Number of questions about DD mechanics
-
This thread has now been intentionally ignored for 39 days.
-
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
-
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
Lol
-
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
Lol
I mean, I'm not wrong am I? Scroll up and you can see the removed comments. Yet not a beep for almost 40 days regarding this topic. Embarrassing.
-
@raesONE_PSN
That was part of why I went on that tirade. If they removed the comments and didn't comment the.selves it was definitive prove that they just don't give a [censored] about their customers. They were already here, it would've taken what? An additional 20 seconds to comment "answers coming soon" or "sorry guys no answers" -
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
Lol
I mean, I'm not wrong am I? Scroll up and you can see the removed comments. Yet not a beep for almost 40 days regarding this
They have made it pretty obvious that either they can't or they just don't want to answer this thread.
-
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
Lol
I mean, I'm not wrong am I? Scroll up and you can see the removed comments. Yet not a beep for almost 40 days regarding this
They have made it pretty obvious that either they can't or they just don't want to answer this thread.
In both situations this whole thing could very easily be dismantled by just saying so. There is literally no downside to that.
-
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
Lol
I mean, I'm not wrong am I? Scroll up and you can see the removed comments. Yet not a beep for almost 40 days regarding this
They have made it pretty obvious that either they can't or they just don't want to answer this thread.
In both situations this whole thing could very easily be dismantled by just saying so. There is literally no downside to that.
They don't feel the need to respond or they aren't allowed to. When people on this thread start calling for sds heads it isn't a good look on this side of the argument either. Both sides come off as childish at times. Keep it professional. You have told them time after time how they are treating its customers like garbage and I get it. But ya know what? A very tiny percentage of the consumer base knows about this forum and an even smaller percentage actually follow it. Secondly, everyone on this thread is going to buy mlb 22. Everyone can whine and moan and threaten never to return just like every other year. Sds knows its all a bluff mainly because its the only baseball game in town and their content drops are unlike any other sports franchise. Not picking sides, just seems like this thread is the same people everyday saying the same things over and over again and sds couldn't care less or they are being told not to reply and get into an analytics discussion on a public forum.
-
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
Lol
I mean, I'm not wrong am I? Scroll up and you can see the removed comments. Yet not a beep for almost 40 days regarding this
They have made it pretty obvious that either they can't or they just don't want to answer this thread.
In both situations this whole thing could very easily be dismantled by just saying so. There is literally no downside to that.
They don't feel the need to respond or they aren't allowed to. When people on this thread start calling for sds heads it isn't a good look on this side of the argument either. Both sides come off as childish at times. Keep it professional. You have told them time after time how they are treating its customers like garbage and I get it. But ya know what? A very tiny percentage of the consumer base knows about this forum and an even smaller percentage actually follow it. Secondly, everyone on this thread is going to buy mlb 22. Everyone can whine and moan and threaten never to return just like every other year. Sds knows its all a bluff mainly because its the only baseball game in town and their content drops are unlike any other sports franchise. Not picking sides, just seems like this thread is the same people everyday saying the same things over and over again and sds couldn't care less or they are being told not to reply and get into an analytics discussion on a public forum.
Keep it professional he says. Professionalism would be to respond on such a simple matter, any type of response would do. Besides, who made you the PR person for these mods? I can't remember asking for your opinion or your validation about this thread, so do me a favor and leave this thread for what it is. Your take is clear, I've read it multiple times before. So thank you and now leave it to the actual people I'm addressing to respond.
-
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
Lol
I mean, I'm not wrong am I? Scroll up and you can see the removed comments. Yet not a beep for almost 40 days regarding this
They have made it pretty obvious that either they can't or they just don't want to answer this thread.
In both situations this whole thing could very easily be dismantled by just saying so. There is literally no downside to that.
They don't feel the need to respond or they aren't allowed to. When people on this thread start calling for sds heads it isn't a good look on this side of the argument either. Both sides come off as childish at times. Keep it professional. You have told them time after time how they are treating its customers like garbage and I get it. But ya know what? A very tiny percentage of the consumer base knows about this forum and an even smaller percentage actually follow it. Secondly, everyone on this thread is going to buy mlb 22. Everyone can whine and moan and threaten never to return just like every other year. Sds knows its all a bluff mainly because its the only baseball game in town and their content drops are unlike any other sports franchise. Not picking sides, just seems like this thread is the same people everyday saying the same things over and over again and sds couldn't care less or they are being told not to reply and get into an analytics discussion on a public forum.
Keep it professional he says. Professionalism would be to respond on such a simple matter, any type of response would do. Besides, who made you the PR person for these mods? I can't remember asking for your opinion or your validation about this thread, so do me a favor and leave this thread for what it is. Your take is clear, I've read it multiple times before. So thank you and now leave it to the actual people I'm addressing to respond.
Lol, that's totally fine- that's an answer too.
-
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
You guys have time to remove @Kovz88_PSN comments in this thread, but not to give us a simple response?
I'm finding it harder and harder to not interpret this as big "F*ck you" in our direction. You should do better, we're not asking for anything special over here.
Lol
I mean, I'm not wrong am I? Scroll up and you can see the removed comments. Yet not a beep for almost 40 days regarding this
They have made it pretty obvious that either they can't or they just don't want to answer this thread.
