• Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
Skins
  • Default (The Show 25)
  • No Skin
  • The Show 23
  • Dark
  • The Show 24
  • The Show 25
Collapse
THESHOW.COM
Game Game Support Support My Account My Account

Community Forum

Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Diamond Dynasty
21 Posts 12 Posters 985 Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • eatyum_PSNE Offline
    eatyum_PSNE Offline
    eatyum_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #5

    @jogger171717_psn said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    @savefarris_psn said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    In a way, makes all the sense in the world. Griff Sr was a good-not-great player for a long time so the card that stretches over his whole career should be better than one that focuses on his peak, because his peak wasn't that high.

    A perfect example of the opposite would be Luis Gonzalez who had a tremendous peak but the rest of his career was average to middling.

    I would disagree (only about Griffey, not Gonzalez). A players prime is the absolute best that player can be, so it would only make sense for a prime card to be the highest version a player can get. Adding in stats from the rest of his career should only bring the rating down, since those numbers are guaranteed to be worse overall. I could maybe see if someone like Griffey Sr.’s prime and signature cards were the same overall, but saying his career as a whole is 4 overalls better than his actual best years just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

    But a signature is mixing and matching stuff, so his power from after his prime combined with his higher average and speed from his prime would make it higher then just his prime which would have less power on the card

    jogger171717_PSNJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Ericulous1_PSNE Offline
    Ericulous1_PSNE Offline
    Ericulous1_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    I totally get your argument in theory. But the real answer is: it's late in the game and all releases will be 96 or higher. Maybe they are taking his offspring into account and giving him credit for that hahaha.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • crashbowman447_PSNC Offline
    crashbowman447_PSNC Offline
    crashbowman447_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    To me this is more of a simple one...was Griffey Sr. really a 97 Signature?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jogger171717_PSNJ Offline
    jogger171717_PSNJ Offline
    jogger171717_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #8

    @eatyum_psn said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    @jogger171717_psn said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    @savefarris_psn said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    In a way, makes all the sense in the world. Griff Sr was a good-not-great player for a long time so the card that stretches over his whole career should be better than one that focuses on his peak, because his peak wasn't that high.

    A perfect example of the opposite would be Luis Gonzalez who had a tremendous peak but the rest of his career was average to middling.

    I would disagree (only about Griffey, not Gonzalez). A players prime is the absolute best that player can be, so it would only make sense for a prime card to be the highest version a player can get. Adding in stats from the rest of his career should only bring the rating down, since those numbers are guaranteed to be worse overall. I could maybe see if someone like Griffey Sr.’s prime and signature cards were the same overall, but saying his career as a whole is 4 overalls better than his actual best years just doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

    But a signature is mixing and matching stuff, so his power from after his prime combined with his higher average and speed from his prime would make it higher then just his prime which would have less power on the card

    His career ISO is lower than the average ISO of his prime years though. Adding numbers from his worse years should only make the rating go down, not up 4 overalls.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • jcassaro44_PSNJ Offline
    jcassaro44_PSNJ Offline
    jcassaro44_PSN
    wrote on last edited by jcassaro44_PSN
    #9

    This is a rare time when late in the year we have a better SR than JR card.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • crashbowman447_PSNC Offline
    crashbowman447_PSNC Offline
    crashbowman447_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Johnny Damon Career WAR 56.3
    Griffey Sr. Career WAR 34.5

    Best 3 year span for Damon 14 WAR
    Best 3 year span for Griffey 11.4 WAR

    Damon has a 96 Sig and Griffey a 97...not saying Damon should have a 96, but I think it is much more justified than Griffey having a 97.

    eatyum_PSNE 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • DaKid24167_XBLD Offline
    DaKid24167_XBLD Offline
    DaKid24167_XBL
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    what do the stats look like

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    You still haven't noticed that Prime cards are the worst of the main 4? They are reserved for relievers and dudes like Ellsbury and Matt Harvey who only had 2 good years. Honus and Cobb last year were the exceptions.

    TEXAS10PT_PSNT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • eatyum_PSNE Offline
    eatyum_PSNE Offline
    eatyum_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #13

    @crashbowman447_psn said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    Johnny Damon Career WAR 56.3
    Griffey Sr. Career WAR 34.5

    Best 3 year span for Damon 14 WAR
    Best 3 year span for Griffey 11.4 WAR

    Damon has a 96 Sig and Griffey a 97...not saying Damon should have a 96, but I think it is much more justified than Griffey having a 97.

