullpen?
If the stamina is actually fixed, then I won't mind using some of the starters in the rotation. I picked Alex Wood and Bob Feller in my last draft, and they were actually able to go 2 innings. Imagine that.
Totally agree. It massively changed my BR strategy. I was drafting for bullpen depth at the expense of everything else (even hitting).
Offline grinders whining about facing the best CPU pitchers all the time?
JUST PLAY ON ROOKIE!!
Oh yeah because it's the offline folks who are the whiners lol
Whaaa contact hitting
Whaaa pci feedback
Whaaa stamina
Whaaa everyone gets rewards
Whaaa high sinkers
Whaaa bunt cheese
Whaaa pause time
Whaaa R2
Whaaa outlier
Whaaa pinpointWe just play the game.
-
@go4stros25_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
@dbub_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
@foofencer_nsw said in You [censored] cry babies:
@go4stros25_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
Starter stamina was fine and shouldn't be touched. Relievers needed a bit more but not much maybe an extra 5 pitches. It's the BR crowd that has the complaint. They don't want to start having to draft starting pitchers.
Starter stamina was not fine and it needed to be fixed for 3 inning modes. Drafting a great starter in BR before was pointless. Why waste a good pick on a starter who will be gassed after 10 pitches when you can't use him for another 4 games? You could get a reliever down to 0 stamina, and he'll be good to go after one game of rest. With a system that broken, can you really blame people for going all in on the bullpen?
If the stamina is actually fixed, then I won't mind using some of the starters in the rotation. I picked Alex Wood and Bob Feller in my last draft, and they were actually able to go 2 innings. Imagine that.
Totally agree. It massively changed my BR strategy. I was drafting for bullpen depth at the expense of everything else (even hitting).
Offline grinders whining about facing the best CPU pitchers all the time?
JUST PLAY ON ROOKIE!!
Oh yeah because it's the offline folks who are the whiners lol
Whaaa contact hitting
Whaaa pci feedback
Whaaa stamina
Whaaa everyone gets rewards
Whaaa high sinkers
Whaaa bunt cheese
Whaaa pause time
Whaaa R2
Whaaa outlier
Whaaa pinpointWe just play the game.
Haha fair points. Touche.
-
The best way to do it would be leave the SP like they are now and increase BP stamina. For the starters the 1st inning is equivalent to the 7th inn. So they should be getting tired.
-
the needed to fix stamina....on a side note, I keep playing cry babies that message me and say
"harassing" things to me, I don't care but I respond and they report you for "vulgar" language if you say [censored] or cheeks or anything of the sort. Even if it is not directed at them.....what has come of this world that someone is butthurt about being called cheeks, and worse than that...why does Sony have such a strict policy on language -
@crimson_monk_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
the needed to fix stamina....on a side note, I keep playing cry babies that message me and say
"harassing" things to me, I don't care but I respond and they report you for "vulgar" language if you say [censored] or cheeks or anything of the sort. Even if it is not directed at them.....what has come of this world that someone is butthurt about being called cheeks, and worse than that...why does Sony have such a strict policy on languageWhy are you responding to them at all? Do you expect to have a rational conversation with someone saying "harassing" things to you? Either turn off messages completely, or accept the fact that you will get some of those every once in a while and ignore them.
-
@foofencer_nsw said in You [censored] cry babies:
@crimson_monk_psn said in You [censored] cry babies:
the needed to fix stamina....on a side note, I keep playing cry babies that message me and say
"harassing" things to me, I don't care but I respond and they report you for "vulgar" language if you say [censored] or cheeks or anything of the sort. Even if it is not directed at them.....what has come of this world that someone is butthurt about being called cheeks, and worse than that...why does Sony have such a strict policy on languageWhy are you responding to them at all? Do you expect to have a rational conversation with someone saying "harassing" things to you? Either turn off messages completely, or accept the fact that you will get some of those every once in a while and ignore them.
its a pride thing ......but the point is why are people so weak that they can't handle a mildly vulgar word.....and why does PSN have such strict rules....im pretty sure everyone would have been banned back in the MW2 days lol
-
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in You [censored] cry babies:
Lol imagine complaining about conquest.
Ok, that's pretty funny. Kind of mean, but funny.
