• Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
Skins
  • Default (The Show 25)
  • No Skin
  • The Show 23
  • Dark
  • The Show 24
  • The Show 25
Collapse
THESHOW.COM
Game Game Support Support My Account My Account

Community Forum

Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Diamond Dynasty
34 Posts 19 Posters 1.6k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MACKTASTIC BRAD_XBLM Offline
    MACKTASTIC BRAD_XBLM Offline
    MACKTASTIC BRAD_XBL
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #12

    @the_dragon1912 said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    There are a whopping 3 Future stars cards that are used in ranked. 1 is winning the rookie of the year award, 1 is the number 1 prospect, and 1 legitimately has a glitched release. As much as people complained about topps now cards when Wendle and Grandal came out I've still seen more of George Brett. Lets not act like every lineup is full of them

    At least Topps now is based off of an actual performance these guys get cards for being hyped

    the_dragon1912_PSNT BodamEscapePlan_PSNB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #13

    @macktastic-brad_xbl said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @the_dragon1912 said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    There are a whopping 3 Future stars cards that are used in ranked. 1 is winning the rookie of the year award, 1 is the number 1 prospect, and 1 legitimately has a glitched release. As much as people complained about topps now cards when Wendle and Grandal came out I've still seen more of George Brett. Lets not act like every lineup is full of them

    At least Topps now is based off of an actual performance these guys get cards for being hyped

    Would you rather wait until Tork wins rookie of the year next year? Imo its not much different releasing him now

    jogger171717_PSNJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • jogger171717_PSNJ Offline
    jogger171717_PSNJ Offline
    jogger171717_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #14

    @the_dragon1912 said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @macktastic-brad_xbl said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @the_dragon1912 said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    There are a whopping 3 Future stars cards that are used in ranked. 1 is winning the rookie of the year award, 1 is the number 1 prospect, and 1 legitimately has a glitched release. As much as people complained about topps now cards when Wendle and Grandal came out I've still seen more of George Brett. Lets not act like every lineup is full of them

    At least Topps now is based off of an actual performance these guys get cards for being hyped

    Would you rather wait until Tork wins rookie of the year next year? Imo its not much different releasing him now

    That would mean he actually accomplished something at the major league level first, so yeah waiting would be preferable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • cdnmoneymaker93_MLBTSC Offline
    cdnmoneymaker93_MLBTSC Offline
    cdnmoneymaker93_MLBTS
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #15

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    I mean this is all fantasy

    Lets not pretend that Babe Ruth would be able to hit Jacob Degrome or Verlander.

    There is this idea that a legend of the past can hang with today's stars it's not happening so FS just adds in to what is just on big What If mode

    ChuckCLC_PSNC BloopNaBlast_34_PSNB 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • ChuckCLC_PSNC Offline
    ChuckCLC_PSNC Offline
    ChuckCLC_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #16

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    I mean this is all fantasy

    Lets not pretend that Babe Ruth would be able to hit Jacob Degrome or Verlander.

    There is this idea that a legend of the past can hang with today's stars it's not happening so FS just adds in to what is just on big What If mode

    I disagree. If Babe Ruth was alive today and played baseball he would crush. He wouldnt be able, nor would want to have the lifestyle he had 100 years ago. things are different now. His nutrition and exercise would be totally different and his knowledge and the people with knowledge around him would be totally different.

    poksey_MLBTSP 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • poksey_MLBTSP Offline
    poksey_MLBTSP Offline
    poksey_MLBTS
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #17

    @chuckclc_psn said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    I mean this is all fantasy

    Lets not pretend that Babe Ruth would be able to hit Jacob Degrome or Verlander.

    There is this idea that a legend of the past can hang with today's stars it's not happening so FS just adds in to what is just on big What If mode

    I disagree. If Babe Ruth was alive today and played baseball he would crush. He wouldnt be able, nor would want to have the lifestyle he had 100 years ago. things are different now. His nutrition and exercise would be totally different and his knowledge and the people with knowledge around him would be totally different.

