Does anchoring the PCI extend reach out of the zone?

[DomeBay33_PSN]

I haven’t had too much time to play the Tech test. Just batting practice before servers were live and 2 early quit games last night so I didn’t notice.

I want to say it should keep the same PCI coverage circumference in tact, so you could reach a bit further out of the zone. Can anybody conifrm?

[Chuck_Dizzle29_PSN]

@domebay33_psn said in Does anchoring the PCI extend reach out of the zone?:

I haven’t had too much time to play the Tech test. Just batting practice before servers were live and 2 early quit games last night so I didn’t notice.

I want to say it should keep the same PCI coverage circumference in tact, so you could reach a bit further out of the zone. Can anybody conifrm?

No, it just changes the starting point of the PCI. It does feel abit awkward to go away from the anchor point if you move it from the center. For example starting up and in makes going down and away feel more touchy.

[DomeBay33_PSN]

Interesting. I know if you anchor low and away using RH batter vs a RHP and setup the PCI up and in, the range of the PCI is decreased and It wont go as far up and in. I have to play more to make note but if you are right It could be a reduction of PCI on both ends of the Strike Zone.

It also shouldn’t feel that awkward if the PCI range is unaffected. To me it feels like it stops short, which makes sense, but I kinda hope that shortness is compensated on the opposite end and extend a bit further out of the zone. Might lead to more hit variety better physics too.