My annual assessment of this game
-
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
The person that feels the need to announce that you’ve blocked someone, and then tag them, as you just did, have done on your main account, and admitted ownership of both by saying you will block me just like you did on your “other account.” The person that attacks on behalf of you like its their job. The person making victimhood claims about “the point of the thread from the beginning” when it’s your thread. It just takes some simple intuition to connect dots. This and the charade of doubling down on the lies when caught is the saddest thing I’ve seen here, by far. Please get help.
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Bro, while everyone in this thread has gone a bit off the deep end you are acting like you were super nice and pleasant from the beginning. I think admitting your own faults here would go a long way.
I have faults, of course. We all do. But I don’t feel obligated to air them here.
As far as the deep end goes, one person and their 3 accounts posting here stands out in particular.
-
For the love of whatever, can we please lock/remove this threat? Enough already!!!
-
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
The person that feels the need to announce that you’ve blocked someone, and then tag them, as you just did, have done on your main account, and admitted ownership of both by saying you will block me just like you did on your “other account.” The person that attacks on behalf of you like its their job. The person making victimhood claims about “the point of the thread from the beginning” when it’s your thread. It just takes some simple intuition to connect dots. This and the charade of doubling down on the lies when caught is the saddest thing I’ve seen here, by far. Please get help.
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Bro, while everyone in this thread has gone a bit off the deep end you are acting like you were super nice and pleasant from the beginning. I think admitting your own faults here would go a long way.
I have faults, of course. We all do. But I don’t feel obligated to air them here.
As far as the deep end goes, one person and their 3 accounts posting here stands out in particular.
Definitely don't have any obligation to do anything on here, none of us actually know each other or owe each other anyone. From an outside observer at first I can see why they were annoyed by your posts, things escalated pretty quickly but I can understand the initial annoyance. That's all I'm trying to say, not trying to rehash or restart anything here.
-
@yankblan_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
For the love of whatever, can we please lock/remove this threat? Enough already!!!
That doesn't seem like the answer at all. People should just stop being personal and try to keep the focus on their opinions of the game. That's what it was intended for in the first place.
-
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
The person that feels the need to announce that you’ve blocked someone, and then tag them, as you just did, have done on your main account, and admitted ownership of both by saying you will block me just like you did on your “other account.” The person that attacks on behalf of you like its their job. The person making victimhood claims about “the point of the thread from the beginning” when it’s your thread. It just takes some simple intuition to connect dots. This and the charade of doubling down on the lies when caught is the saddest thing I’ve seen here, by far. Please get help.
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Bro, while everyone in this thread has gone a bit off the deep end you are acting like you were super nice and pleasant from the beginning. I think admitting your own faults here would go a long way.
I have faults, of course. We all do. But I don’t feel obligated to air them here.
As far as the deep end goes, one person and their 3 accounts posting here stands out in particular.
Definitely don't have any obligation to do anything on here, none of us actually know each other or owe each other anyone. From an outside observer at first I can see why they were annoyed by your posts, things escalated pretty quickly but I can understand the initial annoyance. That's all I'm trying to say, not trying to rehash or restart anything here.
Is he talking about me in that quote? Its funny that he still think I am running all these accounts. I couldn't care less about any of this stuff, I run this account and that's literally it. If I have something to say, I'll do it on this one as I have proven year after year ban after ban.
-
@raesone_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@yankblan_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
For the love of whatever, can we please lock/remove this threat? Enough already!!!
That doesn't seem like the answer at all. People should just stop being personal and try to keep the focus on their opinions of the game. That's what it was intended for in the first place.
I get that, but we’re way past this point now. Forget your OP, it’s been drowned for days.
-
lmao imagine posting on your main account one of your alt accounts got banned yall weird frfr
-
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
The person that feels the need to announce that you’ve blocked someone, and then tag them, as you just did, have done on your main account, and admitted ownership of both by saying you will block me just like you did on your “other account.” The person that attacks on behalf of you like its their job. The person making victimhood claims about “the point of the thread from the beginning” when it’s your thread. It just takes some simple intuition to connect dots. This and the charade of doubling down on the lies when caught is the saddest thing I’ve seen here, by far. Please get help.
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Bro, while everyone in this thread has gone a bit off the deep end you are acting like you were super nice and pleasant from the beginning. I think admitting your own faults here would go a long way.
I have faults, of course. We all do. But I don’t feel obligated to air them here.
As far as the deep end goes, one person and their 3 accounts posting here stands out in particular.
Definitely don't have any obligation to do anything on here, none of us actually know each other or owe each other anyone. From an outside observer at first I can see why they were annoyed by your posts, things escalated pretty quickly but I can understand the initial annoyance. That's all I'm trying to say, not trying to rehash or restart anything here.