    Yeah. I dont understand how some people believe it would be impossible for older players to compete today. I suppose if you are talking about dropping them in for an at bat, they would struggle, but given any amount of time to adjust, they would still be elite players. Same as the pitchers from today. They wouldnt last back then, having to throw complete games every 4 days. I'm sure they would have to adjust to perform and stay healthy.

    ChuckCLC_PSNC abbyspapa_PSNA 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • ChuckCLC_PSNC Offline
    ChuckCLC_PSNC Offline
    ChuckCLC_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by ChuckCLC_PSN
    #18

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @chuckclc_psn said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    I mean this is all fantasy

    Lets not pretend that Babe Ruth would be able to hit Jacob Degrome or Verlander.

    There is this idea that a legend of the past can hang with today's stars it's not happening so FS just adds in to what is just on big What If mode

    I disagree. If Babe Ruth was alive today and played baseball he would crush. He wouldnt be able, nor would want to have the lifestyle he had 100 years ago. things are different now. His nutrition and exercise would be totally different and his knowledge and the people with knowledge around him would be totally different.

    Yeah. I dont understand how some people believe it would be impossible for older players to compete today. I suppose if you are talking about dropping them in for an at bat, they would struggle, but given any amount of time to adjust, they would still be elite players. Same as the pitchers from today. They wouldnt last back then, having to throw complete games every 4 days. I'm sure they would have to adjust to perform and stay healthy.

    Well said. Would definitely be different if someone was just dropped in for a short period of time. But if you grew up in that time, now or then, you would be fine.

    Hell most players today if dropped in back then would be dead in a week, just from their ideals and beliefs, and their bodies never found because of the poor forensics, .

    "Hey were is ole Mike Trout, we sent him back to 1920 in the time machine for a week but he never showed up to get transported back?" "Yeah he went 5-5 with 5 Homers in that first game but never showed up to the park day 2." "Heard he was shooting his mouth off about the way guys were treating people and disagreeing with some of the stuff going on back then." Think they might have caught up to him and (took care of him)."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MikeRFOFC_PSNM Offline
    MikeRFOFC_PSNM Offline
    MikeRFOFC_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    Future Stars cards have been around in real packs since 1980. It’s just hedging a bet, like draft pick cards or Rated Rookie cards or Diamond Kings.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Riican_2_PSNR Offline
    Riican_2_PSNR Offline
    Riican_2_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Also no one is touching in the point of how it helps grow the game as well. Besides the obvious top prospects guys a lot of these guys are players that most people wouldn’t know who they are before they get to the league. I think it’s kind of cool that I was excited for future star Tyler O’Neil a couple of years ago and now it’s even cooler to see him doing what he’s doing lately

    the_dragon1912_PSNT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSNT Offline
    the_dragon1912_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #21

    @riican_2_psn said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    Also no one is touching in the point of how it helps grow the game as well. Besides the obvious top prospects guys a lot of these guys are players that most people wouldn’t know who they are before they get to the league. I think it’s kind of cool that I was excited for future star Tyler O’Neil a couple of years ago and now it’s even cooler to see him doing what he’s doing lately

    Bingo. After Julio Urias got his future star card I thought he was a bust for a long time. He's going to finish top 5 in the NL Cy young this year. You are going to have some busts from these future stars cards for sure, but a lot more of these younger guys that are being very productive in the league got future stars cards in the show than people think

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • BodamEscapePlan_PSNB Offline
    BodamEscapePlan_PSNB Offline
    BodamEscapePlan_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    Tomas Nido wasn't a complete miss, or really all that disappointing. I've seen a lot of Mets fans talk him up.

