No pack rewards for season 2 collection after 250?
-
So if they put too many cards in a programs people complain that should have added more rewards. When they require a higher percentage of fewer cards to be collected we say they are pay to win.
I think maybe they realized that people needed help the first time and offered it gradually through season 2. But... there is a lull between now and season 3. I expect for them to adde some freebies within the next 2 weeks.
-
They should create a collection just for icons with a pack reward.
-
@OlSkoolE63_MLBTS said in No pack rewards for season 2 collection after 250?:
They should create a collection just for icons with a pack reward.
Yeah - once you find a few banners and icons you like to use, what is the point of them?
Why is there no collection for banners/icons?
-
@fellspointguy_MLBTS said in No pack rewards for season 2 collection after 250?:
So if they put too many cards in a programs people complain that should have added more rewards. When they require a higher percentage of fewer cards to be collected we say they are pay to win.
I think maybe they realized that people needed help the first time and offered it gradually through season 2. But... there is a lull between now and season 3. I expect for them to adde some freebies within the next 2 weeks.
I think you nailed the issue plum with your first two sentences. When groups of people would complain loudly when either of two options are carried out, then the conclusion is that some people just want to complain because it makes them feel better.
My conclusion is that DD and coop are competition modes, and some people just expect that they should be at the top of the pyramid and if they aren't then it's the fault of the game and they will complain about it from that point of view. It's the same as players in real athletics who blame the coaches when they don't get playing time. Yes, in some cases those complaints may be fair. But, in most cases the lack of playing time is due to the hard reality that they simply are not as good as the players who are starting.
-
@PriorFir4383355_XBL said in No pack rewards for season 2 collection after 250?:
@fellspointguy_MLBTS said in No pack rewards for season 2 collection after 250?:
So if they put too many cards in a programs people complain that should have added more rewards. When they require a higher percentage of fewer cards to be collected we say they are pay to win.
I think maybe they realized that people needed help the first time and offered it gradually through season 2. But... there is a lull between now and season 3. I expect for them to adde some freebies within the next 2 weeks.
I think you nailed the issue plum with your first two sentences. When groups of people would complain loudly when either of two options are carried out, then the conclusion is that some people just want to complain because it makes them feel better.
My conclusion is that DD and coop are competition modes, and some people just expect that they should be at the top of the pyramid and if they aren't then it's the fault of the game and they will complain about it from that point of view. It's the same as players in real athletics who blame the coaches when they don't get playing time. Yes, in some cases those complaints may be fair. But, in most cases the lack of playing time is due to the hard reality that they simply are not as good as the players who are starting.
I really don't understand your point here. You don't think we should expect additional rewards past 250? And who would complain for the opposite? I guess only players that didn't work hard enough to earn those cards.
So in your analogy WE are the starters that worked hard to earn it? And the bench players are the ones with less than 250 cards? It's confusing.
-
I was for certain thinking they would add something on Friday and shocked they didn’t. Maybe next week but seems so late since set 3 starts in a week.
-
The game has felt more thrown together. Next week they will throw it in on us like they have been
-
Or....They created a Second Collection that Included Everything that would've been between 250 and 400 so people that maybe didn't collect that many could have access to those. You're free Homestretch packs are in the Action Figure Collection...Not to mention a Draft Pack, HRD Pack and All Star Pack. Oh! And 3 other 99's.
-
@fellspointguy_MLBTS I think people expected similar content to last season, like some homestretch packs in the collection. Collecting an 150 cards for an icon is an absolute joke. Some no sell homestretch packs would have been the least they could do.
-
I still believe that they might do something. The season still has some time.
-
Maybe they give us a few season 3 cards for the levels between 250 and 400. That would be cool.
-
@BiigD008_XBL said in No pack rewards for season 2 collection after 250?:
Maybe they give us a few season 3 cards for the levels between 250 and 400. That would be cool.
I’ll take more season 2 cards but nothing between 250 and 400 cards is odd
-
There's also no recap program with tons of packs like there was for season 1.
-
I feel like now they only did that because the majority of people hadn’t unlocked most of the collection bosses because none of us could afford the packs that early in the year. We were all still trying to get all the live cards first.
-
Between the AS collection, the action figure collection i think those were the extra rewards.
-
@P0pa-Cherry_XBL said in No pack rewards for season 2 collection after 250?:
There's also no recap program with tons of packs like there was for season 1.
Yes disappointing as well
-
@dbub_PSN said in No pack rewards for season 2 collection after 250?:
I just don't like getting the same rewards as people who barely got to 250 cards.
250+ was insanely easy to get to this season.
Adding to that, it looks like out of the 311 I've locked, only about 12 were sellable.
So just by playing the game I have approximately 300 AND I've been on vacation so I don't even have any cards from Moments of Glory or Moonshot.
-
@virusts_XBL 150 cards for an icon is inexcusable.