@allday9128_PSN
I think the important thing to note here is explaining "outperforming someone who is consistently putting in bad inputs.
In any one game, stuff happens, a bloop could determine it. Having a game where the "worse" players wins isn't proof that the above statement is false. People need to look at a larger sample size and the overall. If I picked 20 random citizens in New York City, would they be enough proof that everyone in New York is like them? Of course not.
There is a reason one of the people in this thread that is criticizing has a 5x flawless banner, because the game in the overall is rewarding him with wins more often because of his skill.