Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues
-
I bought this game every year since they were 989 Sports. Last year's "Seasons" and not being able to use your players when you wanted was enough for me. I quit playing about the end of August last year and that was the first time I never played through to the next game release. Sounds like this year's game is really bad. How does it compare to 18? That is generally considered the worst Show ever released.
-
@TEXAS10PT said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
I bought this game every year since they were 989 Sports. Last year's "Seasons" and not being able to use your players when you wanted was enough for me. I quit playing about the end of August last year and that was the first time I never played through to the next game release. Sounds like this year's game is really bad. How does it compare to 18? That is generally considered the worst Show ever released.
Despite the issues gameplay has, it’s still leaps and bounds better than 18 was
Content is mainly packs. Programs aren’t what they used to be.
-
@chucky97___ said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
Next Gen only is needed if we want any change, until then we're stuck with this.
If SDS actually came out and said "Hey MLBTS'ers - so, we need to sell a ton of packs this year to fund state-of-the-art servers, and a new engine for "next-gen" consoles", I probably could have gotten on board with that. I love transparency.
-
@MarioMendoza935 said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
I'm enjoying gameplay (in general), but disappointed in lack of "content"
That's the camp I am in also.
-
@MarioMendoza935 said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
@chucky97___ said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
Next Gen only is needed if we want any change, until then we're stuck with this.
If SDS actually came out and said "Hey MLBTS'ers - so, we need to sell a ton of packs this year to fund state-of-the-art servers, and a new engine for "next-gen" consoles", I probably could have gotten on board with that. I love transparency.
which is so obvious they are in the hole, they need more money, it's why we have the exact same legend pool. They spent the bag on Jeter's likeness.
-
@chucky97___ said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
They spent the bag
I'm only replying in .gif form for the rest of the week.
-
@chucky97___ hey man, you can't call me out for not provide solutions but all you have is chalking it up to "it's not next Gen." Thats not a solution. But I'm not trying to argue anymore. I think it's bigger than that. Even if it was next gen (which yes fair enough) that's just one piece. That doesn't solve a dang thing for today or the next day or the next. In fact I'd argue it wouldn't solve anything for another 2-5 years when the next console is out.
PC remains master race because of this argument cause you now have allowed me to make the argument that NO it's not next Gen, put it all on PC and bam! Perfection!Edit: sorry I said I was done arguing then argued again. To the void.
-
@MarioMendoza935 said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
@chucky97___ said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
They spent the bag
I'm only replying in .gif form for the rest of the week.
That's the average Show player purchasing a 50 pack thinking he'll get even ONE diamond, Chase pack included.
-
@MarioMendoza935 said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
@chucky97___ said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
Next Gen only is needed if we want any change, until then we're stuck with this.
If SDS actually came out and said "Hey MLBTS'ers - so, we need to sell a ton of packs this year to fund state-of-the-art servers, and a new engine for "next-gen" consoles", I probably could have gotten on board with that. I love transparency.
This.
I had a theory that ‘23 was more monetized than ‘22 because they spent big to get Jeter, McGwire, Sosa, and the NGL and needed to recover money. If they came out today and apologized for this year’s [censored] show and said, “we’re going hard on packs because we are developing an entire new game engine with new modes and legends for ‘25” I would buy a 20 bundle a week and consider it an investment in a much better game.
But there is zero communication so we are left to assume the worst.
-
@AdeptOfMemory its like mid next gen, they have the next gen ability yet they refuse to leave ps4 behind.
-
@SnakeEyes187 said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
@MarioMendoza935 said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
@chucky97___ said in Yet Another Game “Update” That Doesn’t Address Actual Issues:
Next Gen only is needed if we want any change, until then we're stuck with this.
If SDS actually came out and said "Hey MLBTS'ers - so, we need to sell a ton of packs this year to fund state-of-the-art servers, and a new engine for "next-gen" consoles", I probably could have gotten on board with that. I love transparency.
This.
I had a theory that ‘23 was more monetized than ‘22 because they spent big to get Jeter, McGwire, Sosa, and the NGL and needed to recover money. If they came out today and apologized for this year’s [censored] show and said, “we’re going hard on packs because we are developing an entire new game engine with new modes and legends for ‘25” I would buy a 20 bundle a week and consider it an investment in a much better game.
But there is zero communication so we are left to assume the worst.
Then I hope you don't play the stock market, lol...
-
The fact that they are not even acknowledging the community this year is wild to me. No streams and limited to no dev communication on the forums is so out of character.
-
A admin locked this topic on
