Update 1.13 Discussion
-
@eatyum said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
@bempfis said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
@bhall09 said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
@Victor_SDS can you just clarify one thing: does this affect the way we hit or is it just a change in the feedback we see?
Clarification isn't needed, re-read the patch notes. Nowhere is it stated that changes have been made to hitting.
I'm not sure, the wording is a bit confusing, like this
"The new system accounts for these nuances in a more reliable way. Better hitters should now generate more 'Good' hits, and 'Good' hits are more consistently valuable than they were in the previous system"I think we do need clarification.
Right, which falls under their "improvements" to the contact result. So it's basically another feedback change.
-
Love the pitching changes from what I read. But as far as the hitting goes, I don’t think this does much. Will have to see if it just makes the feedback actually respond to the input. I will laugh if people are still hitting home runs on swings where the ball is barely even touching the pci.
-
All in favor of releasing the patch now?? Lol
-
I'm cautiously optimistic but, I am glad to see SDS attempting to fix this game.
-
I think hitting engine was not touched, feedback windows show more information so we can understand the physics in why we suck lol
-
@Ricky_Bobby11806 said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
I think hitting engine was not touched, feedback windows show more information so we can understand the physics in why we suck lol
Lmao. Patch notes kinda reads like "here's a second screen to show you why you should STFU and accept the good/okay good sir" hey I'm down for all the transparency in the world so I applaud them for this
-
In 4 years plus this was the only update that actually sounds good. Every patch was some nonsense menu fix or a stadium ad being corrected etc. This actually seems to address hitting feedback. I guess in 4 more years we will have pitching updated as well. All pitching methods should have similar results. Good timing should the same for pitching as does hitting.
-
@JChilds213 said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
From what I read it looks like you guys are really listings I was waiting for lunch angle to be added in the feed back
Lunch angle?lol
-
This patch appears to fix nothing in the hitting engine, just shows you why you got the result you did....problem is good/okay contact on balls right down the middle with good timing with the ball in the center of the pci is going to make the hitting engine look like even more of an rng joke when getting good Okay’d lmao!
-
@squishiesgirl said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
@JChilds213 said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
From what I read it looks like you guys are really listings I was waiting for lunch angle to be added in the feed back
Lunch angle?lol
Squishie why you pickin on these men’s spelling? You went back and changed the “p” in ”forgpt” to an “o” now making it “forgot” P for an O I’d say your PO’d
-
This does absolutely nothing for horrible gameplay lmaooooooo more detail for me good/okay and my pitches still go down the middle
-
@Jeviduty said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
@Ricky_Bobby11806 said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
I think hitting engine was not touched, feedback windows show more information so we can understand the physics in why we suck lol
Lmao. Patch notes kinda reads like "here's a second screen to show you why you should STFU and accept the good/okay good sir" hey I'm down for all the transparency in the world so I applaud them for this
I totally support more feedback. It's hard to improve when the feedback leads to both good and awful outcomes lol.
-
Can’t wait to see how it goes
-
I really hope this update is more than adding more info to swing analysis. A You know the old "Lipstick on a pig". Also not sure how i feel about adding wind online to an already inconsistent hitting system. Just feels like another excuse as to why my p/p flyball with 100+ power batter is only warning track worthy. Again"Lipstick on a pig". With all that said I'll hold judgment until a significant amount of playing time and will definitely applaud you guys for making such a drastic update/change when you could of easily mailed it in.
-
I hope this patch makes online casuals happy.
-
@j9milz said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
I really hope this update is more than adding more info to swing analysis. You know the old "Lipstick on a pig". Also not sure how i feel about adding wind online to an already inconsistent hitting system. Just feels like another excuse as to why my p/p flyball with 100+ power batter is only warning track worthy. Again"Lipstick on a pig". With all that said I'll hold judgment until a significant amount of playing time and will definitely applaud you guys for making such a drastic update/change when you could of easily mailed it in.
-
Time will tell but aside from the starting pitcher stamina, it sounds mostly like spin doctoring.
-
Yep a lot of this tracks with what I suspected. Very nice to finally have this info.
There's way too much nuance in batted balls that can be perfectly summarized with a couple adjectives, which I think is what was causing a lot of the frustration. For instance, I saw a big time streamer the other day hit an inside fastball to the opposite field for a flyout, but because he got his PCI over the center of it, it was a "good/good." And so he threw a gigantic hissy fit about how the game was out to get him. But how often do you see a player inside-out a pitch for a home run?
I think a lot of the indignation this year is the result of genuine good/goods being lumped into the same category as inferior good/goods because of a lack of descriptors.
It's like if your friend tells you a restaurant is good. Do you just head straight there without learning anything else about it? You'd want to know what kind of food they serve and if it matches up with your particular tastes. You'd want to know your friend's tastes and what they consider good. You'd want to know what to order. If you had to choose to go to every restaurant based on if it's good or okay, you'd be disappointed a lot.
-
Now we’re differentiating between good/goods ?
What’s next? A perfect good/good and an ok good/good?
-
@Victor_SDS said in Update 1.13 Discussion:
Discussion focused on the 1.13 update.
Notes can be found here.I ask that you please keep feedback - positive or negative - constructive and respectful. Thank you.
Looks good, wish they would have included hot/cold zones on input window. It would limit the people complaining that they didn’t hit the ball 600 ft on a perfect perfect swing.
