Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs
-
@dcmo3_psn said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
@tylerslikewhoa_xbl said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
Their shouldn't be a cap. Commons should be wroth based of demand. Let the market decide the price
That's the way it should be. Unfortunately, some were taking advantage of no cap, and transferring stubs. All it takes is a few, to ruin it for the rest of us.
^ This right here. People were abusing it for stub transfers to move millions of stubs from one account to another. Now and then I would be a lucky person that was there when one was happening and someone would be buying up all the orders where I would make a killing on garbage cards.
-
I have to admit that I am starting to be baffled on this one. It has been two weeks since he was added to the game and the buy orders are still above 13,000
Assuming that the card has been selling at a reasonable pace that means that probably 30,000 or more players need him for the collection. Did that many people really all decide to finish the Angels collection at the same time this late into the year?
-
@dolenz_psn said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
I have to admit that I am starting to be baffled on this one. It has been two weeks since he was added to the game and the buy orders are still above 13,000
Assuming that the card has been selling at a reasonable pace that means that probably 30,000 or more players need him for the collection. Did that many people really all decide to finish the Angels collection at the same time this late into the year?
With Trout dropping below 100 k yes. surprising its not double that.
-
A admin locked this topic on
