Terrible inning program choice balance sds
-
Chris Sale is nasty.
H/9 definitely matters. -
@no-online-play-_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
Welcome to DD where the rules are made up and the points don't matter.
Who cares most of the attributes dont really matter cause there are 97 cards that play better then some 99s
There are to many Cases of over analyzing attributes when it doesn't really matter at this point of the year
I think someone complained that he didn't have an Outlier Perk.
Never have I seen so many people dependent on attributes and perks of a card.
Attributes and perks mean don't mean anything if you know how to pitch/hit with the player.
It does matter bc no matter how good you pitch if I come close to the ball with my pci with even decent timing they’re is a much higher chance I hit a somewhat undeserved bomb just by slamming my pci all bc the h/9 are low
-
@hikes83_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
LOL I have nothing else to say really. That’s two people now. I’m speechless
Hot take everyone: If you know how to pitch, live series Marquez is a top 5 option along with 99 DeGrom and 99 Verlander
They’re logic is just hilarious. Like duh someone who knows how to pitch can do well with an inferior card but if you know how to pitch just as well with a superior card then you should be even more dominant. It’s arguing the point just to argue
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@no-online-play-_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
Welcome to DD where the rules are made up and the points don't matter.
Who cares most of the attributes dont really matter cause there are 97 cards that play better then some 99s
There are to many Cases of over analyzing attributes when it doesn't really matter at this point of the year
I think someone complained that he didn't have an Outlier Perk.
Never have I seen so many people dependent on attributes and perks of a card.
Attributes and perks mean don't mean anything if you know how to pitch/hit with the player.
It does matter bc no matter how good you pitch if I come close to the ball with my pci with even decent timing they’re is a much higher chance I hit a somewhat undeserved bomb just by slamming my pci all bc the h/9 are low
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@no-online-play-_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
Welcome to DD where the rules are made up and the points don't matter.
Who cares most of the attributes dont really matter cause there are 97 cards that play better then some 99s
There are to many Cases of over analyzing attributes when it doesn't really matter at this point of the year
I think someone complained that he didn't have an Outlier Perk.
Never have I seen so many people dependent on attributes and perks of a card.
Attributes and perks mean don't mean anything if you know how to pitch/hit with the player.
It does matter bc no matter how good you pitch if I come close to the ball with my pci with even decent timing they’re is a much higher chance I hit a somewhat deserved bomb just by slamming my pci all bc the h/9 are low
You’re acting like he has 80 H/9 or something. 100+ is still very good, especially with all the other factors involved with Sale.
-
@jogger171717_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@no-online-play-_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
Welcome to DD where the rules are made up and the points don't matter.
Who cares most of the attributes dont really matter cause there are 97 cards that play better then some 99s
There are to many Cases of over analyzing attributes when it doesn't really matter at this point of the year
I think someone complained that he didn't have an Outlier Perk.
Never have I seen so many people dependent on attributes and perks of a card.
Attributes and perks mean don't mean anything if you know how to pitch/hit with the player.
It does matter bc no matter how good you pitch if I come close to the ball with my pci with even decent timing they’re is a much higher chance I hit a somewhat deserved bomb just by slamming my pci all bc the h/9 are low
You’re acting like he has 80 H/9 or something. 100+ is still very good, especially with all the other factors involved with Sale.
It’s still solid with his pitch mix just not dominant
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@jogger171717_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@no-online-play-_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
Welcome to DD where the rules are made up and the points don't matter.
Who cares most of the attributes dont really matter cause there are 97 cards that play better then some 99s
There are to many Cases of over analyzing attributes when it doesn't really matter at this point of the year
I think someone complained that he didn't have an Outlier Perk.
Never have I seen so many people dependent on attributes and perks of a card.
Attributes and perks mean don't mean anything if you know how to pitch/hit with the player.
It does matter bc no matter how good you pitch if I come close to the ball with my pci with even decent timing they’re is a much higher chance I hit a somewhat deserved bomb just by slamming my pci all bc the h/9 are low
You’re acting like he has 80 H/9 or something. 100+ is still very good, especially with all the other factors involved with Sale.
It’s still solid with his pitch mix just not dominant
It’ll be dominant
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@hikes83_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
LOL I have nothing else to say really. That’s two people now. I’m speechless
Hot take everyone: If you know how to pitch, live series Marquez is a top 5 option along with 99 DeGrom and 99 Verlander
They’re logic is just hilarious. Like duh someone who knows how to pitch can do well with an inferior card but if you know how to pitch just as well with a superior card then you should be even more dominant. It’s arguing the point just to argue
No one is arguing anything, in fact your proving the point we were trying to make. If you know how to pitch/hit you can do well with the majority of the cards in the game. As for H/9 Sig Greinke has a low H/9 he’s 7-0 for me with a sub 2.00 era, you know why? Because H/9 only matters if your opponent can hit/come close to the ball. Meanwhile with 99 degrom and all his glorious stats you guys drool over, im 2-5 with an era of 4.75. Those [censored] /9’s are so OP, the Chris Sale card will be as dominant as no hitter Verlander, mark my words you will all be on here bitching about how OP he is in a couple weeks.