Yes, I could have been more diplomatic. I didn’t predict that saying I wouldn’t read something because of its small sample size would have such an effect. I could have suggested they consider playing more online before writing an annual review. But I’m not sure that turns out any differently.
I prefer this thread stay up. Shame is not the best method, but can be a useful tool for changing behavior. And considering the capacity for lying on display, the evidence should remain easily accessible. Exhibit A above.
-
I honestly think the frustration people seem to have with the OP is that he seems to be VERY active on this forum. He seems to comment & post on almost every single post on here. Like he checks in on here multiple times an hour. While I have no problem with this personally, I’ve seen on other forums where people that constantly comment on everything often start to draw contempt from other members for some reason. I could be wrong but that’s my opinion based on past experience.
-
@irishfist412_xbl said in My annual assessment of this game:
I honestly think the frustration people seem to have with the OP is that he seems to be VERY active on this forum. He seems to comment & post on almost every single post on here. Like he checks in on here multiple times an hour. While I have no problem with this personally, I’ve seen on other forums where people that constantly comment on everything often start to draw contempt from other members for some reason. I could be wrong but that’s my opinion based on past experience.
Bob does the exact same thing, yet you chose to point that argument towards me. He even accidentally liked one of my posts 2 days ago when there hadn't been any activity for a few hours. Unfortunately for him I was reading a different thread and I saw it before he quickly undid his mistake. You can read back and see how he replies even when he's not directly addressed. I do the same yes, but this is my thread isn't it? I created it. So its interesting that you point me out for this behavior, but not him. I know the answer because I know you liked some of his posts. You are biased towards his opinions, just like Owl is. Which is totally fine, but don't try to act like Switzerland when you are in fact biased towards one or the other.
-
@raesone_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@irishfist412_xbl said in My annual assessment of this game:
I honestly think the frustration people seem to have with the OP is that he seems to be VERY active on this forum. He seems to comment & post on almost every single post on here. Like he checks in on here multiple times an hour. While I have no problem with this personally, I’ve seen on other forums where people that constantly comment on everything often start to draw contempt from other members for some reason. I could be wrong but that’s my opinion based on past experience.
Bob does the exact same thing, yet you chose to point that argument towards me. He even accidentally liked one of my posts 2 days ago when there hadn't been any activity for a few hours. Unfortunately for him I was reading a different thread and I saw it before he quickly undid his mistake. You can read back and see how he replies even when he's not directly addressed. I do the same yes, but this is my thread isn't it? I created it. So its interesting that you point me out for this behavior, but not him. I know the answer because I know you liked some of his posts. You are biased towards his opinions, just like Owl is. Which is totally fine, but don't try to act like Switzerland when you are in fact biased towards one or the other.
You take this forum WAY TO SERIOUSLY
-
@jordan23win_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@raesone_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@irishfist412_xbl said in My annual assessment of this game:
I honestly think the frustration people seem to have with the OP is that he seems to be VERY active on this forum. He seems to comment & post on almost every single post on here. Like he checks in on here multiple times an hour. While I have no problem with this personally, I’ve seen on other forums where people that constantly comment on everything often start to draw contempt from other members for some reason. I could be wrong but that’s my opinion based on past experience.
Bob does the exact same thing, yet you chose to point that argument towards me. He even accidentally liked one of my posts 2 days ago when there hadn't been any activity for a few hours. Unfortunately for him I was reading a different thread and I saw it before he quickly undid his mistake. You can read back and see how he replies even when he's not directly addressed. I do the same yes, but this is my thread isn't it? I created it. So its interesting that you point me out for this behavior, but not him. I know the answer because I know you liked some of his posts. You are biased towards his opinions, just like Owl is. Which is totally fine, but don't try to act like Switzerland when you are in fact biased towards one or the other.
You take this forum WAY TO SERIOUSLY
I already debunked any credibility you think you have in your own thread. Going around calling yourself a skilled player and bashing on others while you are in fact very average, that's a quick way to lose any sort of respect.
-
@raesone_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@irishfist412_xbl said in My annual assessment of this game:
I honestly think the frustration people seem to have with the OP is that he seems to be VERY active on this forum. He seems to comment & post on almost every single post on here. Like he checks in on here multiple times an hour. While I have no problem with this personally, I’ve seen on other forums where people that constantly comment on everything often start to draw contempt from other members for some reason. I could be wrong but that’s my opinion based on past experience.
Bob does the exact same thing, yet you chose to point that argument towards me. He even accidentally liked one of my posts 2 days ago when there hadn't been any activity for a few hours. Unfortunately for him I was reading a different thread and I saw it before he quickly undid his mistake. You can read back and see how he replies even when he's not directly addressed. I do the same yes, but this is my thread isn't it? I created it. So its interesting that you point me out for this behavior, but not him. I know the answer because I know you liked some of his posts. You are biased towards his opinions, just like Owl is. Which is totally fine, but don't try to act like Switzerland when you are in fact biased towards one or the other.