    Which is really weird when you think about it, considering Griffey Sr had an above average wRC+ in almost every year and Damon, while above average for his career, was less so in that department.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Schwizzle_Nizzle_PSNS Offline
    Schwizzle_Nizzle_PSNS Offline
    Schwizzle_Nizzle_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooring

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Schwizzle_Nizzle_PSNS Offline
    Schwizzle_Nizzle_PSNS Offline
    Schwizzle_Nizzle_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooring

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • SaveFarris_PSNS Offline
    SaveFarris_PSNS Offline
    SaveFarris_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooourns

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • TEXAS10PT_PSNT Offline
    TEXAS10PT_PSNT Offline
    TEXAS10PT_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #17

    @the_dragon1912 said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    You still haven't noticed that Prime cards are the worst of the main 4? They are reserved for relievers and dudes like Ellsbury and Matt Harvey who only had 2 good years. Honus and Cobb last year were the exceptions.

    Joe Morgan's card this year is a Prime and for me he is crazy good.

    the_dragon1912_PSNT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #18

    @texas10pt_psn said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    @the_dragon1912 said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    You still haven't noticed that Prime cards are the worst of the main 4? They are reserved for relievers and dudes like Ellsbury and Matt Harvey who only had 2 good years. Honus and Cobb last year were the exceptions.

    Joe Morgan's card this year is a Prime and for me he is crazy good.

    I'm not saying prime cards can't be good, but Morgan's signature card in 19 was better attributes wise no?

    jogger171717_PSNJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Knoxwurst31_PSNK Offline
    Knoxwurst31_PSNK Offline
    Knoxwurst31_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooring

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jogger171717_PSNJ Offline
    jogger171717_PSNJ Offline
    jogger171717_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #20

    @the_dragon1912 said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    @texas10pt_psn said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    @the_dragon1912 said in Ken Griffey Sr. Prime vs Signature:

    You still haven't noticed that Prime cards are the worst of the main 4? They are reserved for relievers and dudes like Ellsbury and Matt Harvey who only had 2 good years. Honus and Cobb last year were the exceptions.

    Joe Morgan's card this year is a Prime and for me he is crazy good.

    I'm not saying prime cards can't be good, but Morgan's signature card in 19 was better attributes wise no?

    Prime Morgan has overall better attributes.

    2019 SS Joe Morgan:
    101 CON R
    98 CON L
    85 PWR R
    72 PWR L
    124 Vision
    125 DISC
    95 Clutch
    92 fielding
    74 Arm
    86 Reaction
    94 speed
    99 steal

    2021 Prime Morgan:
    118 CON R
    102 CON L
    102 PWR R
    74 PWR L
    111 Vision
    125 DISC
    110 Clutch
    92 fielding
    73 Arm
    86 Reaction
    93 speed
    99 steal

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BobbyRomano24B Offline
    BobbyRomano24B Offline
    BobbyRomano24
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Not a new card. Same as the 2019 SS. I’m fine with it. Fits on my Mariners theme team, still waiting for Jr. Also, they mention “Signature season” for these programs/moments. So it’s not really based off a whole career but sometimes only one season. But also it uses the best power and best speed and best fielding from any point in their career.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A admin locked this topic on

X Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitch Discord TikTok
Major League Baseball Players Association Major League Baseball Sony Interactive Entertainment PlayStation Studios San Diego Studio ESRB ESRB Certificate
Terms of Use Privacy Policy TheShow.com Community Code of Conduct MLB The Show Online Code of Conduct MLB The Show Games

Stubs is a registered trademark or trademark of Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

"PlayStation Family Mark", "PlayStation", "PS5 Logo", and "PS4 Logo" are registered trademarks or trademarks of Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.

Microsoft, the Xbox Sphere mark, Series X|S logo, and Xbox Series X|S are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.

Nintendo Switch is a trademark of Nintendo.

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com. The Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc., as applicable. Visit the official website of the Hall of Fame at BaseballHall.org

Officially Licensed Product of MLB Players, Inc. MLBPA trademarks, copyrighted works and other intellectual property rights are owned and/or held by MLBPA and may not be used without the written consent of MLBPA or MLB Players, Inc. Visit MLBPLAYERS.com, the Players Choice on the web.

© 2024 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.