The more I think about it the more I want a Randy Johnson and Pedro Martinez card
JustASeal0
Posts
-
-
Of all the cards we could've gotten
-
@mitchhammond24 said in So I I have to admit something here:
@A_PerfectGame said in So I I have to admit something here:
@mitchhammond24 said in So I I have to admit something here:
Wanna play on legend tonight? Minor league stadium on legend?
Yea I’m down. But I’m gonna go to juijitsu class at 730 I’ll be on like 9-930 eastern time.
Sounds good to me. Who wants to see me mercy this guy within 4?
I don't have it in me to clown him anymore, if he takes the L like a man I don't have an issue with him
-
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
I didn’t believe his swing could be as amazing as everyone says it is, but then I picked up the 95 version.
I now see the light, and have realized what a naive fool I was.
I am a glad you have seen the light. I guess I am playing the wrong guys. I have gotten him out rather easy.
Yea the one time you've faced him in your last 30+ games you did well against him...
That's a pretty big sample size..
Not accurate but that is
You've faced him once in your last 45 games, I don't think a guy hitting in the .250s struggling to get out of wildcard should really be considered a sample size for you being able to get him out "rather easy" but if you think so then all the power to you. We all know you're willing to die on this hill because you can't comprehend the fact that you couldn't hit with him while the overwhelming majority of players that have him can..
The only people I've seen who didn't absolutely rake with Foxx are the people in all star purgatory and haven't gotten out since the game launched
-
@abbyspapa said in I didn't think Kontrol Freeks were necessary, I've changed my mind:
Which ones did you get?
They're called Galaxy
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@JustASeal0 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
I didn’t believe his swing could be as amazing as everyone says it is, but then I picked up the 95 version.
I now see the light, and have realized what a naive fool I was.
I am a glad you have seen the light. I guess I am playing the wrong guys. I have gotten him out rather easy.
Yea the one time you've faced him in your last 30+ games you did well against him...
That's a pretty big sample size..
Not accurate but that is
You've faced him once in your last 45 games, I don't think a guy hitting in the .250s struggling to get out of wildcard should really be considered a sample size for you being able to get him out "rather easy" but if you think so then all the power to you. We all know you're willing to die on this hill because you can't comprehend the fact that you couldn't hit with him while the overwhelming majority of players that have him can..
The only people I've seen who didn't absolutely rake with Foxx are the people in all star purgatory and haven't gotten out since the game launched
Well this in of itself is breaking news. So there ARE people who don't rake with him? Some people don't understand that such people exist. Maybe some truth to this. Ironically, when I got him I was in the end of WS. I actually was getting weak base hits. When the season restarted he was not hitting anything. I subsequently sold him.
btw...if anyone is questioning the accuracy of my statements...ask Skepple he will go back 220 games to see this is true.
You play a whole lot of games to not be able to hit with the second best swing in the game, that's pretty depressing ngl, I feel for you
-
@Malikeve said in I didn't think Kontrol Freeks were necessary, I've changed my mind:
nah its useless
I was going to say they've really helped me but because of this singular post I'll go against what many top players have said and agree with "nah its useless"
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@JustASeal0 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@JustASeal0 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
I didn’t believe his swing could be as amazing as everyone says it is, but then I picked up the 95 version.
I now see the light, and have realized what a naive fool I was.
I am a glad you have seen the light. I guess I am playing the wrong guys. I have gotten him out rather easy.
Yea the one time you've faced him in your last 30+ games you did well against him...
That's a pretty big sample size..
Not accurate but that is
You've faced him once in your last 45 games, I don't think a guy hitting in the .250s struggling to get out of wildcard should really be considered a sample size for you being able to get him out "rather easy" but if you think so then all the power to you. We all know you're willing to die on this hill because you can't comprehend the fact that you couldn't hit with him while the overwhelming majority of players that have him can..
The only people I've seen who didn't absolutely rake with Foxx are the people in all star purgatory and haven't gotten out since the game launched
Well this in of itself is breaking news. So there ARE people who don't rake with him? Some people don't understand that such people exist. Maybe some truth to this. Ironically, when I got him I was in the end of WS. I actually was getting weak base hits. When the season restarted he was not hitting anything. I subsequently sold him.
btw...if anyone is questioning the accuracy of my statements...ask Skepple he will go back 220 games to see this is true.
You play a whole lot of games to not be able to hit with the second best swing in the game, that's pretty depressing ngl, I feel for you
If not being able to hit with Foxx is something that would actually make YOU think someone would feel depressed. I feel more for you. Life is good even when Foxx aint hitting for me. This maybe a shock but there is a lot more to life than this game or this site. Maybe that is why I am not as good. I have other things going on. I hope you have other things going on.
This reply is just an extended version of "I know you are but what am I"
-
Maybe it is cheating now...
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
That's great.
Also, you requesting me to rephrase a mathematical formula is downright ridiculous.
It's like requesting me to rephrase a2+b2=c2...
Nope i am requesting nothing from you. I am done if you are done...
Btw that formula states that there is a specific and constant relationship that exists between the sides of a right triangle.
More importantly, this is based on proofs and theorems that exist objectively in geometry and algebra.WAR is NOT something that has the necessary underlying proof work or theorems that would make it valid. Trust me when I say that WAR has not gone under the level of scrutiny via proofs that Pythagorean’s theorem has. Wait did you just compare the Pythagorean theorem with sabermetrics.
Oh wait, I am sorry I went over your head.
Anyway. To answer your question..I request nothing. I have nothing left to add that you could comprehend
5000 IQ Redditor right here guys, just admit it, we're no match
-
-
@joshjays44 said in The gods have blessed me:
Wow, thanking God for a natural occurrence, okay I'll play along.....the Gods have blessed me cause I got that green light that's always red when I get there....oh the Gods are looking down on me today :).
