Questions still not answered
-
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
"You just press the pitch button and it’s accuracy depends on the player ratings"
"If the game was truly a sim game you just wouldn’t be able to play above a cards capabilities like you can now."
"I get what you are saying, but I don’t think you should be able to over perform with a player. Under perform, yes, but for someone to be able to bat .400 with a average mlb player is ridiculous. Some people can do that with any player in the game and I personally think it’s too far out there for my liking. Too arcade like."
"All I ever said I wanted was the players to be represented accurately."
" if you have good at bats with said player, then you should be in the neighborhood of said players real life achievements. This cannot be done with zone hitting because a user that is really good at pci placement, can over achieve with any player in the game"
"you have to remember it’s not you hitting a baseball, your controlling a player hitting a baseball."
"We think the players should matter more than user input. "
Like I said, go download OOTP that's the answer.
I would agree except gor the statement controlling the player. Thereby OOTP does not answer the question.
The answer is to the poster is SOL, because once you take control of the player, your skill is going to influence the outcome one way or the other.
So the only way to get what he wants is to play OOTP because no game is going to be like the OP is wanting, that literally can not exist. So download OOTP to get the closest thing to it.
But that isn't what he wants. You are offering an incomplete substitute. And you did so without acknowledging that it is incomplete.
He wants something that can't exist, the closest thing to is OOTP, I don't care if he wants to use directional or classic, whatever there but the game he wants where you can't outperform a players real life counterpart can't exist. So, download OOTP and be on your way.
And you still do not see how your comments are inflammatory?
The truth can be inflammatory sometimes
-
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
"You just press the pitch button and it’s accuracy depends on the player ratings"
"If the game was truly a sim game you just wouldn’t be able to play above a cards capabilities like you can now."
"I get what you are saying, but I don’t think you should be able to over perform with a player. Under perform, yes, but for someone to be able to bat .400 with a average mlb player is ridiculous. Some people can do that with any player in the game and I personally think it’s too far out there for my liking. Too arcade like."
"All I ever said I wanted was the players to be represented accurately."
" if you have good at bats with said player, then you should be in the neighborhood of said players real life achievements. This cannot be done with zone hitting because a user that is really good at pci placement, can over achieve with any player in the game"
"you have to remember it’s not you hitting a baseball, your controlling a player hitting a baseball."
"We think the players should matter more than user input. "
Like I said, go download OOTP that's the answer.
I would agree except gor the statement controlling the player. Thereby OOTP does not answer the question.
The answer is to the poster is SOL, because once you take control of the player, your skill is going to influence the outcome one way or the other.
So the only way to get what he wants is to play OOTP because no game is going to be like the OP is wanting, that literally can not exist. So download OOTP to get the closest thing to it.
But that isn't what he wants. You are offering an incomplete substitute. And you did so without acknowledging that it is incomplete.
He wants something that can't exist, the closest thing to is OOTP, I don't care if he wants to use directional or classic, whatever there but the game he wants where you can't outperform a players real life counterpart can't exist. So, download OOTP and be on your way.
And you still do not see how your comments are inflammatory?
The truth can be inflammatory sometimes
If you say it in such a way, you are correct.
-
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
"You just press the pitch button and it’s accuracy depends on the player ratings"
"If the game was truly a sim game you just wouldn’t be able to play above a cards capabilities like you can now."
"I get what you are saying, but I don’t think you should be able to over perform with a player. Under perform, yes, but for someone to be able to bat .400 with a average mlb player is ridiculous. Some people can do that with any player in the game and I personally think it’s too far out there for my liking. Too arcade like."
"All I ever said I wanted was the players to be represented accurately."
" if you have good at bats with said player, then you should be in the neighborhood of said players real life achievements. This cannot be done with zone hitting because a user that is really good at pci placement, can over achieve with any player in the game"
"you have to remember it’s not you hitting a baseball, your controlling a player hitting a baseball."
"We think the players should matter more than user input. "
Like I said, go download OOTP that's the answer.
I would agree except gor the statement controlling the player. Thereby OOTP does not answer the question.
The answer is to the poster is SOL, because once you take control of the player, your skill is going to influence the outcome one way or the other.
So the only way to get what he wants is to play OOTP because no game is going to be like the OP is wanting, that literally can not exist. So download OOTP to get the closest thing to it.
But that isn't what he wants. You are offering an incomplete substitute. And you did so without acknowledging that it is incomplete.
He wants something that can't exist, the closest thing to is OOTP, I don't care if he wants to use directional or classic, whatever there but the game he wants where you can't outperform a players real life counterpart can't exist. So, download OOTP and be on your way.
And you still do not see how your comments are inflammatory?
The truth can be inflammatory sometimes
If you say it in such a way, you are correct.
Some people don't want to hear the truth, that's their cross to bear not mine
-
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
"You just press the pitch button and it’s accuracy depends on the player ratings"
"If the game was truly a sim game you just wouldn’t be able to play above a cards capabilities like you can now."
