125 max attributes might be gone
-
Dude if ratings only went up to 99 all cards would feel so similar lol . Are u crazy ??
-
@high-heat-27_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
Dude if ratings only went up to 99 all cards would feel so similar lol . Are u crazy ??
No, I can confidently say I am not.
-
People say that having the 99s exclusive to top tier is a good thing but it really isn't. In 20, you had so many great cards to choose from to play with, you could field so many different lineups and not get bored and still see some variation of line ups vs you.
I really don't get the hang up on certain players shouldn't have certain cards. Who cares? It's a fantasy mode with fantasy type players and cards and teams. The more the merrier. This game last year got me knowing who some players are and seeing them play this year I get an idea of who they are. I'm a casual baseball watcher though I love the game. Lost track of who is around on teams because of family and time but all these rookies make me a little more interested in seeing them play.
-
@raesone_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@arvcpa_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@raesone_psn said in [125 max attributes might be
So long story short, the idea was good but the actual implementation does nothing. So why not get rid of it. Everyone is still using the same cards like Trout, Mantle, Griffey, Tatis, Gehrig or whatever. Now they just have 125 instead of 99 attributes, wooptidoo.To me, this Spinal Tap skit sums it up...
-
@raider52morrison said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
They need to stop with giving everyone 99's. 99's should only be for GOATS sort of like immortals in 18. They need to cap LS plays like at 93 and rest of the big names should be anywhere from 94-98. No way should future starts be anywhere near Trout's level. They need to be cap @ like 85. Same thing with Topp now cards. Just because you had 1 [censored] good game doesn't mean you deserve a 95+ card. Doing this would make 99's rare.
This is exactly what happened in 18 and everyone hated that game.
-
@halfbutt_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@raesone_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@arvcpa_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@raesone_psn said in [125 max attributes might be
So long story short, the idea was good but the actual implementation does nothing. So why not get rid of it. Everyone is still using the same cards like Trout, Mantle, Griffey, Tatis, Gehrig or whatever. Now they just have 125 instead of 99 attributes, wooptidoo.To me, this Spinal Tap skit sums it up...
I have never seen a more accurate analogy in my life, my sincerest thanks for sharing kind sir.
-
@rabid55wolverine said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
People say that having the 99s exclusive to top tier is a good thing but it really isn't. In 20, you had so many great cards to choose from to play with, you could field so many different lineups and not get bored and still see some variation of line ups vs you.
I really don't get the hang up on certain players shouldn't have certain cards. Who cares? It's a fantasy mode with fantasy type players and cards and teams. The more the merrier. This game last year got me knowing who some players are and seeing them play this year I get an idea of who they are. I'm a casual baseball watcher though I love the game. Lost track of who is around on teams because of family and time but all these rookies make me a little more interested in seeing them play.
Hell, why not just make them all 99s.
The problem I have with these overblown cards, is they've done nothing to deserve it. They're never even going to sniff the hof, but they have as good or better cards than people who actually had the talent to make it. It's pretty messed up when you have a pitcher (Ohtani) with better power numbers against right-handers than the Babe, and that's just one example.
-
@halfbutt_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@raesone_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@arvcpa_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@raesone_psn said in [125 max attributes might be
So long story short, the idea was good but the actual implementation does nothing. So why not get rid of it. Everyone is still using the same cards like Trout, Mantle, Griffey, Tatis, Gehrig or whatever. Now they just have 125 instead of 99 attributes, wooptidoo.To me, this Spinal Tap skit sums it up...
Why don't you make 99 the best?
Ummm... These go to 125.
-
@raesone_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@halfbutt_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@raesone_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@arvcpa_psn said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
@raesone_psn said in [125 max attributes might be
So long story short, the idea was good but the actual implementation does nothing. So why not get rid of it. Everyone is still using the same cards like Trout, Mantle, Griffey, Tatis, Gehrig or whatever. Now they just have 125 instead of 99 attributes, wooptidoo.To me, this Spinal Tap skit sums it up...
I have never seen a more accurate analogy in my life, my sincerest thanks for sharing kind sir.
Anytime, my friend. Nigel Tufnel does offer deep insights!
-
@raider52morrison said in 125 max attributes might be gone:
They need to stop with giving everyone 99's. 99's should only be for GOATS sort of like immortals in 18. They need to cap LS plays like at 93 and rest of the big names should be anywhere from 94-98. No way should future starts be anywhere near Trout's level. They need to be cap @ like 85. Same thing with Topp now cards. Just because you had 1 [censored] good game doesn't mean you deserve a 95+ card. Doing this would make 99's rare.
I agree that the rating system is all out of wack. The future card thing is stupid IMO. There shouldn’t be so many 99s. The live series players were not represented very well last year. Most legends were overrated drastically. How do you rate Kenny Loften a 98 and then rank Mike Trout a 93? Just because they are retired doesn’t mean you should automatically inflate their ratings.
-
A admin locked this topic on
