Potential late game-breaking BR concept
-
Tldr: use classic pci, swing pretty much the moment the ball enters the pci
-
Interesting
-
But have you gone 12-0 with this method? I'm not saying this can't have limited success, I'm sure it does. But I wonder if it is a sustainable success if you get what I mean. I've been playing a lot of BR lately since there is nothing really left for me to do in 19, and I have started racking up wins, but can never finish it off, having made it to 10-0 in 2 of my last 4 tries. That's just from playing normally.
What is your sample size with this method?
-
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
-
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
But have you gone 12-0 with this method? I'm not saying this can't have limited success, I'm sure it does. But I wonder if it is a sustainable success if you get what I mean. I've been playing a lot of BR lately since there is nothing really left for me to do in 19, and I have started racking up wins, but can never finish it off, having made it to 10-0 in 2 of my last 4 tries. That's just from playing normally.
What is your sample size with this method?
That's why it's called a concept
-
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
-
This strategy has actually been around for years, albeit rarely talked about. It's called "center-swinging" and has been effective-ish in previous versions of the game as well. Some folks just use zone with the PCI off and essentially pretend they're using directional.
-
@Furious_Boogers said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
This strategy has actually been around for years, albeit rarely talked about. It's called "center-swinging" and has been effective-ish in previous versions of the game as well. Some folks just use zone with the PCI off and essentially pretend they're using directional.
Center swinging is definitely a thing but I'd consider this method a little more in depth because it requires pci placement, albeit not great placement
-
My most recent game was the culmination of everything I've wanted to prove, I scored 12 runs in 2 innings while only centering 3 balls(I was counting), the chaos was beautiful.
Time to replicate it
-
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
-
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you
-
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you
You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size. -
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you
You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size.@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you
You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size.You said "I wonder if it's sustainable success", calm down just a little
I have played in only 8 games while working on it and right now I have experienced a slightly disappointing 6-2 so far
There is still optimism because I am seeing way too many hard hits on bad pci, including a game where I scored 12 in 2 innings that I had talked about in a previous independent post on the thread
I called it a concept because it is. I called it potentially game breaking because it is, in fact, potentially game breaking
There is now sample size and quality of play listed, I hope this works for you but if you have more questions I will answer because I want this to be a big project for me
-
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you
You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size.@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you
You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size.You said "I wonder if it's sustainable success", calm down just a little
I have played in only 8 games while working on it and right now I have experienced a slightly disappointing 6-2 so far
There is still optimism because I am seeing way too many hard hits on bad pci, including a game where I scored 12 in 2 innings that I had talked about in a previous independent post on the thread
I called it a concept because it is. I called it potentially game breaking because it is, in fact, potentially game breaking
There is now sample size and quality of play listed, I hope this works for you but if you have more questions I will answer because I want this to be a big project for me
I just don't understand why you got so defensive, I just asked some questions because I was curious, and I asked about sustainable success and sample size. Sure, you didn't quote me when saying "some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says", but we both know you were referring to me along with Delicates.
You're a cool dude and I've always like your forums posts, I was just asking some relevant questions to get a better understanding of the idea. It's an interesting idea and I look forward to hearing more about it, .
If you thought I had any other intention or if I somehow put a tone in those comments when I didn't mean it that way, I apologize.
-
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you
You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size.@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:
My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.
You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.
I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine
This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says
I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.
I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you
You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size.You said "I wonder if it's sustainable success", calm down just a little
I have played in only 8 games while working on it and right now I have experienced a slightly disappointing 6-2 so far
There is still optimism because I am seeing way too many hard hits on bad pci, including a game where I scored 12 in 2 innings that I had talked about in a previous independent post on the thread
I called it a concept because it is. I called it potentially game breaking because it is, in fact, potentially game breaking
There is now sample size and quality of play listed, I hope this works for you but if you have more questions I will answer because I want this to be a big project for me
I just don't understand why you got so defensive, I just asked some questions because I was curious, and I asked about sustainable success and sample size. Sure, you didn't quote me when saying "some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says", but we both know you were referring to me along with Delicates.
You're a cool dude and I've always like your forums posts, I was just asking some relevant questions to get a better understanding of the idea. It's an interesting idea and I look forward to hearing more about it, .
If you thought I had any other intention or if I somehow put a tone in those comments when I didn't mean it that way, I apologize.
I was planning on apologizing for coming off how I did when you posted again
I get really obsessive over these things, I don't want to make excuses, I'm sorry
-
A admin locked this topic on
