Another game of dominating opponent
-
Might want to delete the users you called out. Kinda against the forum rules.
-
You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic? -
@TheBigPapa55_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:
Might want to delete the users you called out. Kinda against the forum rules.
I’m not breaking any rules, there’s nothing in the forum by praising other users. There is if you suggest cheating or other negative connotations. Technically speaking you break it by dabbling in a toxic post which most people would assume is toxic, depends on how you classify it.
-
@Chrono_Omega_PSN
You cant call out other users by name, its against the TOS. -
@chrono_omega_psn maybe read the TOS before saying that your not breaking any rules, it's in the TOS that your not allowed to post people's names on your posts
-
“Post any IDs or any other information of players you suspect to be cheating. You can report them to theshow.com/support. Please include any additional information you may have.”
Do you guys genuinely don’t read and it shows. There’s never anything in the code of conduct stating praise of past users. Please read everyone.
-
@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:
You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.
-
@chrono_omega_psn read the part where it says PLEASE DO NOT post any IDs or any information of players, so before you accuse us of not reading the TOS maybe you should read the WHOLE THING 1ST
-
And then right after, it’s says suspect of cheating. Please read it again. Because technically replying to you I have your user id in my response.
-
@Chrono_Omega_PSN
There have been multiple players banned for leaking usernames of players who they were not accusing of cheating -
@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:
@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:
You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.
But what about all the times you are beating clearly superior opponents? If what you claim is true, that there is no skill involved, surely this would have been an issue for you too?
-
@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:
@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:
@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:
You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.
But what about all the times you are beating clearly superior opponents? If what you claim is true, that there is no skill involved, surely this would have been an issue for you too?
Most of the time the better opponent wins, does that disqualify all the times I’ve been gifted opportunities? No. I look at as when 2 good teams play each other in real life, you’re more likely to see a 2-1 series more than a sweep. And if a sweep happens tip your cap. It can go either way against good players, but in no universe should a really bad player get more opportunities then someone who is outplaying them 10 fold.
-
@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:
@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:
@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:
@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:
You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.
But what about all the times you are beating clearly superior opponents? If what you claim is true, that there is no skill involved, surely this would have been an issue for you too?
Most of the time the better opponent wins, does that disqualify all the times I’ve been gifted opportunities? No. I look at as when 2 good teams play each other in real life, you’re more likely to see a 2-1 series more than a sweep. And if a sweep happens tip your cap. It can go either way against good players, but in no universe should a really bad player get more opportunities then someone who is outplaying them 10 fold.
So you say that if two good players match up; the better player of the two will win.
But then you state that skill doesn't matter.
So how did the better player win?