Hey! It's analog guy!
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@JustASeal0 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
That's great.
Also, you requesting me to rephrase a mathematical formula is downright ridiculous.
It's like requesting me to rephrase a2+b2=c2...
Nope i am requesting nothing from you. I am done if you are done...
Btw that formula states that there is a specific and constant relationship that exists between the sides of a right triangle.
More importantly, this is based on proofs and theorems that exist objectively in geometry and algebra.WAR is NOT something that has the necessary underlying proof work or theorems that would make it valid. Trust me when I say that WAR has not gone under the level of scrutiny via proofs that Pythagorean’s theorem has. Wait did you just compare the Pythagorean theorem with sabermetrics.
Oh wait, I am sorry I went over your head.
Anyway. To answer your question..I request nothing. I have nothing left to add that you could comprehend
5000 IQ Redditor right here guys, just admit it, we're no match
Cool. I am going to wait for you to say something interesting or relevant.
You definitely did not wait
-
-
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@JustASeal0 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@JustASeal0 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
That's great.
Also, you requesting me to rephrase a mathematical formula is downright ridiculous.
It's like requesting me to rephrase a2+b2=c2...
Nope i am requesting nothing from you. I am done if you are done...
Btw that formula states that there is a specific and constant relationship that exists between the sides of a right triangle.
More importantly, this is based on proofs and theorems that exist objectively in geometry and algebra.WAR is NOT something that has the necessary underlying proof work or theorems that would make it valid. Trust me when I say that WAR has not gone under the level of scrutiny via proofs that Pythagorean’s theorem has. Wait did you just compare the Pythagorean theorem with sabermetrics.
Oh wait, I am sorry I went over your head.
Anyway. To answer your question..I request nothing. I have nothing left to add that you could comprehend
5000 IQ Redditor right here guys, just admit it, we're no match
Cool. I am going to wait for you to say something interesting or relevant.
You definitely did not wait
What am I suppose to do with this. You are failing at insulting me or proving me wrong. I think it’s because you don’t seem to have a point.why are you even bothering commenting. Is it because with all the bad posts you have made I am the only one who gives you attention. Do you just need a hug? I may know a bit about stats but you are beyond my ability comprehend.
I guess that my response was, in fact, interesting enough to respond to
Either that, or you don't understand what ignoring someone else is
You can do it! I believe in you
-
-
@TheHungryHole said in who is the SDS moderator on the twitch channel:
they keep deleting posts of mine saying literally 'who else is gaming all night" and a separate "bad one" saying - GO BRAVES
SDS what kind of censorship garbagio are you trying to promote on your twitch?
I said "good squared homer" and got suspended
-
This thread is just 6 pages of people arguing(yeah, yeah, I participated in said arguing and I feel bad about it) and not understanding that the other guy is just a troll, hell, he might not even know it.
But one last thing, Maverick, if you are reading this and you didn't, in fact, block me because you're too insecure, then I suggest you don't respond to this because if you do it'll show just how much you care about what other people on the internet think about your intelect. Keep your frustration to yourself and have a good rest of the day with all the time you'll save from not arguing and acting like you're better than everyone else on a forum. Trust me, not responding is doing yourself a favor
-
3 event games in now, I haven't gotten 1 lock on glitch
I'm either the luckiest man ever or it's fixed at least somewhat
-
@MrGamebred said in What's the strategy for BR in '20?:
I didn't really play BR in the beta, which I highly regret, but I'm curious what the new strategy will be for drafting with the new 3 batter minimum rule?
Bronzes in the rotation? Mix of bronze, silver, maybe a gold? Still a common rotation and loading up the lineup? A fair balanced team? What do you think?I did 2 runs, my second was a 12-1
Bronzes in the rotation, commons on the bench, silvers in the pen with maybe one gold
-
Reward path:
- Posey
The best catcher you'll see in this game for a while, better than Biggio
- Sandberg
Elite 2B, 5 tool player with a killer bat
- Reggie Jackson
Top tier bat and swing, fielding hurts him a little
- Larkin and Minoso
Not bad, just not as good as the others
High diamond:
- Kluber
Best starter in the game
- Fingers
Best reliever in the game
- Newhouser
Elite starter at this point, very usable with great stamina
- McCovey
Great pinch hitter vs righties
- Henderson
Probably your 3rd best bench bat against lefties, glorified pinch runner
Classic pack:
- Mondesi
Still elite SS card to this day
- Sanchez
Is a goon but easily replaced by Posey, still a very good bench bat
- Reyes
Semi useful starter early game for anyone, can be effective when utilized well
- Morton
Mop up arm / 6th starter, he's not good but he can eat innings
- Robles
This card isn't very good, he excels at nothing. Outclassed by Buxton, Acuña, Judge, and maybe even Kevin Kiermaier with his glitchy swing
-
In before Skepple
NEW LEGENDS in 2020
Andruw Jones is the Last SS
So I I have to admit something here
Jimmie Foxx is unjammable
I didn't think Kontrol Freeks were necessary, I've changed my mind
Jimmie Foxx is unjammable
I didn't think Kontrol Freeks were necessary, I've changed my mind
Jimmie Foxx is unjammable
I hope SDS addresses this issue...
Jimmie Foxx is unjammable
The gods have blessed me
Jimmie Foxx is unjammable
Fairwell, old friend
Jimmie Foxx is unjammable
who is the SDS moderator on the twitch channel
Jimmie Foxx is unjammable
1.09 Patch Discussion
What's the strategy for BR in '20?
Rank them
I am holding a press conference