It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties
-
@Original_Quad said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
I made a post about this earlier in the year. The system needs to be redesigned so each player has a rating at each specific system. I wish I could find the post I made for it, but for example bellinger would be 100% in the OF and at 1B, but like 10% of his fielding ability everywhere else or something like that.
More importantly it would mean we don’t have as many people playing stupid secondary positions perfectly - Mookie comes to mind as somebody who would get like 60% at 2B, while catcher is even more noteworthy in general. Schwarber, who hasn’t caught in years, would be like 30% behind the plate.
Yeah those are the two I was thinking of, as well. This information is easily quantifiable and readily available, it shouldn't be difficult to implement.
I don't remember the PA threshold SDS uses when determining secondary position eligibility, but Schwarber definitely didn't meet it at C. And he definitely doesn't warrant the "x% reduction in fielding because secondary" treatment.
-
@brayden_lhp said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
100% agree can't even remember the last time I saw Bellinger play right
Especially with Betts there now.
-
With the "Quirks/Perks" system, I imagine that it wouldn't be hard to make a Perk that makes it so that they have reduced or even no penalty to their secondary positions. They could call it "Utility-Man" or "Team Player" or something.
There ya go, SDS. We have figured this out.
-
@BodamEscapePlan said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
With the "Quirks/Perks" system, I imagine that it wouldn't be hard to make a Perk that makes it so that they have reduced or even no penalty to their secondary positions. They could call it "Utility-Man" or "Team Player" or something.
There ya go, SDS. We have figured this out.
I like it. From an actual baseball perspective any shortstop can easily play 3rd or 2nd without really losing anything. Outfield to infield is a really tough sell, and even right or left moving to center is not an easy transition.
I think a utility perk for those rare guys that can really exceed at multiple positions makes sense. I also think a decreased penalty for SS moving to 3rd or 2nd makes a lot of sense too though it really hasn't been that big of a deal.
-
Also CF should be able to move to R or Left with a decreased penalty. You're essentially cutting their job in half, though you are adding the necessity of navigating foul ground and the edges, so some penalty makes sense.
-
@Hubijerk said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@BodamEscapePlan said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
With the "Quirks/Perks" system, I imagine that it wouldn't be hard to make a Perk that makes it so that they have reduced or even no penalty to their secondary positions. They could call it "Utility-Man" or "Team Player" or something.
There ya go, SDS. We have figured this out.
I like it. From an actual baseball perspective any shortstop can easily play 3rd or 2nd without really losing anything. Outfield to infield is a really tough sell, and even right or left moving to center is not an easy transition.
I think a utility perk for those rare guys that can really exceed at multiple positions makes sense. I also think a decreased penalty for SS moving to 3rd or 2nd makes a lot of sense too though it really hasn't been that big of a deal.
I would say most people would agree that this would be the simplest route to fixing this issue. Personally, I would love it. I always seem to be playing a shortstop at 2B and a CF in all three of my outfield spots.
-
I like the idea up there ^^ of a mr utility quirk that cancels the negative penalty to fielding if that player is in their secondary
-
@ZayFeaR_ said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
I like the idea up there ^^ of a mr utility quirk that cancels the negative penalty to fielding if that player is in their secondary
But it should be a rare perk, it could actually be a pretty powerful perk.
-
I absolutely agree with this, but I also think they need to take away some of the extra secondaries. Some guys haven’t played there in years or at all.
If I remember correctly, they usually give third baseman a 1B secondary and vice versa. Same for middle infielders. I know they said in one stream that every CF automatically gets both corners and every corner OFer gets the other corner.
-
@bhall09 said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
I absolutely agree with this, but I also think they need to take away some of the extra secondaries. Some guys haven’t played there in years or at all.
If I remember correctly, they usually give third baseman a 1B secondary and vice versa. Same for middle infielders. I know they said in one stream that every CF automatically gets both corners and every corner OFer gets the other corner.
I think the arbitrary awarding of secondary positions like that does need to go. Every MLB LF can't play RF, or vice versa. I think it should simply be based on what positions they actually do play (or did play the prior season in the case of at launch).
-
You'd have to go both ways then.
There are players that play multiple positions and statically arent great at one or multiple positions. For context, Albert Pujols is a gold level 1B easy, he should be a bronze at 3B by his career numbers there. -
@Chuck_Dizzle29 said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
You'd have to go both ways then.
There are players that play multiple positions and statically arent great at one or multiple positions. For context, Albert Pujols is a gold level 1B easy, he should be a bronze at 3B by his career numbers there.That's exactly right, that was the idea by going off their actual performance on a per position basis.
