Community Forum

@THE_Tomdawg69er said in Feierabend is patched:

@BlueLiner79 said in Feierabend is patched:

@Renz2003 said in Feierabend is patched:

@THE_Tomdawg69er said in Feierabend is patched:

@BlueLiner79 said in Feierabend is patched:

Hes no more cheese than Hal or Kluber. I used him yesterday and he still at sub 60 mph knuckle. Chew on that!

Okay, So, how is Hal cheese? Hal throws several pitches, none of which are sinkers or cutters, that are only good if you locate them.

Kluber is hittable at this point. He was hittable last year too.

The term “cheese” doesn’t apply to either of these guys because they are 99 and 98, which means you aren’t supposed to light them up every time you face them.

Feirabend is
-not even in the league because he’s trash
-throws a pitch that before he got patched was better than it ever should’ve been. He’s not in the league for a reason

a common. Try using a common pitcher without a knuckleball and it will be a bad time.

Keep your cheese, but calling pitchers who are high rated cheese is the most absurd thing I’ve ever heard

what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

It’s fine cheese but cheese none the less.

Hal has an unhittable curveball which is 25 mph less than his fastball. Cheese at its best. I enjoy using shitty pitchers to make other guys think they will smack them around. Its just how you mix it up. Also i have Steven Wright in my rotation. Again he is a common with an ok knuckleball but if you know where to place it it's hard to hit. Hope you got even dumber after this rebuttal.

Lmao, I’d love to play you since you think gals curve ball is untouchable

After the recent patch I have no problem hitting anyone. I've racked Kluber twice. "Hal is good against my left heavy lineup.

@BillsMafia863 said in BR is a mad house:

I haven’t played BR since they changed it so you can pick your starters. What’s your strategy. Go with common starters or do you use silvers on starts now?

Well I had diamond Morton and Gold Kluber in the rotation with a pen that maxed at a silver

Since it takes 3 games to refresh stamina, I would shift between starting Morton and Kluber, then every 3rd game, I'd start Eduardo Rodriguez

The goal I used is to base the relievers I used off of the level of starter I was using, meaning Morton would get my worst relievers while Kluber would get the mid ones and Rodriguez would get the best relievers on my team

The other thing I would do is, before games, look at my opponent's lineup and decide at which batter I'd take my starter out at, then how long I'd go with a specific reliever

There's no virus in baseball!!!

@JustASeal0 said in The gods have blessed me:

@joshjays44 said in The gods have blessed me:

Wow, thanking God for a natural occurrence, okay I'll play along.....the Gods have blessed me cause I got that green light that's always red when I get there....oh the Gods are looking down on me today :).

Hey! It's analog guy!

It is I, the analog guy!!!!...I'll be here all week, try the veal and tip your waitresses.

@mgsfan222 said in Early BR strategies thread:

The lineups is about far more than just tier. In 19, one of my best BR sluggers was breakout Eric Thames. I believe he is a 75 silver. Personally, I hit better with him than most diamonds. In fact, I have over a .500 average with him. Don’t get caught up solely on ratings, there are cards that play far above and far below their ratings for each user.

You're talking to someone who has a 2.200 ops with 76 Sogard

@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.

You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.

I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine

This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says

I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.

I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you

You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size.

@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@eatyum said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@JustASeal0 said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

@DELICATE_GEEBS said in Potential late game-breaking BR concept:

My man is just trying to get people to hit terribly to get some free BR wins.

You want to take RNG out of the equation then play at Shippett during the day and let the ball fly when you make good contact.

I've gone 12-0 3 times in my second year playing this game, I think I'll be fine

This is why I was reluctant to make this post because even though I asserted that it 1. Might not work for everyone and 2. Was not much more than a concept, some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says

I wasn't finding faults, is it not a legit question to ask the sample size? Is it wrong to question if the success can be sustained? I don't get why you'd be upset with those questions, I didn't say it's a terrible method or call you names, just wanting to know the research behind the idea. I don't think that's unreasonable.

I didn't even quote you in what you're responding to, I answered your question but if that wasn't good enough then please, what can I answer for you

You answered my question?
My question was what is the sample size?
You answered "that's why it's called a concept"
How is that answering my question? That doesn't tell me the sample size.

You said "I wonder if it's sustainable success", calm down just a little

I have played in only 8 games while working on it and right now I have experienced a slightly disappointing 6-2 so far

There is still optimism because I am seeing way too many hard hits on bad pci, including a game where I scored 12 in 2 innings that I had talked about in a previous independent post on the thread

I called it a concept because it is. I called it potentially game breaking because it is, in fact, potentially game breaking

There is now sample size and quality of play listed, I hope this works for you but if you have more questions I will answer because I want this to be a big project for me

I just don't understand why you got so defensive, I just asked some questions because I was curious, and I asked about sustainable success and sample size. Sure, you didn't quote me when saying "some of you are just obsessed with finding the issue in everything someone says", but we both know you were referring to me along with Delicates.

You're a cool dude and I've always like your forums posts, I was just asking some relevant questions to get a better understanding of the idea. It's an interesting idea and I look forward to hearing more about it, .

If you thought I had any other intention or if I somehow put a tone in those comments when I didn't mean it that way, I apologize.

I was planning on apologizing for coming off how I did when you posted again

I get really obsessive over these things, I don't want to make excuses, I'm sorry

@JustASeal0 said in I didn't think Kontrol Freeks were necessary, I've changed my mind:

I really didn't think they'd do much for me but now I'm squaring everything up, I hit a 538 foot homerun with Kike Hernandez against a righty

Try them out for hitting, I've used them for pitching for awhile but I feel like I've cheated myself for all this time by not using them

I've been preaching this for a minute. Especially those with "man" hands..

There are Cardinals that I would like to see added.
Remove Ankiel and give us a Chris Carpenter
Take away the Matt Carpenter SS card and Give us Rolen.

And throw in a 1985 Willie McGee MVP card and newly inducted Hall of Fame catcher Ted Simmons.

@DriveByTrucker17 said in Officially Baseball SZN:

@jjar1125z said in Officially Baseball SZN:

I guess the NBA/NHL doesn't count??

We run a strict baseball/football only household here son

ahmen ensues

I'd be happier if they'd simply allow me to separate vs. CPU stats from RS stats.

I can't tell you how many hours I've sunk into this thing in its entirety. I still have the bottom two moments left.

Was one hit short in that Yelich mission for about 40 times until I finally got it last night. Definitely the hardest one of the 5 I have completed so far. Although that Shawn Green mission was pretty nightmare-ish as well.

I'm pretty confident that no one has taken as many at bats vs. Anthony DeSclafani all year...

If you delete it you can always just go back and redownload it and your team is still on there. I deleted a dozen games to make room for all the space needed for ’19 and borderlands 2 and then I got an extended storage device and just downloaded all my old games including ’18 onto that, so far not one game has lost its spot in the game or given me any problems with doing so.