    Other than that, good job on this.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BodamEscapePlan_PSNB Offline
    BodamEscapePlan_PSNB Offline
    BodamEscapePlan_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #23

    @macktastic-brad_xbl said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @the_dragon1912 said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    There are a whopping 3 Future stars cards that are used in ranked. 1 is winning the rookie of the year award, 1 is the number 1 prospect, and 1 legitimately has a glitched release. As much as people complained about topps now cards when Wendle and Grandal came out I've still seen more of George Brett. Lets not act like every lineup is full of them

    At least Topps now is based off of an actual performance these guys get cards for being hyped

    I don't know... I take more qualm with some of the more outrageous Topps Now cards more than I do for the Future Stars/Prospect cards -- well, except the ones that were and always will be a huge stretch like The Show 20's Team Affinity 2 Future Stars drop. I think they corrected that this year by not going too overboard on mid-range prospects.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • abbyspapa_PSNA Offline
    abbyspapa_PSNA Offline
    abbyspapa_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #24

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @chuckclc_psn said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    I mean this is all fantasy

    Lets not pretend that Babe Ruth would be able to hit Jacob Degrome or Verlander.

    There is this idea that a legend of the past can hang with today's stars it's not happening so FS just adds in to what is just on big What If mode

    I disagree. If Babe Ruth was alive today and played baseball he would crush. He wouldnt be able, nor would want to have the lifestyle he had 100 years ago. things are different now. His nutrition and exercise would be totally different and his knowledge and the people with knowledge around him would be totally different.

    Yeah. I dont understand how some people believe it would be impossible for older players to compete today. I suppose if you are talking about dropping them in for an at bat, they would struggle, but given any amount of time to adjust, they would still be elite players. Same as the pitchers from today. They wouldnt last back then, having to throw complete games every 4 days. I'm sure they would have to adjust to perform and stay healthy.

    Every 4 days? How about 2 complete games on the same day like Cy Young (and others) did? I'd be interested to see DeGrom throw 18 innings in one day.

    poksey_MLBTSP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • poksey_MLBTSP Offline
    poksey_MLBTSP Offline
    poksey_MLBTS
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #25

    @abbyspapa_psn said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @chuckclc_psn said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    I mean this is all fantasy

    Lets not pretend that Babe Ruth would be able to hit Jacob Degrome or Verlander.

    There is this idea that a legend of the past can hang with today's stars it's not happening so FS just adds in to what is just on big What If mode

    I disagree. If Babe Ruth was alive today and played baseball he would crush. He wouldnt be able, nor would want to have the lifestyle he had 100 years ago. things are different now. His nutrition and exercise would be totally different and his knowledge and the people with knowledge around him would be totally different.

    Yeah. I dont understand how some people believe it would be impossible for older players to compete today. I suppose if you are talking about dropping them in for an at bat, they would struggle, but given any amount of time to adjust, they would still be elite players. Same as the pitchers from today. They wouldnt last back then, having to throw complete games every 4 days. I'm sure they would have to adjust to perform and stay healthy.

    Every 4 days? How about 2 complete games on the same day like Cy Young (and others) did? I'd be interested to see DeGrom throw 18 innings in one day.

    Well, we were talking about Babe Ruth so I was going with pitching norms during his timeframe. If you wanted to go back further, there were players like John Clarkson, Pud Galvin, and Old Hoss Radbourn throwing over 620 innings in multiple seasons back in the 1880s. They would throw every other day, and sometimes both games of a doubleheader like you are talking about. Now very few pitchers even get to 200 innings in a season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • tmichae10_PSNT Offline
    tmichae10_PSNT Offline
    tmichae10_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #26

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Believe the saying is hitting 1 out of 3 will get you to the HOF.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • xXCHAOSmnkyXx_PSNX Offline
    xXCHAOSmnkyXx_PSNX Offline
    xXCHAOSmnkyXx_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #27

    Have they released Jack Leiter yet? How about now...now,no....how about now

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • BloopNaBlast_34_PSNB Offline
    BloopNaBlast_34_PSNB Offline
    BloopNaBlast_34_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #28

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    I mean this is all fantasy

    Lets not pretend that Babe Ruth would be able to hit Jacob Degrome or Verlander.

