Betts trade
-
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
we got verdugo
I mean technically nobody got anyone right now....as the trade is on hold due to Brusdar Graterol's medical review....Stay educated.
-
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
we got verdugo
I mean technically nobody got anyone right now....as the trade is on hold due to Brusdar Graterol's medical review....Stay educated.
WE ARE EDUCATED
-
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
we got verdugo
I mean technically nobody got anyone right now....as the trade is on hold due to Brusdar Graterol's medical review....Stay educated.
WE ARE EDUCATED
Wait, so now @Dclnnn is more than one person....weird.
-
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
we got verdugo
I mean technically nobody got anyone right now....as the trade is on hold due to Brusdar Graterol's medical review....Stay educated.
WE ARE EDUCATED
Wait, so now @Dclnnn is more than one person....weird.
we got verdugo bud
-
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
we got verdugo
I mean technically nobody got anyone right now....as the trade is on hold due to Brusdar Graterol's medical review....Stay educated.
WE ARE EDUCATED
Wait, so now @Dclnnn is more than one person....weird.
we got verdugo bud
Who is we?
-
@LankyRyan said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
@LankyRyan said in Betts trade:
I'd be bummed if I were a Sox fan. If this isn't a white flag for 2020, I don't know what is.
I am definitely bummed in that regard, but I feel @CONman1505 touched on what we should be happy about...it was a trade that needed to get done to help us going forward...as much as we want to compete in 2020, it would have kept us from competing further in future years
I understand the need to replenish the farm system in today's overvaluing of farm systems. It's interesting that from the sidelines, we're now seeing things from the billionaires' fiscally shrewd perspective, when not that long ago, all of these problems were easily solved in free agency. Teams used to be willing to compensate for a weak farm system by making a splash on the free agent market, and I think in recent years, we've become conditioned to make sense of things in dollar signs and controllable years. At the core of it, none of that should matter. Each and every team can afford to spend in order to win, and I don't understand the new climate of celebrating teams for taking extra effort to avoid winning now in order to maybe win later.
I grew up a Giants fan and couldn't imagine defending my team if they traded Barry Bonds away for two prospects. This trade was great for Dodger fans, good for Twins fans, but should be seen as terrible by Sox fans.
The changed how the Luxury tax works a few years ago, If you are over the Luxury tax for Multiple years it a bigger payment. Owners are trying to stay below the Luxury tax. The Dodgers and the Yankees both got under the luxury tax I believe last season t avoid bigger penalties. I believe the Yankees are back over and will pay this year. While the dodger have gotten rid of the dead money they owned to players that have not played for them in years. Dodger will stay under even with the Trade they should be under. -
Sorry for my bad grammar in that last post
-
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
@cvogsfashow said in Betts trade:
@Dclnnn said in Betts trade:
we got verdugo
I mean technically nobody got anyone right now....as the trade is on hold due to Brusdar Graterol's medical review....Stay educated.
WE ARE EDUCATED
Wait, so now @Dclnnn is more than one person....weird.
we got verdugo bud
Who is we?
we
-
@LankyRyan said in Betts trade:
@pogibana said in Betts trade:
For those FA enthusiasts I will just say A-Rod, Puljos and Prince Fielder. As far as David price is concerned he is an overpaid has been. His FB that used to be 95-97 MPH is now 90-93 and has been injured half of his time in Bosto Personally I am glad to see him go. As far as FA, I think the money is getting out of hand. Players should get paid for what they do not for what they did.
You're cherry picking examples here. Even so, I agree that 10+ year deals usually don't end well. In just about every job on Earth, past experience and past performance plays a huge role in determining your value to not only your employer, but yourself. In baseball, valuation is derived from taking past results and translating that into forecasted future production, with variance built in. How do you recommend valuing players if you're saying arbitration and free agency aren't currently doing it correctly?
I say give every player a base salary just for discussion lets say $2M per year then pay insentives for production. For a position player say for having a .300 BA you get $4M, 30HR $4M, 100 RBI $5M etc. Then at the end of the season if they get the gold glove give another bonus, silver slugger another bonus and MVP another bonus. The same with pitchers SP get say $5M for 200 SO, $4M for 200 innings pitched, etc. End of year Cy Young get bonus MVP bonus etc. That way they get paid for what they do. This pay can be from year one. So teams are not getting great production from a great young player for 3 years for peanuts then later some team is paying huge money for a has been.
-