Nimmo
-
He has plenty of power for Singers stadium
-
Yeah 11 wins on a All Star is def a bit much. I've gotten single wins on All Star in conquest before, but that was some time into the year against a standard roster. At this moment most of the New Threads mini seasons CPU teams have a better roster than I do, so that's a tall order.
Hope that doesn't become standard for getting some mini seasons cards. It's fine to lock extra packs behind that, but not so much exclusive cards.
-
I’ll say this, you don’t have to do it all in one run, and if you take the challenge on, you’ll get better at the game and you’ll be to do it. Win as many as you can, and if you find you’re not making the playoffs, switch to a lower difficulty and then try to get more wins the next run.
-
@jcassaro44_PSN yeah. I don't like anything under allstar. Messes up my timing in ranked or DQ
-
Oh I know and agree that Bo and Kyle are much better cards. I finished the collection but I try to grind cards as much as I can. I play for fun not to compete and my experience was the grind for Nimmo was excessive and the card is mediocre comparatively. Just my opinion and experience and no judgment for those that love Nimmo cards.
-
I am in full agreement that the all star requirement is a bad direction to go. Just not good game design to force difficulty in this situation.
I have yet to use Tucker because I dont want to take Nimmo, Adolis, or McNeil out of my new threads lineup. Adolis is easily the worst of those cards, but the celebration animation is worth it
-
11 wins on all-star in a mini season is easier then getting 5 wins on all-star in events. The computer misses way more and you team is as restricted
-
I assume this complaint is from strictly offline players - because, if you can't easily beat cpu on all star, I'm not sure how you'd ever win a game online. I like anything that pushes people away from picking low difficulties - grinding on rookie with blank canvas stadium is pretty boring, it shouldn't be the best way to grind
-
I'm offline only basically, and yes... All Star is pushing it for me. I likely won't even try for it as most likely I will need 20 plus games to get it if I'm being honest
-
can I play a short season+playoffs and complete task if I never lose?
-
@Blaiseblaise
Yes, the 7 game option gives you 7 season games, then you’ll play at least 6 playoff games
-
I assume this complaint is from strictly offline players - because, if you can't easily beat cpu on all star, I'm not sure how you'd ever win a game online. I like anything that pushes people away from picking low difficulties - grinding on rookie with blank canvas stadium is pretty boring, it shouldn't be the best way to grind
I fully agree that cheese stadium grinding on rookie, or any difficulty, shouldn't be the best way to grind. I'm actually curious how much overlap there is though: things like blank canvas are popular among online players who treat offline as just that: a grind. I know I personally rarely use those stadium. Obviously some casuals do but I imagine they are more widespread among the hardcore players.
I just dont think you, or SDS, should really be concerned if people don't want to push themselves further. If the extra pxp isnt enough incentive, who cares?
Keep in mind also the average player is also playing on a TV with a wireless controller: as it should be. Thats how normal people play console video games. Obviously you can still do fine on all star with that set up, but then throw in a large portion of players are 40+ with potentially slower reaction times.
Im all for players to be rewarded with faster rewards for playing higher difficulties. Like win 11 games on All Star OR win a 28 game season championship seems fair.
I'm just baffled at anyone thought this was a good idea.
-
11 wins is excessive. 5 home runs is also excessive. 5 extra base hits would have been a better choice