    There is this idea that a legend of the past can hang with today's stars it's not happening so FS just adds in to what is just on big What If mode

    You can’t be serious. If you drop Babe in right now? No probably not, but let’s say Baby Ruth popped out around the time Trouty was born then yeah he would be right there if not better. It’s hard to compare that era to now, but the training regime is night and day difference. Babes regime was cigars, milkshakes, and hotdogs. But you are right in a way.. it is all fantasy, but at least Babe or any legend has numbers to back it up.

    cdnmoneymaker93_MLBTSC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • cdnmoneymaker93_MLBTSC Offline
    cdnmoneymaker93_MLBTSC Offline
    cdnmoneymaker93_MLBTS
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #29

    @bloopnablast_34_psn said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @poksey_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    @cdnmoneymaker93_mlbts said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    So about 1 in 3 future star cards pan out or exceed expectations.

    Thats actually not that bad in reality

    Ok. So if that's where we are at, why not have insanely juiced HOF cards too? Instead of some unrealistic projection of what a player that never played in the majors could be in three years, let's have a "what if Babe Ruth had 96 speed" card. What if Keith Hernandez never did cocaine card. Orlando Hernandez throwing from 15 different arm slots, but now he throws screwballs that break like a slider.

    Let's just max out every single card so people never have to worry about DiVeRsItY ever again. Trevor Hoffman throwing 102 mph sinkers, Ted Williams as a switch hitter. Topps Now and Future Stars arent too far from that ridiculousness. I guess we should embrace it, max out every single card, and now everyone can have whatever lineup they want with no limitations.

    I mean this is all fantasy

    Lets not pretend that Babe Ruth would be able to hit Jacob Degrome or Verlander.

    There is this idea that a legend of the past can hang with today's stars it's not happening so FS just adds in to what is just on big What If mode

    You can’t be serious. If you drop Babe in right now? No probably not, but let’s say Baby Ruth popped out around the time Trouty was born then yeah he would be right there if not better. It’s hard to compare that era to now, but the training regime is night and day difference. Babes regime was cigars, milkshakes, and hotdogs. But you are right in a way.. it is all fantasy, but at least Babe or any legend has numbers to back it up.

    So your argument to counter act my claim about this all being fantasy is to consider a fantasy where Babe Ruth was born in today's Era how he would preform?

    Isnt that what this game is doing by creating these fantasy match up?

    Thanks for supporting my point

    BloopNaBlast_34_PSNB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Ikasnu_PSNI Offline
    Ikasnu_PSNI Offline
    Ikasnu_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    I don't remember a Garrett Hampson future stars card.

    nymets1987_PSNN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • nymets1987_PSNN Offline
    nymets1987_PSNN Offline
    nymets1987_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #31

    @ikasnu_psn said in Since We're Talking About Future Stars ... A 2018 Review:

    I don't remember a Garrett Hampson future stars card.

    I love that Topps Now card been using in NL West team alot

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

X Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitch Discord TikTok
Major League Baseball Players Association Major League Baseball Sony Interactive Entertainment PlayStation Studios San Diego Studio ESRB ESRB Certificate
Terms of Use Privacy Policy TheShow.com Community Code of Conduct MLB The Show Online Code of Conduct MLB The Show Games

Stubs is a registered trademark or trademark of Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

"PlayStation Family Mark", "PlayStation", "PS5 Logo", and "PS4 Logo" are registered trademarks or trademarks of Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.

Microsoft, the Xbox Sphere mark, Series X|S logo, and Xbox Series X|S are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.

Nintendo Switch is a trademark of Nintendo.

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com. The Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc., as applicable. Visit the official website of the Hall of Fame at BaseballHall.org

Officially Licensed Product of MLB Players, Inc. MLBPA trademarks, copyrighted works and other intellectual property rights are owned and/or held by MLBPA and may not be used without the written consent of MLBPA or MLB Players, Inc. Visit MLBPLAYERS.com, the Players Choice on the web.

© 2024 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.