prestiging players a review imo
-
@mrwonderful95 said in prestiging players a review imo:
@lord_blumpkin35 said in prestiging players a review imo:
as title, and in comparison to last year with the red diamond.
prestige benefits the offline play which is awesome, based on gameplay itself without a set requirement that caused a lot of boosting last year like 121 RBI with beillinger or whatever, and the ability to level up all players is awesome. however what is yall thought on prestiging?is +5 too much especially for the 99 overall players that have very high stats already or does it not matter once at +110 stats
I did like it more for the mid level and early game especially the team affinty (marte goes from 88->92). just bored and the game is about over so wanted to see what the final thoughts are of the few ppl left hereI love the parallel system this year. It was a very nice addition and a way to keep people invested in using different cards. I think parallel would be even better if they would chill out with half of the game cycle being all 99’s. Adding plus 5 to all of Jacob Degroms already ridiculous attributes for example, kinda ruined the game for me this year. Hitting just is not fun at all especially on ranked HOF
That is due to pin point pitching, not parallel. A few attribute points is almost meaningless.
-
@eatyum_psn said in prestiging players a review imo:
I love how it is and it gives me reason to use new players, I wouldn't change a single thing about it
I agree, it kept my lineup changing. Before, once the good cards came out, my lineup just stayed the same. There wasn’t any reason for me to put anyone other than Ty Cobb in CF and in the leadoff spot. Now I swap people out and it keeps things fresh.
I was first to prestige TN Eric Haase and LS Andrew Romine, which I’m proud of.
-
I would like them to add XP for defensive plays.
-
Maybe a parallel system with a +5 for diamonds, +10 golds, +15 silvers and +20 for commons?
-
A admin locked this topic on
