Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19
-
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@nflman2033 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
That’s why wRC+ is the better stat. It tells us who is truly the better hitter. Base stats don’t take enough factors into account.
And no, I don’t believe in just using wRC+.
OPS and OPS+ both have a lot of value as well.Also, all star appearances tell nothing about who is the better hitter. Just like RBI tells nothing about a hitters ability.
Not disagreeing, but it tells me how the player was regarded amongst his peers. Lile I said Carter was considered one of the best players of his best position, but Huff never was.
Like I said, I watched them both play and would have never considered Huff better.
Again, that’s the beauty of the stats we have now. They show the true value of players much better than the “eye test”
No they don’t all the time. There are more of them. Many of which are overused by people who don’t understand them and there limitations
-
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@abbyspapa said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@nflman2033 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@nflman2033 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
That’s why wRC+ is the better stat. It tells us who is truly the better hitter. Base stats don’t take enough factors into account.
And no, I don’t believe in just using wRC+.
OPS and OPS+ both have a lot of value as well.Also, all star appearances tell nothing about who is the better hitter. Just like RBI tells nothing about a hitters ability.
Not disagreeing, but it tells me how the player was regarded amongst his peers. Lile I said Carter was considered one of the best players of his best position, but Huff never was.
Like I said, I watched them both play and would have never considered Huff better.
Again, that’s the beauty of the stats we have now. They show the true value of players much better than the “eye test”
That or sabermetric values are overrated. Not saying I believe that, but there are always alternative explanations for things.
In the case of Carter, he is probably worth less to his team because his mentality was to put the ball in play rather than to just get on base. Which would indicate high RBI vs low BB total. I will always contest that there is a place for that kind of mentality. I think all stats only tell part of the picture. The stats say everyone who can get on base probabilities are they are going to score runs. But life doesn't always work that way, I think you need a guy like Carter who is going to put the ball in play with a runner on base rather than try and draw a walk.
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@nflman2033 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
That’s why wRC+ is the better stat. It tells us who is truly the better hitter. Base stats don’t take enough factors into account.
And no, I don’t believe in just using wRC+.
OPS and OPS+ both have a lot of value as well.Also, all star appearances tell nothing about who is the better hitter. Just like RBI tells nothing about a hitters ability.
Not disagreeing, but it tells me how the player was regarded amongst his peers. Lile I said Carter was considered one of the best players of his best position, but Huff never was.
Like I said, I watched them both play and would have never considered Huff better.
Again, that’s the beauty of the stats we have now. They show the true value of players much better than the “eye test”
As long as you value more than any one whole stat. That seems to be where this argument gets hung up.
The only people who think sabermetrics are wrong or overrated are people that believe a player was better than he truly was. Often times, metrics prove players were not as good as people remember, and that makes people upset.
You said yourself that you’re old, so it’s only natural you wouldn’t really understand. Humans are stubborn and don’t like new ideas, even if they’re better.
So in making the case for objective metrics, you use subjective logic like "you're old so you don't understand" and "Humans are stubborn and don't like new ideas". Both of those statements rely on experience and anecdotal data and can not be objectively proven.
I mean, it’s not wrong though. It’s been shown many times throughout history that people prefer to stick with ideas they already know, and don’t like change even if it’s for the better. Older people tend to not understand new technology as well as younger people that have grown up with it. There’s nothing wrong about that.
Ugh that is a just poor thinking it is literally the definition of prejudice. You are pre judging based on age when the truth is the differences within a population can be as drastic as the differences between populations. You need to stop trying to do any form of analysis. Your assumptions, much like sabermetrics are painfully flawed
-
@SaveFarris said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@yankblan said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
Who's to know in 5, 10 or 20 years if a new fWARLGBTQ+commaVBT23-DC stat won't be better.
If another stat comes along that's better than the ones that currently exist, I'd be happy to hear it's arguments.
Until then, use the best we've got now. Which is WAR, not "Back in my day, Joe Carter was the ****! Now get off my lawn!!!"
No....you use multiple imperfect stats to triangulate. You should NEVER use a singular stat no matter how good you think it is. This is the example of pseudoscience and not understanding stats that is prevalent amongst the sabermetrics community.
-
Oh my god SDS just give carter a signature series card so we can stop seeing this stupid post.
-
@pfcorporate said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
Oh my god SDS just give carter a signature series card so we can stop seeing this stupid post.
Or judge
-
2017 Hardware (AL ROY) Aaron Judge
Con r 84 (.298)
Con l 50 (.230)
Pow r 117 (9.8)
Pow l 88 (14.1)
Vis low
Disc 125 -
@ClearwaterDoug said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
2017 Hardware (AL ROY) Aaron Judge
Con r 84 (.298)
Con l 50 (.230)
Pow r 117 (9.8)
Pow l 88 (14.1)
Vis low
Disc 125How about all 125
-
Well this year you get an awesome gold version!
-
125 vision judge to make up for it! Huzzah!
-
@greenbuk75 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
125 vision judge to make up for it! Huzzah!
If he wasn’t injured tbh
-
@KierannosaurusK said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@greenbuk75 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
125 vision judge to make up for it! Huzzah!
If he wasn’t injured tbh
That's why he needs a sig series now until he can upgrade himself for his live card
-
@greenbuk75 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@KierannosaurusK said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
@greenbuk75 said in Aaron Judge did not get a single flashback in MLB 19:
125 vision judge to make up for it! Huzzah!
If he wasn’t injured tbh
That's why he needs a sig series now until he can upgrade himself for his live card
That makes sense. They might have to make defensive stats go to 125 for him!
-
A admin locked this topic on
