@mike__honcho_361 said in Adley or Gary Carter?:
@jkooch66_xbl said in Adley or Gary Carter?:
@genopolanco_psn said in Adley or Gary Carter?:
Which one do you play better with?
I don't buy into that generally. The cards are going to play to their stats, modified by my performance, but that's equal across them all. I'm going to play better with the better card.
That being said, these cards are [censored] close. Carter has far better contact L, Power L & R, and elite vision. He also has a good bit more speed. But his contact R is seriously lacking, his defense is slightly worse, and Adley switch hits. I think if Adley didn't switch or Carter had like 85 contact R it would be a much easier decision.
I don’t agree with that line of thinking. You can have a card with amazing attributes that you just can’t hit with and vice versa. My best hitter this year so far is FOTF Devers and I have plenty of cards on my team with better attributes.
I really haven’t used Carter this year, but I’d choose the Adley card over him any day. Has a good swing and being a switch hitter makes him even more valuable.
I disagree. I'm not particularly great at the game but I've been playing since 08 and I've NEVER noticed some crappy player having a "great swing" or anything of the sort. Over time with enough at bats the cards will play to their attributes. It is different with different users. For example a card with very low vision could be unusable for a bad player and mash with someone who's very skilled with the PCI. But given the same user, cards will eventually play to their attributes.
And I think you're just underselling Devers. I got P5 with him a long time ago, well over 100 HRs. At P4 you're looking at 93 contact R and 110 power R, with plus vision. I'm not sure you have "plenty of cards" that are better than him. It really doesn't even get much better at all. Even if you had 125 contact and 125 power that could take some time to be clearly ahead of 93/110. It wouldn't be that absurd for Devers to outperform him over 50 or even 100 at bats or more. That wouldn't mean that 125 guy has a bad swing or Raffy had a great swing or that YOU personally are better or worse with one or the other, that's just how statistics work.