Community Forum

No. I have early access and none of the '22 stadiums are there. In the "vault", everything I uploaded into '23 is there (but none of '22).

Major improvement, in my opinion, but '22 stadiums are gone for good it seems.

@thinkbluedgr_psn said in Who's House? Rams House!!!:

@sunjah_psn said in Who's House? Rams House!!!:

General Discussion forum for MLB the Show 22 is NOT really the place for a congratulations to the Super Bowl Champions.

Wrong Sport
Wrong Medium
Wrong PLACE

is life really that hard to understand?

You must have been the hall monitor in school. smh

No, but I once spent $Hundreds of Dollars to see a tournament in another part of the world, and some idiot destroyed it all because I logged on to Operation Sports>MLB the SHOW, and the idiot posted the results.

It was soccer, and he posted it on general discussion in MLB the SHOW. Hundreds of dollars on a teacher's salary 100% wasted because of that 20 years ago!

Maybe think of others sometimes? Did your post just ruin the superbowl for someone who taped it and then saw your message in a BASEBALL forum? Life would be so much better if people just considered others (even occasionally), but usually do not AT ALL!

@samguenther1987 said in Who's House? Rams House!!!:

@sunjah_psn said in Who's House? Rams House!!!:

General Discussion forum for MLB the Show 22 is NOT really the place for a congratulations to the Super Bowl Champions.

Wrong Sport
Wrong Medium
Wrong PLACE

is life really that hard to understand?

At least it's in general Discussion and not posted under DD, should it technically be in off topic? Sure, but why can't you just leave it be and move on.

Congrats to the Ram's, well deserved.

...Because I just woke up and the first thing I see while desperate for information on my favorite game is something about football.

I have the same question, why can't you just let it be. You saw a post and felt negative, so you posted. Same thing I did. It is okay for you but not others. C'mon...

@dap1234567890 said in General question for everyone who plays this game:

I have been playing this game and on this forum (and the previous one) for many years. I have seen SDS respond to some suggestions that have been placed in this forum. I believe there are four main reasons why there are so many "unanswered" suggestions on this forum.

• There are just way too many suggestions on here to answer them all!
• Some suggestions are viewed as being not a high enough priority for them to respond to the suggestion.
• There are some suggestions that are not feasible either through coding or due to time constraints.
• The way some people communicate their "suggestions" on here is done in a manner that does not deserve the time and effort to respond to those "suggestions" and are better off just being ignored.

You are right on those points, but the Opening Post is very correct ever since they introduced Diamond Dynasty. The only new mode is Road to the World Series (or whatever it is called), and that came in at the expense of one I used...seasons mode.

Not time or thought (or very minimal) ever goes towards the Franchise mode.

Best baseball game ever, but there is no doubt it is focused toward the on-line players, who then whine, cheat and complain about servers.

I want:
*Customizable leagues (16 teams playing 154 games...if I want...whatever anyone wants as in a league tailored for you)

*Customizable schedules

*The one thing no baseball game has ever had: realistic walks. The AI does not even try to get them (at any point). I get them and lead the league in walks, but they often swing so freely that late innings have 3-6 pitch innings because they walk up and swing for the fences, even when down five runs in the eighth...it is the only thing this game flat-out gets wrong!

*One extra Uniform Top for any made team (1 home, 1 road, and a third...can be only top, as that can be made to match bottom home/road)

*Any type of situation in which the CPU takes walks (both tries to do it, and makes my team's season total more than 173 while the rest of the league is 400+ at minimum, and usually up to 600 or so)

*Season Mode (40-man rosters only...not so detailed as to roster)

*World Baseball Classic

*Default sliders do not produce mass "HR:Run Scored" ratio; my team can hit HR's

*Adjustable manager sliders (such at LaRussa baseball back in the early 90's, or several other games that have had them previously)

*Did I mention walks?

I am not saying all of this, it would just be nice if one was added. Perhaps 1 a year. Instead, the only thing added during the PS4 stint was the condensed season thing that knocked "Seasons" off the game.

Very clearly, this game puts limited effort to improve franchise. It has now became a year-after-year thing, and is crushing when you see them putting other stuff in modes you wish were not in the game.

General Discussion forum for MLB the Show 22 is NOT really the place for a congratulations to the Super Bowl Champions.

Wrong Sport
Wrong Medium
Wrong PLACE

is life really that hard to understand?

No, you should not!

Greg Maddux (7-year span that matched or beat any other P in the history of the game...by a lot)
Walter Johnson
Jacob DeGrom
Tom Seaver
Christy Mathewson
(Honorable Mention: Cy Young...who else? Ok, Nolan Ryan, but that is IT!)

No, because I am adamantly against on-line games (for your reasons and a myriad of others).

I'll say it again; I wish they made 2 games. 1 for offline play, and 1 for DD. I don't have anything against the online community wanting to play, I just wish it didn't have to infect my favorite ball game of all time.

Seriously, how cool would that have been; Reds vs. Blues.

They were the Blues, too, before the Naps, and there was another Cleveland Blues in the 1880's. Missed opportunity...

I wanted the Expos to become the Grays when that whole thing happened.