Sir, I don’t know who Bob is. I pop on here when I have a question or am seeking advice on something in DD. I have zero relationships on this forum, Good or bad. Nor do I know who anybody is. I apologize if I got you upset.
-
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
The person that feels the need to announce that you’ve blocked someone, and then tag them, as you just did, have done on your main account, and admitted ownership of both by saying you will block me just like you did on your “other account.” The person that attacks on behalf of you like its their job. The person making victimhood claims about “the point of the thread from the beginning” when it’s your thread. It just takes some simple intuition to connect dots. This and the charade of doubling down on the lies when caught is the saddest thing I’ve seen here, by far. Please get help.
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Bro, while everyone in this thread has gone a bit off the deep end you are acting like you were super nice and pleasant from the beginning. I think admitting your own faults here would go a long way.
I have faults, of course. We all do. But I don’t feel obligated to air them here.
As far as the deep end goes, one person and their 3 accounts posting here stands out in particular.
Definitely don't have any obligation to do anything on here, none of us actually know each other or owe each other anyone. From an outside observer at first I can see why they were annoyed by your posts, things escalated pretty quickly but I can understand the initial annoyance. That's all I'm trying to say, not trying to rehash or restart anything here.
Yes, I could have been more diplomatic. I didn’t predict that saying I wouldn’t read something because of its small sample size would have such an effect. I could have suggested they consider playing more online before writing an annual review. But I’m not sure that turns out any differently.
I prefer this thread stay up. Shame is not the best method, but can be a useful tool for changing behavior. And considering the capacity for lying on display, the evidence should remain easily accessible. Exhibit A above.
From my perspective the main issue starting this was you and owl questioning Raes' credentials. Then when Raes' presented his credentials and why he felt he was able to make this review you both attacked him as tho he was bragging or saying everyone needed to agree with him and respect his opinion. Things descended into madness from there with the help of everyone, myself included.
-
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
The person that feels the need to announce that you’ve blocked someone, and then tag them, as you just did, have done on your main account, and admitted ownership of both by saying you will block me just like you did on your “other account.” The person that attacks on behalf of you like its their job. The person making victimhood claims about “the point of the thread from the beginning” when it’s your thread. It just takes some simple intuition to connect dots. This and the charade of doubling down on the lies when caught is the saddest thing I’ve seen here, by far. Please get help.
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Bro, while everyone in this thread has gone a bit off the deep end you are acting like you were super nice and pleasant from the beginning. I think admitting your own faults here would go a long way.
I have faults, of course. We all do. But I don’t feel obligated to air them here.
As far as the deep end goes, one person and their 3 accounts posting here stands out in particular.
Definitely don't have any obligation to do anything on here, none of us actually know each other or owe each other anyone. From an outside observer at first I can see why they were annoyed by your posts, things escalated pretty quickly but I can understand the initial annoyance. That's all I'm trying to say, not trying to rehash or restart anything here.
Yes, I could have been more diplomatic. I didn’t predict that saying I wouldn’t read something because of its small sample size would have such an effect. I could have suggested they consider playing more online before writing an annual review. But I’m not sure that turns out any differently.
I prefer this thread stay up. Shame is not the best method, but can be a useful tool for changing behavior. And considering the capacity for lying on display, the evidence should remain easily accessible. Exhibit A above.
From my perspective the main issue starting this was you and owl questioning Raes' credentials. Then when Raes' presented his credentials and why he felt he was able to make this review you both attacked him as tho he was bragging or saying everyone needed to agree with him and respect his opinion. Things descended into madness from there with the help of everyone, myself included.
I agree with this view. I only bring that stuff up when being challenged. And Owl and Bob clearly did, it's there for everyone to see. You attack me, I'll defend myself. You'd do the same.
-
Lmao credentials
-
@hustlinowl_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
Lmao credentials
Do you not know the definition of the word? Noone is saying being a top player at a game makes you a better person than anyone but it would be considered a credential when talking about the game.
-
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
The person that feels the need to announce that you’ve blocked someone, and then tag them, as you just did, have done on your main account, and admitted ownership of both by saying you will block me just like you did on your “other account.” The person that attacks on behalf of you like its their job. The person making victimhood claims about “the point of the thread from the beginning” when it’s your thread. It just takes some simple intuition to connect dots. This and the charade of doubling down on the lies when caught is the saddest thing I’ve seen here, by far. Please get help.
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Bro, while everyone in this thread has gone a bit off the deep end you are acting like you were super nice and pleasant from the beginning. I think admitting your own faults here would go a long way.
