I'm convinced...
-
I would see your point if this was November and someone had 100 loses then yes. When its mid may and you already have 100 loses you arent a good player. But the game caters to those players
-
@Weshill627 said in I'm convinced...:
I would see your point if this was November and someone had 100 loses then yes. When its mid may and you already have 100 loses you arent a good player. But the game caters to those players
If the game caters to bad players, that means bad players win a lot.
Therefore since you are 69-31, you must be a bad player and that's why you have a good record, the game is catering to you.Your logic is that the game caters to bad players and helps them win, so therefore, it is catering to you since you win alot.
-
@Weshill627 said in I'm convinced...:
I think anyone who has 100+ loses are not good players. I had 80 loses at the end of 19. I was top 200. The latest patch secretly helped people with over 100 loses. And yes I believe it is a perk for a power/contact boost once you get 100 loses
What if you were 500-100?
-
Yeah I’ve noticed records don’t matter so much. Sometimes the game decides it wants somebody to score runs and that’s what happens. Not much control that we have.
-
When I can throw a cg shut out against someone who has 40 loses but be 0-4 today against someone with 100+ loses there is a problem with that. And I believe you are mediocre once you get to 100 loses no matter what....
-
@Weshill627 said in I'm convinced...:
I think anyone who has 100+ loses are not good players. I had 80 loses at the end of 19. I was top 200. The latest patch secretly helped people with over 100 loses. And yes I believe it is a perk for a power/contact boost once you get 100 loses
Are you wearing a hat made of tin foil?
-
This is absurd
-
I wish it was absurd Jack....but if you watched my game play over this past week you'd start to believe what I'm saying
-
@Weshill627 said in I'm convinced...:
I wish it was absurd Jack....but if you watched my game play over this past week you'd start to believe what I'm saying
Lol you could be right. This is one of the crazier conspiracies I've seen on this forum, and there have been A LOT of conspiracies on this forum.
-
The way I've been losing to people with bad records is crazy. Lol
-
This is top 10 dumbest forum post, and there have been some great ones.
-
Hey Paladin, you may be right. But it seems all my loses come against people with 100+ loses. I think its legit.
-
The game doesn’t help guys with 100+ Ls. It just feels like that to you sometimes the rng does cater to one player more than the other but that goes both ways record doesn’t matter.
-
Bro. If you've seen how I've lost today alone you'd start to believe it.
-
I don't even look at records. I hit the button before I see it. I've gotten smacked by 10 year olds with bad records, beat people with good records. I'm 20+ games over .500 WITH 100+ Losses, I don't lose sleep over it, its a game. At the end of the day my MLBTS W\L record means nothing in the "Real world" I have plenty of real life accomplishment to look upon.
-
A lot has to do with latency...your opponents today might have been on the right side of it.
-
@Weshill627 said in I'm convinced...:
I have a 69-31 record. It is becoming more convincing that anyone with over 100 loses in ranked get a contact boost or something because they seem to launch the ball off me. I can throw a CG shut out against someone with 40 loses but as soon as I match up with someone with over 100 loses I lose and I've gone from 880 at 9 am this morning to 835 currently because I get match up with mediocre players and lose. I wish they would admit it.
This makes zero sense, maybe you just aren’t as good as the other player?
-
You should see how I've lost lol
-
@Weshill627 said in I'm convinced...:
You should see how I've lost lol
The same way we all lose i'm gussing? Opponent scores more runs than you.
-
Lol true
