Probably asked a million times but figures to ask a million and one.
Hal or Ricky?
Current Situations:
SP: Kluber, Oswalt, Walter Johnson, Feller, Gibson/Reyes
OF: Snider, Carter, Yelich, Hunter(Late Innings)
1B(Dump off spot) Helton and Stargell
Thanks and stay safe
Rickey is exactly as you'd expect. Good not great, hits lefties well, righties not so much. Plays a really good CF though. I think Hal is the better choice if you're trying to compete at the higher levels. If you're just trying to have fun, Rickey is as fun as it gets.
In your situation I'd go Ricky. But I haven't used Hal yet this year, and he was pretty decent last year. So up to you... Are you confident in your SP's?
Thanks for the input. Walter Johnson is lights out. Kluber and Oswalt are their own worst enemies as everybody has seen them. Thats my thinking with Hal. 5th spot is usually my spot reliever. My bullpen is all diamond but still plays like bronzes.
Yelich has become more suspect on defense as of late
Rickys no doubt animation is worth it in itself! but seriously, I have both and cannot complain about either. Ricky hitting around .330 and tons of SB and plays an excellent CF and Hal has been an anchor, K's a lot but can be tough to control vs someone with good discipline.
@TooGood3434 said in Hal or Ricky?:
Thanks for the input. Walter Johnson is lights out. Kluber and Oswalt are their own worst enemies as everybody has seen them. Thats my thinking with Hal. 5th spot is usually my spot reliever. My bullpen is all diamond but still plays like bronzes.
Yelich has become more suspect on defense as of late
Hmmm.. well dont think you could go wrong either way than. I guess if it was me it would come down to who else I had in mind to fill the other spot left void. (Upcoming free cards in xp program, cheaper alternative cards on market, Team affinity's I was nearing completion of, or just a "glitchy" card I excelled with for time being.) Everyone in a different position depending on the individual. Really is up to your best judgement