In both situations this whole thing could very easily be dismantled by just saying so. There is literally no downside to that.
They don't feel the need to respond or they aren't allowed to. When people on this thread start calling for sds heads it isn't a good look on this side of the argument either. Both sides come off as childish at times. Keep it professional. You have told them time after time how they are treating its customers like garbage and I get it. But ya know what? A very tiny percentage of the consumer base knows about this forum and an even smaller percentage actually follow it. Secondly, everyone on this thread is going to buy mlb 22. Everyone can whine and moan and threaten never to return just like every other year. Sds knows its all a bluff mainly because its the only baseball game in town and their content drops are unlike any other sports franchise. Not picking sides, just seems like this thread is the same people everyday saying the same things over and over again and sds couldn't care less or they are being told not to reply and get into an analytics discussion on a public forum.
Keep it professional he says. Professionalism would be to respond on such a simple matter, any type of response would do. Besides, who made you the PR person for these mods? I can't remember asking for your opinion or your validation about this thread, so do me a favor and leave this thread for what it is. Your take is clear, I've read it multiple times before. So thank you and now leave it to the actual people I'm addressing to respond.
Lol, that's totally fine- that's an answer too.
Okay you've been very funny and witty, here's a cookie
. Now move along, you annoy me. -
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
... or they are being told not to reply and get into an analytics discussion on a public forum.
This is a good point, and I think the most likely scenario. There really isn't any upside for the devs to wade in and offer what will likely be deemed unsatisfactory answers to questions posed by a very small but largely unappeasable sampling of their customers.
Both sides come off as childish at times
Big understatement. While it may have started as an earnest request for information, it has since devolved into something else. Maybe those lobbing insults at those asked to assist and those generally acting like morons thought they were helping... there are ways to ensure that no one will want to help you, and, in that, this has been a master class.
-
@the_joneser_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
... or they are being told not to reply and get into an analytics discussion on a public forum.
This is a good point, and I think the most likely scenario. There really isn't any upside for the devs to wade in and offer what will likely be deemed unsatisfactory answers to questions posed by a very small but largely unappeasable sampling of their customers.
Both sides come off as childish at times
Big understatement. While it may have started as an earnest request for information, it has since devolved into something else. Maybe those lobbing insults at those asked to assist and those generally acting like morons thought they were helping... there are ways to ensure that no one will want to help you, and, in that, this has been a master class.
Let's stay on topic shall we?
-
@raesone_psn said in [Number of questions about DD mechanics]
Let's stay on topic shall we?
Pretty sure the horse is dead, champ.
-
@the_joneser_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in [Number of questions about DD mechanics]
Let's stay on topic shall we?
Pretty sure the horse is dead, champ.
Then stay out of this thread and mind your own business, champ.
-
@The_Joneser_PSN
@Collin_SDS_PSN responded to me a while ago and said he passed the questions along to more DD oriented people. Therefore we now expect some sort of follow up. Its been about a month since then and not even so much as acknowledgement. So if you aren't here to add a question or get answers then you are just being an [censored] -
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
Then stay out this thread and mind your own business, champ.
You could probably use a little work in dealing with opinions that diverge from your own, but ordering people out of a public thread is certainly one way of approaching that. I know you think yourself pretty important, but you're really kind of a pedant; I think you lack the self awareness to see that you come off like an [censored] hole much of the time, and you certainly seemed to have missed that you and some of your little friends here have effectively shot yourselves in the foot by not having the sense to maintain some decorum and curb your childish impulses. A shame, really, because it would have been nice to have some of those questions answered.
But, no worries. If it makes you happy, I'll just ignore this particular thread, too.
-
@the_joneser_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
@raesone_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
Then stay out this thread and mind your own business, champ.
You could probably use a little work in dealing with opinions that diverge from your own, but ordering people out of a public thread is certainly one way of approaching that. I know you think yourself pretty important, but you're really kind of a pedant; I think you lack the self awareness to see that you come off like an [censored] hole much of the time, and you certainly seemed to have missed that you and some of your little friends here have effectively shot yourselves in the foot by not having the sense to maintain some decorum and curb your childish impulses. A shame, really, because it would have been nice to have some of those questions answered.
But, no worries. If it makes you happy, I'll just ignore this particular thread, too.
Show me where I asked for any of your opinions? Oh wait, I didn't. Because I'm barely aware of your existence. I'm just gonna go ahead an add you to my block list so I'll have to spend even less energy on you and your unsolicited advice.
-
@The_Joneser_PSN
We get it, you thibk you're better than everyone. If you are such a master negotiator and you're interested in some answers feel free to show us how it's done. Having you come in here on your high horse is certainly a good way to get us answers in this thread so im sure you will have great success. Good luck -
@kovz88_psn said in Number of questions about DD mechanics:
…this year combined with the pitiful communication is just a giant [censored] embarrassment. I could forgive it if you at least had some form of communication but at this point you've backed yourselves into a corner where just about nothing you do could make you not look like a joke especially considering you can make an app and respond to game challenges from trolls but not respond to people with legitimate questions.
You got me, man - looks like you have a really good handle on subtle persuasion and delicately steering people to provide needed assistance. I’ll just step out of your handler’s private room here, and let you two aces continue to rack up the wins. I’m sure those devs are spending their holiday weekend writing up their responses… any minute now.
