Community Forum

@prettyyboyfloyd_PSN There is an argument to be made that cheaper cards is better for (most) players. Great so my Bryan Woo diamond isn't worth 12k I have to sell him for 6k? Well the other cards are cheaper to so I dont' need that 12k.

It also makes sense to keep prices down to make buying stubs attractive, why the [censored] would I buy stubs if Cal Raleigh is like 300k? But if he's 100k and that's all I need left, it will take me just one purchase.

I myself don't purchase stubs or totally agree with this change, but keeping cards cheaper do benefit people. If i didn't invest, but it still existed, the cards get more expensive and I get left behind.

Maybe you would call those people lazy, not hard enough grinders or whatever, your call. It does benefit people though,

I agree, it's just instant poof, you are outbid by one. You could reduce it almost to the equaling the sell now price and it still happens.

@Joeflakes_XBL I'ma be honest, I am to lazy to do that, I just remember them saying it.

@Joeflakes_XBL They did mention that in the same stream

@Wink_Face_Bro_PSN Those views = money for them + can claim on their taxes. Why would they not do it if people watch?

@Paulyciv_PSN So never?

Nothing really to update until actual MLB season starts

Atleast for the high end streamers, they can claim it as expenses on their taxes + they make more money off debuting the expensive cards on youtube/twitch and all that.

Haven't attempted that one yet, but I enjoy Diamond Quest. I used to skip doing them, but since showdowns count towards stats on hitters, I use it to finish stat missions

@MarioMendoza935_XBL Aye, I guess I am

hmmmmmmmmmm

@allday9128_PSN
I think the important thing to note here is explaining "outperforming someone who is consistently putting in bad inputs.

In any one game, stuff happens, a bloop could determine it. Having a game where the "worse" players wins isn't proof that the above statement is false. People need to look at a larger sample size and the overall. If I picked 20 random citizens in New York City, would they be enough proof that everyone in New York is like them? Of course not.

There is a reason one of the people in this thread that is criticizing has a 5x flawless banner, because the game in the overall is rewarding him with wins more often because of his skill.

@beatlesnews_PSN No, Taylor was an 87 and I think Cortes was to

@Dolenz_PSN Idk how well you know the real life baseball card scene, but most Hall of fame players autos you can get much cheaper then whoever is the latest hot prospect. It's not just a mlbts thing. People love a mystery box in real life. The prospect could be anybody, he could even turn into Bryce Harper!

Low numbered Jasson Dominguez rookie autos are in the 1000s, you can get just about any player or hall of famer for cheaper then that outside of the Babe Ruths etc.

I logged on, thought [censored] that Joc looks fun, bought Joc, and logged off. That's about where I am rn

no they don't

@iBonafideScrub__PSN I believe 20's nickname was MLB The Lineout. I think it was the first game where lineouts really got peoples attention

I just think how ironic it is that these games are on a pedestal now for the community. Back then I could (and was) called a fanboy for liking those games. There was so much complaining about the games in that period.

I don't disagree either, MLB 20-22 is way better then 23-24, It's just so funny to me that people have now decided they liked those games when in the past everyone trashed it.

It's sort of like politics, (please don't take that as a red vs blue statement or take it out of context), people as a whole always get annoyed with who is in charge, and then when it changes they want the good ole days back even though during those days they hated it.

A really long convoluting way to say I find the new love for those games funny.

@BillsMafia17449 [censored] only took the lead in the 8th? You are a pretty bad cheater.

9 perfects and two total bases? Press x to doubt.