Would you support this?
-
Dude multiple threads not needed. And no. Not only no because no .. but no because it is 100000% not going to happen. Stupid question. Stupid idea. Stupid poll. Thank you.
-
@DubbyDubbs said in Would you support this?:
Dude multiple threads not needed. And no. Not only no because no .. but no because it is 100000% not going to happen. Stupid question. Stupid idea. Stupid poll. Thank you.
I never asked under the presumption that it would/might happen; I just asked whether you would support it that's all. No need to be so bitter.
-
lmao just go play 19 then wtf?
-
@NYS012 said in Would you support this?:
@DubbyDubbs said in Would you support this?:
Dude multiple threads not needed. And no. Not only no because no .. but no because it is 100000% not going to happen. Stupid question. Stupid idea. Stupid poll. Thank you.
I never asked under the presumption that it would/might happen; I just asked whether you would support it that's all. No need to be so bitter.
Okay. Put me down as the first "no" then. Thanks.
-
@HustlinOwl said in Would you support this?:
lmao just go play 19 then wtf?
- That's not what I'm asking. 2. Playing the show 19 with no one on it and with a bunch of 99 cards in the game is very much different from playing the show 20.
-
No thanks, way more lineouts in 19. Perfect-perfect really does make a difference in 20. I've moved on from getting upset about defense, just worry about getting the next out.
-