"I get what you are saying, but I don’t think you should be able to over perform with a player. Under perform, yes, but for someone to be able to bat .400 with a average mlb player is ridiculous. Some people can do that with any player in the game and I personally think it’s too far out there for my liking. Too arcade like."
"All I ever said I wanted was the players to be represented accurately."
" if you have good at bats with said player, then you should be in the neighborhood of said players real life achievements. This cannot be done with zone hitting because a user that is really good at pci placement, can over achieve with any player in the game"
"you have to remember it’s not you hitting a baseball, your controlling a player hitting a baseball."
"We think the players should matter more than user input. "
Like I said, go download OOTP that's the answer.
I would agree except gor the statement controlling the player. Thereby OOTP does not answer the question.
The answer is to the poster is SOL, because once you take control of the player, your skill is going to influence the outcome one way or the other.
So the only way to get what he wants is to play OOTP because no game is going to be like the OP is wanting, that literally can not exist. So download OOTP to get the closest thing to it.
But that isn't what he wants. You are offering an incomplete substitute. And you did so without acknowledging that it is incomplete.
He wants something that can't exist, the closest thing to is OOTP, I don't care if he wants to use directional or classic, whatever there but the game he wants where you can't outperform a players real life counterpart can't exist. So, download OOTP and be on your way.
And you still do not see how your comments are inflammatory?
The truth can be inflammatory sometimes
If you say it in such a way, you are correct.
Some people don't want to hear the truth, that's their cross to bear not mine
I agree, but there are nicer ways to tell people the truth.
-
Quick Question? What about folks with disibilities like muscular dystrophy or something that effects reaction should those folks be excluded from making it fair to compete?
-
@sean_87__psn said in Questions still not answered:
@itsfroggybaby said in Questions still not answered:
@sean_87__psn said in Questions still not answered:
@gradekthebard said in Questions still not answered:
I took it as implied since they have been given the opportunity to say if any input options weren't available and have every time answered that the one in question was. Yes, it would be nice to have a little more specificity, but the implication has been that all options are still in the game.
What I never understood is why it would matter, since all of the options you are asking about are not very competitive in h2h play and anyone using them is playing at a disadvantage.
I believe I answered you on this before. It’s the way I like to play. I don’t care if I’m at a disadvantage. I don’t like seeing all that junk on the screen. For me personally, it takes away from the game. Yes, I know I’m different, but I like to play games that are more grounded to reality. I don’t like games like call of duty. I like arma, squad, the old socom games, the old ghost recon games. It’s too bad they don’t make mil-sim shooters for the consoles anymore. It’s all fake arcade type stuff. That’s the reason I don’t like playing with the same settings as you or I’m guessing the majority of people on this form.
Modern warefare is very very accurate, and the only call of duty game I’ve enjoyed in a very long time. They changed a lot of names for copyright reasons but in the campaign that’s Afghanistan idc what they say, it’s pretty accurate as far as I can remember from my days in the desert.
The mechanics of the game are not accurate at all. What you talking bout Willis. You got people running 4.4 40s with 150 lbs of gear. Jumping off roof tops with that gear and not breaking their legs. The locations that they are depicting may be fairly accurate, but the gameplay is bananas.
I’m not talking about online play I’m talking about the campaigns. Although the ending isn’t very probable. But the gun mechanics and the tactics are very accurate. Nobody actually runs in their full battle gear, unless you’re in airborne, or air assault and even then it’s the airborne shuffle. The gameplay in the campaigns minus a few things is 98% on the head
-
@itsfroggybaby said in Questions still not answered:
@sean_87__psn said in Questions still not answered:
@itsfroggybaby said in Questions still not answered:
@sean_87__psn said in Questions still not answered:
@gradekthebard said in Questions still not answered:
I took it as implied since they have been given the opportunity to say if any input options weren't available and have every time answered that the one in question was. Yes, it would be nice to have a little more specificity, but the implication has been that all options are still in the game.
What I never understood is why it would matter, since all of the options you are asking about are not very competitive in h2h play and anyone using them is playing at a disadvantage.
I believe I answered you on this before. It’s the way I like to play. I don’t care if I’m at a disadvantage. I don’t like seeing all that junk on the screen. For me personally, it takes away from the game. Yes, I know I’m different, but I like to play games that are more grounded to reality. I don’t like games like call of duty. I like arma, squad, the old socom games, the old ghost recon games. It’s too bad they don’t make mil-sim shooters for the consoles anymore. It’s all fake arcade type stuff. That’s the reason I don’t like playing with the same settings as you or I’m guessing the majority of people on this form.
Modern warefare is very very accurate, and the only call of duty game I’ve enjoyed in a very long time. They changed a lot of names for copyright reasons but in the campaign that’s Afghanistan idc what they say, it’s pretty accurate as far as I can remember from my days in the desert.
The mechanics of the game are not accurate at all. What you talking bout Willis. You got people running 4.4 40s with 150 lbs of gear. Jumping off roof tops with that gear and not breaking their legs. The locations that they are depicting may be fairly accurate, but the gameplay is bananas.
