Should set cards have shorter parallel requirements?
-
It just seems with the new set expirations, you don't really get a lot of time to enjoy your P5 cards.
-
I think they should just get rid of sets. It’s another example of why these sets and seasons suck. Paralleling cards has been one of the best additions they’ve ever made to DD and this year they made it pretty pointless.
-
Clearly there needs to be a much lower parallel for a position player. Or make pitchers 20k.
-
The problem is not the parallel requirements. It is not sets/seasons. It also isn't that the best cards come in packs, programs take too much grinding, the best rewards are "no sell", captains are irrelevant, etc. The problem is that SDS implemented a ton of changes this year and left other things that have been present for years. Without planning how everything works together. Had one or two of these changes been implemented or detailed planning went into things, this all would not be as frustrating as it is. Unfortunately that has not been the case.
-
@genopolanco_PSN said in Should set cards have shorter parallel requirements?:
I think they should just get rid of sets. It’s another example of why these sets and seasons suck. Paralleling cards has been one of the best additions they’ve ever made to DD and this year they made it pretty pointless.
My reason I don’t mind sets is last year I would have 100 more than needed certain program cards and not enough of others
-
A admin locked this topic on
