Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses
-
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
Look at those stats. Power vs L is the lowest hitting attribute. Its George Brett
-
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
-
@da-kak-wagon_mlbts said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
Yeah, I'm almost positive it's George Brett. Of all the 10+ All Star guys who have been an MVP and on the same team, I think he's the only one that fits the ratings profile and doesn't already have a high rewards card.
-
Could Matt kemp be the “his first 99”
-
My guess for the second boss is George Brett.
-
@sullysull08_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Could Matt kemp be the “his first 99”
Yeah it's him which means the pitcher won't be Pedro.
To fit the theme of this inning, what pitcher should have been released earlier and will seem kinda meh at this point?
-
@da-kak-wagon_mlbts said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
I'll move Chipper somewhere else to roll with a 99 George Brett (LF perhaps?). His card always hits so well.
-
@skarmaen_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@sullysull08_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Could Matt kemp be the “his first 99”
Yeah it's him which means the pitcher won't be Pedro.
To fit the theme of this inning, what pitcher should have been released earlier and will seem kinda meh at this point?
Don Sutton
-
@taco_truck_face said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@da-kak-wagon_mlbts said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
I'll move Chipper somewhere else to roll with a 99 George Brett (LF perhaps?). His card always hits so well.
Agree - love Brett but problem is they had us thinking this would be an epic set of bosses and so now its a letdown. Nothing against Brett & Kemp but they're not Babe & Mickey....
-
@rosborn27_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@taco_truck_face said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@da-kak-wagon_mlbts said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
I'll move Chipper somewhere else to roll with a 99 George Brett (LF perhaps?). His card always hits so well.
Agree - love Brett but problem is they had us thinking this would be an epic set of bosses and so now its a letdown. Nothing against Brett & Kemp but they're not Babe & Mickey....
I agree on this front, too. The pitcher has to be a real good one for me to remember this inning as anything above average.
-
@taco_truck_face said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@da-kak-wagon_mlbts said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
I'll move Chipper somewhere else to roll with a 99 George Brett (LF perhaps?). His card always hits so well.
yeah im thinking he should have 1B, OF secondaries
-
@skarmaen_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@sullysull08_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Could Matt kemp be the “his first 99”
Yeah it's him which means the pitcher won't be Pedro.
To fit the theme of this inning, what pitcher should have been released earlier and will seem kinda meh at this point?
John Smoltz!
-
Love Kemp!!! He has such a quick swing!!
-
@sullysull08_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Could Matt kemp be the “his first 99”
Yea Kemp is boss #1
-
@rosborn27_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@taco_truck_face said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@da-kak-wagon_mlbts said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
I'll move Chipper somewhere else to roll with a 99 George Brett (LF perhaps?). His card always hits so well.
Agree - love Brett but problem is they had us thinking this would be an epic set of bosses and so now its a letdown. Nothing against Brett & Kemp but they're not Babe & Mickey....
I disagree, these are epic. Cards no one would have predicted. Something new for us to try out and have fun with. Giving us more variety to play with this year instead of everyone having the exact same legends in their lineup. I love how they mixed it up and that makes it epic.
-
@baracesilk_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@rosborn27_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@taco_truck_face said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@da-kak-wagon_mlbts said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
I'll move Chipper somewhere else to roll with a 99 George Brett (LF perhaps?). His card always hits so well.
Agree - love Brett but problem is they had us thinking this would be an epic set of bosses and so now its a letdown. Nothing against Brett & Kemp but they're not Babe & Mickey....
I disagree, these are epic. Cards no one would have predicted. Something new for us to try out and have fun with. Giving us more variety to play with this year instead of everyone having the exact same legends in their lineup. I love how they mixed it up and that makes it epic.
I agree. If people just want a lineup of Babe, Foxx, Tatis, Chipper, Mantle, Mays, Griffey, and Tatis why not just play a previous version of the game? I know for Xbox players that isn't possible but the people I see complain the most about content drops being disappointing are the ones that have used the same meta lineup for 5 years. I just don't see the fun in that at all
-
@the_dragon1912 said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@baracesilk_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@rosborn27_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@taco_truck_face said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@da-kak-wagon_mlbts said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
@raider52morrison said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Mantle or Ripken for the 2nd boss? Hints already out on twitter.
I think its George Brett
I'll move Chipper somewhere else to roll with a 99 George Brett (LF perhaps?). His card always hits so well.
Agree - love Brett but problem is they had us thinking this would be an epic set of bosses and so now its a letdown. Nothing against Brett & Kemp but they're not Babe & Mickey....
I disagree, these are epic. Cards no one would have predicted. Something new for us to try out and have fun with. Giving us more variety to play with this year instead of everyone having the exact same legends in their lineup. I love how they mixed it up and that makes it epic.
I agree. If people just want a lineup of Babe, Foxx, Tatis, Chipper, Mantle, Mays, Griffey, and Tatis why not just play a previous version of the game? I know for Xbox players that isn't possible but the people I see complain the most about content drops being disappointing are the ones that have used the same meta lineup for 5 years. I just don't see the fun in that at all
Kemp was the reward for Conquest Extreme. He had a high diamond last year. I dont know about 19, as I never played it, but anyway, it's the same guy, just boosted a little more. How is that diverse? How is having a +5 overall card more fun? I dont get this argument. It seems like some people would be happier playing with a 95-99 boosted Jed Lowrie for some walkoff base hit, than actual real life all time greats. All for the sake of "diversity".
-
Yes because some of us want.......diversity.
-
@baracesilk_psn said in Well It's Matt Kemp guys one of our inning bosses:
Yes because some of us want.......diversity.
Kemp had a 97 overall prime card last year. This one will be a little bit better. That's it.
-
Which gives us the option to maybe have a new person in our lineup. 97 prime card wasn't good enough to make most peoples final lineup. This one might be. It's nice to have more options to potentially make our team.