I’m not talking about online play I’m talking about the campaigns. Although the ending isn’t very probable. But the gun mechanics and the tactics are very accurate. Nobody actually runs in their full battle gear, unless you’re in airborne, or air assault and even then it’s the airborne shuffle. The gameplay in the campaigns minus a few things is 98% on the head
I never played campaign, but if you like games more grounded to reality you should try squad or arma.
-
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@nflman2033 said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
"You just press the pitch button and it’s accuracy depends on the player ratings"
"If the game was truly a sim game you just wouldn’t be able to play above a cards capabilities like you can now."
"I get what you are saying, but I don’t think you should be able to over perform with a player. Under perform, yes, but for someone to be able to bat .400 with a average mlb player is ridiculous. Some people can do that with any player in the game and I personally think it’s too far out there for my liking. Too arcade like."
"All I ever said I wanted was the players to be represented accurately."
" if you have good at bats with said player, then you should be in the neighborhood of said players real life achievements. This cannot be done with zone hitting because a user that is really good at pci placement, can over achieve with any player in the game"
"you have to remember it’s not you hitting a baseball, your controlling a player hitting a baseball."
"We think the players should matter more than user input. "
Like I said, go download OOTP that's the answer.
I would agree except gor the statement controlling the player. Thereby OOTP does not answer the question.
The answer is to the poster is SOL, because once you take control of the player, your skill is going to influence the outcome one way or the other.
So the only way to get what he wants is to play OOTP because no game is going to be like the OP is wanting, that literally can not exist. So download OOTP to get the closest thing to it.
But that isn't what he wants. You are offering an incomplete substitute. And you did so without acknowledging that it is incomplete.
What he wants is to compete online without putting in the work others do to get to a level he didn’t rightfully achieve. It’s completely unfair to take a guy like pitchingrebel for example and allow someone who bought the game yesterday to be able to even come close to beating him. You LOse. You learn. And you improve. That’s what gaming is.
-
After reading a few posts from you guys it is now clear to me that several of you are not comprehending anything I have said. You read it, but don’t comprehend it. Maybe I did a poor job of explaining it, but none the less, result is you don’t get it.
-
@sean_87__psn said in Questions still not answered:
After reading a few posts from you guys it is now clear to me that several of you are not comprehending anything I have said. You read it, but don’t comprehend it. Maybe I did a poor job of explaining it, but none the less, result is you don’t get it.
Download OOTP problem solved
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
@sean_87__psn said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@sean_87__psn said in Questions still not answered:
After reading a few posts from you guys it is now clear to me that several of you are not comprehending anything I have said. You read it, but don’t comprehend it. Maybe I did a poor job of explaining it, but none the less, result is you don’t get it.
Download OOTP problem solved
It’s disturbing to me that you still can’t comprehend simple explanations. I am beginning to wonder if you have a cognitive disorder.
The literal only way to have players in a game play to their real life counterparts like you want is a sim like OOTP, you will never ever get that in a user controlled game. So go download OOTP to get what you want
-
@yankblan_psn said in Questions still not answered:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Questions still not answered:
Quick Question? What about folks with disibilities like muscular dystrophy or something that effects reaction should those folks be excluded from making it fair to compete?
Yes; that’s why there’s Special Olympics.
Very rude!! Get the hell outta here! Punk!
-
This post is deleted!
-
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Questions still not answered:
@yankblan_psn said in Questions still not answered:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Questions still not answered:
Quick Question? What about folks with disibilities like muscular dystrophy or something that effects reaction should those folks be excluded from making it fair to compete?
Yes; that’s why there’s Special Olympics.
Very rude!! Get the hell outta here! Punk!
How is that rude? People with disabilities compete at the special Olympics to make the competition level fair for them..
How is it rude? By implying that the only sports people with dissabilities can partake in is the Special Olympics! I find it very rude and racist toward people with disabilities.
Same thing people said to Jackie Robinson . "That's what the Negro League is for!" Same exact premise and i am apauled.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@jogger171717_psn said in Questions still not answered:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Questions still not answered:
@the_canuckler said in Questions still not answered:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Questions still not answered:
@yankblan_psn said in Questions still not answered:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Questions still not answered:
Quick Question? What about folks with disibilities like muscular dystrophy or something that effects reaction should those folks be excluded from making it fair to compete?
Yes; that’s why there’s Special Olympics.
Very rude!! Get the hell outta here! Punk!
How is that rude? People with disabilities compete at the special Olympics to make the competition level fair for them..
How is it rude? By implying that the only sports people with dissabilities can partake in is the Special Olympics! I find it very rude and racist toward people with disabilities.
Same thing people said to Jackie Robinson . "That's what the Negro League is for!" Same exact premise and i am apauled.
“Racist towards people with disabilities”
I wasn’t aware disabled is a race, but whatever.
I believe the poster meant to say ableist, which is exactly how I took the comment as well. This thread is a perfect example of the "toxicity" that I see in online gaming.
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!