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
The new 99 Cole Hamels is way better than Sale, sds is drunk and doesn’t want to listen to the community with these h/9 attributes killing what should be the best pitching cards
I disagree with that. Sale has his funky motion and for the first time they gave him a sinker. He gon b dirty
-
@jeezy-e_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@hikes83_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
LOL I have nothing else to say really. That’s two people now. I’m speechless
Hot take everyone: If you know how to pitch, live series Marquez is a top 5 option along with 99 DeGrom and 99 Verlander
They’re logic is just hilarious. Like duh someone who knows how to pitch can do well with an inferior card but if you know how to pitch just as well with a superior card then you should be even more dominant. It’s arguing the point just to argue
No one is arguing anything, in fact your proving the point we were trying to make. If you know how to pitch/hit you can do well with the majority of the cards in the game. As for H/9 Sig Greinke has a low H/9 he’s 7-0 for me with a sub 2.00 era, you know why? Because H/9 only matters if your opponent can hit/come close to the ball. Meanwhile with 99 degrom and all his glorious stats you guys drool over, im 2-5 with an era of 4.75. Those [censored] /9’s are so OP, the Chris Sale card will be as dominant as no hitter Verlander, mark my words you will all be on here bitching about how OP he is in a couple weeks.
The content creators who are really good at the game almost all agree Sale won’t be a top pitching card but mkay
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@jeezy-e_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@hikes83_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
LOL I have nothing else to say really. That’s two people now. I’m speechless
Hot take everyone: If you know how to pitch, live series Marquez is a top 5 option along with 99 DeGrom and 99 Verlander
They’re logic is just hilarious. Like duh someone who knows how to pitch can do well with an inferior card but if you know how to pitch just as well with a superior card then you should be even more dominant. It’s arguing the point just to argue
No one is arguing anything, in fact your proving the point we were trying to make. If you know how to pitch/hit you can do well with the majority of the cards in the game. As for H/9 Sig Greinke has a low H/9 he’s 7-0 for me with a sub 2.00 era, you know why? Because H/9 only matters if your opponent can hit/come close to the ball. Meanwhile with 99 degrom and all his glorious stats you guys drool over, im 2-5 with an era of 4.75. Those [censored] /9’s are so OP, the Chris Sale card will be as dominant as no hitter Verlander, mark my words you will all be on here bitching about how OP he is in a couple weeks.
The content creators who are really good at the game almost all agree Sale won’t be a top pitching card but mkay
Like I said, he’s going to fool some bad players for sure. He’s like Hader. You either struggle or tee-off on them.
I’m licking my chops when I see Hader, Sale or Chapman. Wagner? Can’t hit a lick off him
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@jeezy-e_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@hikes83_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
LOL I have nothing else to say really. That’s two people now. I’m speechless
Hot take everyone: If you know how to pitch, live series Marquez is a top 5 option along with 99 DeGrom and 99 Verlander
They’re logic is just hilarious. Like duh someone who knows how to pitch can do well with an inferior card but if you know how to pitch just as well with a superior card then you should be even more dominant. It’s arguing the point just to argue
No one is arguing anything, in fact your proving the point we were trying to make. If you know how to pitch/hit you can do well with the majority of the cards in the game. As for H/9 Sig Greinke has a low H/9 he’s 7-0 for me with a sub 2.00 era, you know why? Because H/9 only matters if your opponent can hit/come close to the ball. Meanwhile with 99 degrom and all his glorious stats you guys drool over, im 2-5 with an era of 4.75. Those [censored] /9’s are so OP, the Chris Sale card will be as dominant as no hitter Verlander, mark my words you will all be on here bitching about how OP he is in a couple weeks.
The content creators who are really good at the game almost all agree Sale won’t be a top pitching card but mkay
Top content creators also almost exclusively play MLBTS and tee off of everyone anyway.
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@jeezy-e_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@hikes83_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
LOL I have nothing else to say really. That’s two people now. I’m speechless
Hot take everyone: If you know how to pitch, live series Marquez is a top 5 option along with 99 DeGrom and 99 Verlander
They’re logic is just hilarious. Like duh someone who knows how to pitch can do well with an inferior card but if you know how to pitch just as well with a superior card then you should be even more dominant. It’s arguing the point just to argue
No one is arguing anything, in fact your proving the point we were trying to make. If you know how to pitch/hit you can do well with the majority of the cards in the game. As for H/9 Sig Greinke has a low H/9 he’s 7-0 for me with a sub 2.00 era, you know why? Because H/9 only matters if your opponent can hit/come close to the ball. Meanwhile with 99 degrom and all his glorious stats you guys drool over, im 2-5 with an era of 4.75. Those [censored] /9’s are so OP, the Chris Sale card will be as dominant as no hitter Verlander, mark my words you will all be on here bitching about how OP he is in a couple weeks.
The content creators who are really good at the game almost all agree Sale won’t be a top pitching card but mkay
Well now that someone on the internet said hes not going to be good i guess ill change my opinion …
-
@shawnzinator13 said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
@knoxwurst31_psn said in Terrible inning program choice balance sds:
I'm taking Sale.
And I’ll light him up if I face him
Yep you’ll light him up with your .266 batting average in online play. Another case of someone who thinks they’re better than they really are.
-
A admin locked this topic on