I have faults, of course. We all do. But I don’t feel obligated to air them here.
As far as the deep end goes, one person and their 3 accounts posting here stands out in particular.
Definitely don't have any obligation to do anything on here, none of us actually know each other or owe each other anyone. From an outside observer at first I can see why they were annoyed by your posts, things escalated pretty quickly but I can understand the initial annoyance. That's all I'm trying to say, not trying to rehash or restart anything here.
Yes, I could have been more diplomatic. I didn’t predict that saying I wouldn’t read something because of its small sample size would have such an effect. I could have suggested they consider playing more online before writing an annual review. But I’m not sure that turns out any differently.
I prefer this thread stay up. Shame is not the best method, but can be a useful tool for changing behavior. And considering the capacity for lying on display, the evidence should remain easily accessible. Exhibit A above.
From my perspective the main issue starting this was you and owl questioning Raes' credentials. Then when Raes' presented his credentials and why he felt he was able to make this review you both attacked him as tho he was bragging or saying everyone needed to agree with him and respect his opinion. Things descended into madness from there with the help of everyone, myself included.
Show me where I questioned his “credentials.”
-
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
@kovz88_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@bob_loblaw1984 said in My annual assessment of this game:
The person that feels the need to announce that you’ve blocked someone, and then tag them, as you just did, have done on your main account, and admitted ownership of both by saying you will block me just like you did on your “other account.” The person that attacks on behalf of you like its their job. The person making victimhood claims about “the point of the thread from the beginning” when it’s your thread. It just takes some simple intuition to connect dots. This and the charade of doubling down on the lies when caught is the saddest thing I’ve seen here, by far. Please get help.
“You can fool some people sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people all the time.”
Bro, while everyone in this thread has gone a bit off the deep end you are acting like you were super nice and pleasant from the beginning. I think admitting your own faults here would go a long way.
I have faults, of course. We all do. But I don’t feel obligated to air them here.
As far as the deep end goes, one person and their 3 accounts posting here stands out in particular.
Definitely don't have any obligation to do anything on here, none of us actually know each other or owe each other anyone. From an outside observer at first I can see why they were annoyed by your posts, things escalated pretty quickly but I can understand the initial annoyance. That's all I'm trying to say, not trying to rehash or restart anything here.
Yes, I could have been more diplomatic. I didn’t predict that saying I wouldn’t read something because of its small sample size would have such an effect. I could have suggested they consider playing more online before writing an annual review. But I’m not sure that turns out any differently.
I prefer this thread stay up. Shame is not the best method, but can be a useful tool for changing behavior. And considering the capacity for lying on display, the evidence should remain easily accessible. Exhibit A above.
From my perspective the main issue starting this was you and owl questioning Raes' credentials. Then when Raes' presented his credentials and why he felt he was able to make this review you both attacked him as tho he was bragging or saying everyone needed to agree with him and respect his opinion. Things descended into madness from there with the help of everyone, myself included.
Show me where I questioned his “credentials.”
Well since you are already starting with the condescension all I will say is go read through the beginning of this thread again. If you don't think you were standoffish from the beginning then I think you aren't very honest with yourself when you speak about admitting your own flaws. None of us were perfect in this thread, you have admitted to being flawed but refuse to admit any in this thread and blame everyone else for what has happened. You had a part in it too
-
@raesone_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@jordan23win_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@raesone_psn said in My annual assessment of this game:
@irishfist412_xbl said in My annual assessment of this game:
I honestly think the frustration people seem to have with the OP is that he seems to be VERY active on this forum. He seems to comment & post on almost every single post on here. Like he checks in on here multiple times an hour. While I have no problem with this personally, I’ve seen on other forums where people that constantly comment on everything often start to draw contempt from other members for some reason. I could be wrong but that’s my opinion based on past experience.
Bob does the exact same thing, yet you chose to point that argument towards me. He even accidentally liked one of my posts 2 days ago when there hadn't been any activity for a few hours. Unfortunately for him I was reading a different thread and I saw it before he quickly undid his mistake. You can read back and see how he replies even when he's not directly addressed. I do the same yes, but this is my thread isn't it? I created it. So its interesting that you point me out for this behavior, but not him. I know the answer because I know you liked some of his posts. You are biased towards his opinions, just like Owl is. Which is totally fine, but don't try to act like Switzerland when you are in fact biased towards one or the other.
You take this forum WAY TO SERIOUSLY
I already debunked any credibility you think you have in your own thread. Going around calling yourself a skilled player and bashing on others while you are in fact very average, that's a quick way to lose any sort of respect.
Lmao “debunked”. I’m not here for your respect. No one cares how many times you’ve posted in this forum. How is looking for legitimate concerns about the game bashing?
