Rollins Reviews
-
@joester33 said in Rollins Reviews:
I'm bummed out i couldnt hit a lick with him 76 ab i only hit .158 12 hits had to sell him
Your the only person I’ve seen not mashing with him I not doing online cause I’ve been at the lake and I’m playing on a hotspot
-
@joester33 said in Rollins Reviews:
I'm bummed out i couldnt hit a lick with him 76 ab i only hit .158 12 hits had to sell him
I can't hit a lick with him yet either, but I'm going to keep trying for now, besides, his D is amazing
-
So torn between Rollins and Musial. At this point I will probably just pick one and buy the other.
-
MUSIAL on the other hand is Smashing it for me got him @ 1sts base
-
He hits great, but most people who love him tend to be a tad late on pitches with other cards. His swing is so fast, you will be early on everything until you learn to sit back just a bit longer. Took me about 100 AB's to remind myself to wait longer with him, but when you make good contact, the ball flies off his bat.
-
I picked him, only a few event games but been as I expected, awesome.
-
@lucas8181 said in Rollins Reviews:
He hits great, but most people who love him tend to be a tad late on pitches with other cards. His swing is so fast, you will be early on everything until you learn to sit back just a bit longer. Took me about 100 AB's to remind myself to wait longer with him, but when you make good contact, the ball flies off his bat.
That’s fine i Tend to be late becuase I play a bunch of offline. That actually helps!
-
He's already saved enough runs for him to be worth more than Banks on my squad, plus he's hitting pretty well. He gets doubles and triples and he's had two or three really good home runs for me in limited online action. Plus most singles turn into doubles with his base stealing.
-
I've struggled with him, unfortunately mostly on the event too, but I'll keep him there because of the d and switch hitting
-
@doomtrain69 said in Rollins Reviews:
He's already saved enough runs for him to be worth more than Banks on my squad, plus he's hitting pretty well. He gets doubles and triples and he's had two or three really good home runs for me in limited online action. Plus most singles turn into doubles with his base stealing.
Exactly. I would be fine if he hit .125 with his defense. Of course, if he only hit .125, I'd get the wizard and save the stubs
-
@lucas8181 said in Rollins Reviews:
@doomtrain69 said in Rollins Reviews:
He's already saved enough runs for him to be worth more than Banks on my squad, plus he's hitting pretty well. He gets doubles and triples and he's had two or three really good home runs for me in limited online action. Plus most singles turn into doubles with his base stealing.
Exactly. I would be fine if he hit .125 with his defense. Of course, if he only hit .125, I'd get the wizard and save the stubs
I hit .400 w Ozzie and just put in Hanley when there was a lefty
-
I really like his card. I bought him and Stan since I had the stubs laying around.
Biggio CF
Trout RF
Belli LF
Sandberg 3rd
J Roll SS
Mondesi Potm 2B
Stan 1st
Cap at catcher. -
@GoHardGrandpa said in Rollins Reviews:
I really like his card. I bought him and Stan since I had the stubs laying around.
Biggio CF
Trout RF
Belli LF
Sandberg 3rd
J Roll SS
Mondesi Potm 2B
Stan 1st
Cap at catcher.You still really using mondesis silver hitting?
-
He is awesome. My lineup currently. Speed at the top helps so much
- 99 Jackie 3B
- 99 Rollins SS
- 99 Adell CF
- 97 HRD Cano 2B
- 99 FOTF Kaline LF
- 99 Musial 1B
- 99 Posey C
- 99 Larry Walker RF
-
@WarriorsAreCool7 said in Rollins Reviews:
@TheHungryHole said in Rollins Reviews:
@The_Canuckler said in Rollins Reviews:
Rollins is the best SS in the game
is ozzie smith a poor mans rollins?
Ozzie is really good I hit .400 with him in 100 abs only weakness in his card is lefty’s
yeah buddy i have never taken him out of SS too he is so clutch for me
-
5 hits away from prestige he’s my SS until someone better comes along
-
Having a hard time deciding what to do. I want the Musial card, but i currently am running Jackie at second and sandberg at short. Sandberg at short is a liability, but just dont have that stud SS yet.
