Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?
-
Andrew Miller is the one I found so far. Maybe some of the 97 guys?
-
Dibble #1 for me
-
@ministro787-_mlbts said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Dibble #1 for me
Are you saying Dibble hits 99? All the way from 95?
-
Andrew Miller
Aroldis Chapman (signature)
Trevor Hoffman
Denis EckersleyI believe these would also work seeing they start at 97 overall
Monthly Awards Devin Williams
Milestone Edwin Diaz
All star Kimbral
All star Hader
And Tops Now Garrett Richards -
Eckersley and Hoffman reach 99. Chapman does not.
-
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Eckersley and Hoffman reach 99. Chapman does not.
I have Chapman at 97 and he's only parallel 2 does he really not get to 99?
-
@samguenther1987 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Eckersley and Hoffman reach 99. Chapman does not.
I have Chapman at 97 and he's only parallel 2 does he really not get to 99?
Currently I have him at parallel 4 and his rating is still at 97. He will be parallel 5 soon but he isnt gonna jump from 97 to 99.
-
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@samguenther1987 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Eckersley and Hoffman reach 99. Chapman does not.
I have Chapman at 97 and he's only parallel 2 does he really not get to 99?
Currently I have him at parallel 4 and his rating is still at 97. He will be parallel 5 soon but he isnt gonna jump from 97 to 99.
Ok fair enough, sorry
-
@samguenther1987 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@samguenther1987 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Eckersley and Hoffman reach 99. Chapman does not.
I have Chapman at 97 and he's only parallel 2 does he really not get to 99?
Currently I have him at parallel 4 and his rating is still at 97. He will be parallel 5 soon but he isnt gonna jump from 97 to 99.
Ok fair enough, sorry
I assumed he would also. I guess people want 99 teams is that why they want 99 overall players?
I mean he has 125 H/9 and 125 k/9.
-
I hit parallel V with Lee Smith.
-
@codywolfgang_xbl said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@samguenther1987 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@samguenther1987 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Eckersley and Hoffman reach 99. Chapman does not.
I have Chapman at 97 and he's only parallel 2 does he really not get to 99?
Currently I have him at parallel 4 and his rating is still at 97. He will be parallel 5 soon but he isnt gonna jump from 97 to 99.
Ok fair enough, sorry
I assumed he would also. I guess people want 99 teams is that why they want 99 overall players?
I mean he has 125 H/9 and 125 k/9.
Stamina sinks relievers.
I've got All Star Wagner at PIV, and he's a 93.
-
@jnavarro25_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Andrew Miller is the one I found so far. Maybe some of the 97 guys?
Who cares? It’s just a number.
-
@samguenther1987 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@samguenther1987 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@omegaeod_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Eckersley and Hoffman reach 99. Chapman does not.
I have Chapman at 97 and he's only parallel 2 does he really not get to 99?
Currently I have him at parallel 4 and his rating is still at 97. He will be parallel 5 soon but he isnt gonna jump from 97 to 99.
Ok fair enough, sorry
Just got Chapman to Parallel 5. Here is the link for stats and overall rating.
https://twitter.com/omegaeod_mut/status/1442318755959242757?s=21
-
I think there will be very few that will make it to 99 even with P5 because of how low the stamina is on RPs and CPs.
-
When I made this post I almost included a statement asking how long it would take for some guy to show up and not answer the question but instead say something about how 99 doesn't matter. I decided not to start a thread where I'm asking for help with anything ugly. He did show up though, and I'm LMAO right now. Certain topics always bring out THAT guy. You could set your watch by it. Anyway, thanks to all who helped on this thread. Much appreciated!
-
@mrad2010_mlbts said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
I hit parallel V with Lee Smith.
I have found Lee Smith to be very good as of late. Didn’t use him as much before, so I don’t have him paralleled very high yet.
-
I have Chapman and can’t see any reason to put effort to parallel him. Just let it come naturally as what really do you gain with his stats already that you absolutely would want? His pitching stats alone make him a 99 imo.
I look for players to parallel that would propel them to the next tier. Like if a am two points from going from a gold shield to a diamond shield to get better animations. Otherwise I really don’t see the bother if my guy is going to go from 81 to 86 vision.
-
@oachs83_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
I have Chapman and can’t see any reason to put effort to parallel him. Just let it come naturally as what really do you gain with his stats already that you absolutely would want? His pitching stats alone make him a 99 imo.
I look for players to parallel that would propel them to the next tier. Like if a am two points from going from a gold shield to a diamond shield to get better animations. Otherwise I really don’t see the bother if my guy is going to go from 81 to 86 vision.
This is exactly how I feel about it. The only times I really try to parallel a hitter is if it’ll make his contact/power hit 100 or 125, if his fielding goes to the next shield, or if it’ll allow him to still keep his current shield at a secondary.
-
Mariano?
-
@bob_loblaw1984 said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
@jnavarro25_psn said in Has anyone founds relievers who parallel to 99 overall?:
Andrew Miller is the one I found so far. Maybe some of the 97 guys?
Who cares? It’s just a number.
You care, you replied. Contribute or gtfo