I really don't mind Indians, I think of it more as a tribute to the culture than anything. I taught on a reservation in Montana a few years ago. Their mascot name? "The Indians". Surprised me, but I thought it was cool. The girl's team was "Lady Indians".

It really just isn't that big a deal.

"Tonight's matchup: Interstate rivals, Cleveland Blues visiting the Cincinnati Reds. It should be a good one," the announcer tells a TV audience waiting for the highly anticipated 2024 World Series Game #1.

What up, Hustlin'...you still hustlin', eh?

Reds, no question.

I was so mad they didn't change the Indians to the Blues. Cincinnati Reds vs. Cleveland Blues. Perfect. Not the "blues music/feeling" either, just "blues" the color. Perfectly opposite. They blew the chance horribly. Also, the Cle. Browns and the Cle. Blues. I don't get it. They actually started as the Blues for 1 season when baseball first started the AL.

I thought it was going to be Spiders, I really did. No offense to anyone, but "Guardians" just seems like a really bad choice. I think Blues would've been awesome, and Spiders okay.

I hope the Show 22 doesn't get rid of all evidence of the name like they did Chief Wahoo, as I will still have them as the Indians if the uniforms are there.

Sad moment, and it doesn't (to me) really accomplish anything but take away from the History of the Game.

Yes, you can search by name. Mostly, though, it is a mess in there. So many of the stadiums are just stupid with flying dinosaurs or 50 bridges and planes; they look stupid.

I have downloaded a few that people did well, but it seems few and far between when searching for what seem like they could be "real" ballparks. Most of it is pure junk and I gave up even looking months ago.

My custom ones are well done ones, or ones I've done myself. Such a great tool, but much is not worth your time in that vault.

It doesn't work right (after 11 years of it working correctly), so your insightful help is to "turn it off"?

If you are going to be that ridiculous, don't even reply to a post.

What is that supposed to do except say, "I shall make a comment which will not help anything, yet sound incredibly dumb!"

It seems as though "NO FEEDBACK" gives you results as if it were "QUADRANT" setting. I have been playing since '09 (or '08, can't remember which I started on), and 'no feedback' has always had, spoiler, NO feedback.

It just seems like somehow, the wires are crossed and you get quadrant feedback when it should be none.

Over half-way through this games yearly cycle, and it still has never been adressed in ANY fashion. I really do hate XBox, as it was never a problem when only a PS game.

Please for the love of GOD, make "NO FEEDBACK" give you 'no feedback."

PLEASE!!!

I dislike getting on a specific 'bandwagon', but from what I read, the change was made to appease the "on-line" community. I would be surprised if they changed it, as the 1st baseman still won't cover first on any OF hit for something like 5-straight years due to the whining from on-line players.

OF assist at first is a play that happens in real life every so often (lookin' your way, Casey), but since they changed it to stop a "cheesing" play in on-line games, it seems as though it will forever now be changed. Sorry, Furrillo, they don't care about your memory (or beating the Giants)!

I would expect now that this will never be changed.

Then DON'T play on-line rated!

Why would you expect anything else? (rhetorical question)

@hustlinowl_psn said in You let cheaters run rampant.:

@sunjah_psn said in You let cheaters run rampant.:

Use it as a baseball video game, and you'll enjoy it more. People whine saying they have to have multi-player, it is the only thing that matters.

Then, all they do is complain about cheaters.

Play baseball for baseball as a video game...use Franchise and I SWEAR to you, there will be no freeze glitches or "bunt cheese". Multiplayer sucks and is stupid. Single player Franchise would be beyond belief if these past 7 years had been spent improving it and the game itself instead of this idiotic multiplayer BS.

CPU/AI is incompetent and boring sorry

No reason to be sorry, but that is kind of what I mean...if they had spent the last 7 years working on this as a game, it wouldn't be nearly as weak or incompetent. These guys are good at making an excellent baseball game, but as soon as DD came in the game basically stopped improving. I can make a list of so many things that have been adjusted or taken out to appease the DD crowd, and it has done nothing but hurt the video game.

1st baseman covering 1st on a solid hit to right is one specifically. It was taken out of the game because of the whining the on-line crowd did about it, and the 1st baseman now ignores his responsibility and stands there. Thing is, this is a real thing that happens in real life. I've watched it happen in MLB games, and sean casey even got thrown out by a LF a few years ago. Carl Furillo used to do it a lot in the 50's.

Unfortunately, that is how it is now. They take out real events from this video game to appease the (usually) ridiculously whiny crowd of DD players. Bunt cheese, disconnects, etc., etc. I honestly liked this game much better before DD was invented.

Use it as a baseball video game, and you'll enjoy it more. People whine saying they have to have multi-player, it is the only thing that matters.

Then, all they do is complain about cheaters.

Play baseball for baseball as a video game...use Franchise and I SWEAR to you, there will be no freeze glitches or "bunt cheese". Multiplayer sucks and is stupid. Single player Franchise would be beyond belief if these past 7 years had been spent improving it and the game itself instead of this idiotic multiplayer BS.

buried alive...in only 4 days