-
Ummmm, This is Diamond Dynasty. We play with people who have been dead for over 50 years. Whining about secondary penalties and what positions listed as secondary is important?
Smh. Kids these days
-
@CalisGW said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
Ummmm, This is Diamond Dynasty. We play with people who have been dead for over 50 years. Whining about secondary penalties and what positions listed as secondary is important?
Smh. Kids these days
Yeah, okay. Suggesting an improvement is whining.
Thank you for your valuable input on the topic.
-
@LankyRyan said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@CalisGW said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
Ummmm, This is Diamond Dynasty. We play with people who have been dead for over 50 years. Whining about secondary penalties and what positions listed as secondary is important?
Smh. Kids these days
Yeah, okay. Suggesting an improvement is whining.
Thanks for taking the time to actually whine instead of having any sort of input at all, gramps.
Your whole argument is that secondary positions in how it currently is implemented is not realistic. My counter point was that WE ARE PLAYING WITH DEAD PEOPLE. Had to put in caps because it flew over your head the first time.
-
@LankyRyan said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@CalisGW said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
Ummmm, This is Diamond Dynasty. We play with people who have been dead for over 50 years. Whining about secondary penalties and what positions listed as secondary is important?
Smh. Kids these days
Yeah, okay. Suggesting an improvement is whining.
Thank you for your valuable input on the topic.
Nice Edit job, too bad I already quoted you ( see post above )
-
@CalisGW said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@LankyRyan said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@CalisGW said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
Ummmm, This is Diamond Dynasty. We play with people who have been dead for over 50 years. Whining about secondary penalties and what positions listed as secondary is important?
Smh. Kids these days
Yeah, okay. Suggesting an improvement is whining.
Thanks for taking the time to actually whine instead of having any sort of input at all, gramps.
Your whole argument is that secondary positions in how it currently is implemented is not realistic. My counter point was that WE ARE PLAYING WITH DEAD PEOPLE. Had to put in caps because it flew over your head the first time.
No, my argument is that the current system is arbitrary and needs to be revised, hence the title of this thread and its subsequent contents.
Don't disguise your angry ramblings as a counter point. You're not making a counter point. You just need to be a [censored] somewhere and I guess I'm the lucky winner.
-
@CalisGW said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@LankyRyan said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@CalisGW said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
Ummmm, This is Diamond Dynasty. We play with people who have been dead for over 50 years. Whining about secondary penalties and what positions listed as secondary is important?
Smh. Kids these days
Yeah, okay. Suggesting an improvement is whining.
Thank you for your valuable input on the topic.
Nice Edit job, too bad I already quoted you ( see post above )
The original is more accurate, but more harsh than I wanted to be, hence the edit.
-
@LankyRyan said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@bhall09 said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
I absolutely agree with this, but I also think they need to take away some of the extra secondaries. Some guys haven’t played there in years or at all.
If I remember correctly, they usually give third baseman a 1B secondary and vice versa. Same for middle infielders. I know they said in one stream that every CF automatically gets both corners and every corner OFer gets the other corner.
I think the arbitrary awarding of secondary positions like that does need to go. Every MLB LF can't play RF, or vice versa. I think it should simply be based on what positions they actually do play (or did play the prior season in the case of at launch).
Ryan, here's where I have to disagree. Just about every highschool LF can play RF, a professional athlete dedicating his life to the game can most certainly do the same. Honestly it would take 1 or 2 sessions of shagging flies during BP to get a feel for it.
-
@Hubijerk said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@LankyRyan said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
@bhall09 said in It's Time To Revisit Secondary Position Penalties:
I absolutely agree with this, but I also think they need to take away some of the extra secondaries. Some guys haven’t played there in years or at all.
If I remember correctly, they usually give third baseman a 1B secondary and vice versa. Same for middle infielders. I know they said in one stream that every CF automatically gets both corners and every corner OFer gets the other corner.
I think the arbitrary awarding of secondary positions like that does need to go. Every MLB LF can't play RF, or vice versa. I think it should simply be based on what positions they actually do play (or did play the prior season in the case of at launch).
Ryan, here's where I have to disagree. Just about every highschool LF can play RF, a professional athlete dedicating his life to the game can most certainly do the same. Honestly it would take 1 or 2 sessions of shagging flies during BP to get a feel for it.
The angles take some getting used to for outfielders, but aside from the speed, speed, arm, and natural fielding aptitude factors, I agree with you for the most part.
If a player plays LF as well as RF, they shouldn't get a secondary position penalty, but in the current setup, they do.