-
@TEXAS10PT said in Rollins Reviews:
@MLBTHEJOE said in Rollins Reviews:
@TEXAS10PT said in Rollins Reviews:
@MLBTHEJOE said in Rollins Reviews:
- C Biggio
- LF Walker
3.CF Mantle
4.LF Jose Ramirez(Finest)
5.1B Eric Thames(Potm)
6.SS Rollins
7.3B Brett
8.2B Jackie Robinson
I see you have J Ram in the cleanup spot. I raked with him in the slow pitch version of 18. Does he still crush like back then? I am coming up on 25 Prestige and was considering him first but might want to take Springer and make an all Astros team....I know I know Cheatstros but hey I live in Houston LOL,
I’m actually a defender of the Astros. They are the team I root for in the postseason. Since I’m a depressed tigers fan right now. Lol. And Verlander is my favorite player of all time so i started to like the rest of the Astros players the more I watched them. Anyways I picked Ramirez first and he was crushing the ball over the fence even when the PCI wasn’t on the ball. It was only on all-star. I really want that springer card tho. I honestly would have picked Springer at the time, but Ramirez had the positional flexibility and was a switch-hitter. I actually had Ramirez playing first base until I got Thames. It’s a tough pick no doubt. I guess it depends on your line up and who you need. But being an Astros fan I would pick Springer Dinger! Because when I get Springer(I’m at prestige 86) Ramirez is going to move to the bench and I’m putting springer in center and moving Mickey to left
NICE!!!!!
I'm waiting to see if the new 97 Altuve comes down in price a little but I know I will get him and then have a line up like thisC 99 Biggio
1B 99 Bagwell
2B 97 Altuve
3B 87 Bregman
SS 95 Correa
LF 80 Alvarez
CF 99 Springer
RF 80 BrantleyDiamond SP's
93 Oswalt
92 Ryan
92 Urquidy
90 VerlanderJust need to get 99 Scott
Sorry OP for hijacking your post
There is a 96 Brantley. It's an Indians card, but I'm going to use it on my Astros build.
-
@sbevans142 said in Rollins Reviews:
@TEXAS10PT said in Rollins Reviews:
@MLBTHEJOE said in Rollins Reviews:
@TEXAS10PT said in Rollins Reviews:
@MLBTHEJOE said in Rollins Reviews:
- C Biggio
- LF Walker
3.CF Mantle
4.LF Jose Ramirez(Finest)
5.1B Eric Thames(Potm)
6.SS Rollins
7.3B Brett
8.2B Jackie Robinson
I see you have J Ram in the cleanup spot. I raked with him in the slow pitch version of 18. Does he still crush like back then? I am coming up on 25 Prestige and was considering him first but might want to take Springer and make an all Astros team....I know I know Cheatstros but hey I live in Houston LOL,
I’m actually a defender of the Astros. They are the team I root for in the postseason. Since I’m a depressed tigers fan right now. Lol. And Verlander is my favorite player of all time so i started to like the rest of the Astros players the more I watched them. Anyways I picked Ramirez first and he was crushing the ball over the fence even when the PCI wasn’t on the ball. It was only on all-star. I really want that springer card tho. I honestly would have picked Springer at the time, but Ramirez had the positional flexibility and was a switch-hitter. I actually had Ramirez playing first base until I got Thames. It’s a tough pick no doubt. I guess it depends on your line up and who you need. But being an Astros fan I would pick Springer Dinger! Because when I get Springer(I’m at prestige 86) Ramirez is going to move to the bench and I’m putting springer in center and moving Mickey to left
NICE!!!!!
I'm waiting to see if the new 97 Altuve comes down in price a little but I know I will get him and then have a line up like thisC 99 Biggio
1B 99 Bagwell
2B 97 Altuve
3B 87 Bregman
SS 95 Correa
LF 80 Alvarez
CF 99 Springer
RF 80 BrantleyDiamond SP's
93 Oswalt
92 Ryan
92 Urquidy
90 VerlanderJust need to get 99 Scott
Sorry OP for hijacking your post
There is a 96 Brantley. It's an Indians card, but I'm going to use it on my Astros build.
True and if I went that route I could put 99 Eddie Mathews at 3B. He played there for 101 games in 1967
-
A admin locked this topic on
