Rigged
-
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
-
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
Firstly, thank you for your service.
Secondly, you know the game tracks perfects right? We can look at your game history and it says the perfects + the outcome of it.
Your latest game only had one P/P in it, and it was by your opponent for a home run with Castellanos, so what game are you referencing, because your proof will be there.
So provide us the link or website or give us direction where we can track perfect/perfect that go for outs. Game history only provides perfect/perfect for hits (homeruns).
No, as I stated before, it tracks all perfect/perfects and shows both outcomes, both hits and outs, as I said I've double-checked that to make sure when my opponent or I hit a perfect out, it does in fact show up.
-
@OreoRockstar said in Rigged:
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
Ok, you're right. For the first time, I see that they show perfect/perfect go for lined out to CF.
But the OP's point, I think he may be talking about some at-bats where you can hear the distinct "crack" of the bat as you hear in perfect/perfect contacts, but for whatever reason are not considered p/p and just good contact.
I'm guessing, so I could be wrong.
-
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@OreoRockstar said in Rigged:
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
Ok, you're right. For the first time, I see that they show perfect/perfect go for lined out to CF.
But the OP's point, I think he may be talking about some at-bats where you can hear the distinct "crack" of the bat as you hear in perfect/perfect contacts, but for whatever reason are not considered p/p and just good contact.
I'm guessing, so I could be wrong.
Perhaps, but that means the game does not recognize it as P/P, so it cannot be called as such. It's important to make that distinction if that is infact what he was referring to.
-
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@OreoRockstar said in Rigged:
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
Ok, you're right. For the first time, I see that they show perfect/perfect go for lined out to CF.
But the OP's point, I think he may be talking about some at-bats where you can hear the distinct "crack" of the bat as you hear in perfect/perfect contacts, but for whatever reason are not considered p/p and just good contact.
I'm guessing, so I could be wrong.
Perhaps, but that means the game does not recognize it as P/P, so it cannot be called as such. It's important to make that distinction if that is infact what he was referring to.
No, you're right. I realize that now.
But I believe that he wasn't trying to intentionally mislead or exaggerate his experience. As I recall, I had experienced the same thing he did, and you had accused me of embellishing my story based on this honest mistake of distinction lol.
-
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@OreoRockstar said in Rigged:
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
Ok, you're right. For the first time, I see that they show perfect/perfect go for lined out to CF.
But the OP's point, I think he may be talking about some at-bats where you can hear the distinct "crack" of the bat as you hear in perfect/perfect contacts, but for whatever reason are not considered p/p and just good contact.
I'm guessing, so I could be wrong.
Perhaps, but that means the game does not recognize it as P/P, so it cannot be called as such. It's important to make that distinction if that is infact what he was referring to.
No, you're right. I realize that now.
But I believe that he wasn't trying to intentionally mislead or exaggerate his experience. As I recall, I had experienced the same thing he did, and you had accused me of embellishing my story based on this honest mistake of distinction lol.
It's not that I think he was nefariously trying to fool us all, sometimes it's a natural human response to exaggerate a story, but it's important to keep things in perspective and have the facts straight.
It's very easy to rage post, I've definitely done it, but misleading about P/P whether consciously or unconsciously undermines the entire message because it's something that is easily verifiable.
-
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@OreoRockstar said in Rigged:
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
Ok, you're right. For the first time, I see that they show perfect/perfect go for lined out to CF.
But the OP's point, I think he may be talking about some at-bats where you can hear the distinct "crack" of the bat as you hear in perfect/perfect contacts, but for whatever reason are not considered p/p and just good contact.
I'm guessing, so I could be wrong.
Perhaps, but that means the game does not recognize it as P/P, so it cannot be called as such. It's important to make that distinction if that is infact what he was referring to.
No, you're right. I realize that now.
But I believe that he wasn't trying to intentionally mislead or exaggerate his experience. As I recall, I had experienced the same thing he did, and you had accused me of embellishing my story based on this honest mistake of distinction lol.
It's not that I think he was nefariously trying to fool us all, sometimes it's a natural human response to exaggerate a story, but it's important to keep things in perspective and have the facts straight.
It's very easy to rage post, I've definitely done it, but misleading about P/P whether consciously or unconsciously undermines the entire message because it's something that is easily verifiable.
That's what you say.
And to that, I say, "mickey mouse club," "nickels and dimes."
-
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@OreoRockstar said in Rigged:
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
Ok, you're right. For the first time, I see that they show perfect/perfect go for lined out to CF.
But the OP's point, I think he may be talking about some at-bats where you can hear the distinct "crack" of the bat as you hear in perfect/perfect contacts, but for whatever reason are not considered p/p and just good contact.
I'm guessing, so I could be wrong.
Perhaps, but that means the game does not recognize it as P/P, so it cannot be called as such. It's important to make that distinction if that is infact what he was referring to.
No, you're right. I realize that now.
But I believe that he wasn't trying to intentionally mislead or exaggerate his experience. As I recall, I had experienced the same thing he did, and you had accused me of embellishing my story based on this honest mistake of distinction lol.
It's not that I think he was nefariously trying to fool us all, sometimes it's a natural human response to exaggerate a story, but it's important to keep things in perspective and have the facts straight.
It's very easy to rage post, I've definitely done it, but misleading about P/P whether consciously or unconsciously undermines the entire message because it's something that is easily verifiable.
That's what you say.
And to that, I say, "mickey mouse club," "nickels and dimes."
I am culturally illiterate, I don't get a lot of references lol.
-
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@OreoRockstar said in Rigged:
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
Ok, you're right. For the first time, I see that they show perfect/perfect go for lined out to CF.
But the OP's point, I think he may be talking about some at-bats where you can hear the distinct "crack" of the bat as you hear in perfect/perfect contacts, but for whatever reason are not considered p/p and just good contact.
I'm guessing, so I could be wrong.
Perhaps, but that means the game does not recognize it as P/P, so it cannot be called as such. It's important to make that distinction if that is infact what he was referring to.
No, you're right. I realize that now.
But I believe that he wasn't trying to intentionally mislead or exaggerate his experience. As I recall, I had experienced the same thing he did, and you had accused me of embellishing my story based on this honest mistake of distinction lol.
It's not that I think he was nefariously trying to fool us all, sometimes it's a natural human response to exaggerate a story, but it's important to keep things in perspective and have the facts straight.
It's very easy to rage post, I've definitely done it, but misleading about P/P whether consciously or unconsciously undermines the entire message because it's something that is easily verifiable.
That's what you say.
And to that, I say, "mickey mouse club," "nickels and dimes."
I am culturally illiterate, I don't get a lot of references lol.
Simply petty.
-
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@onnagood1 said in Rigged:
@OreoRockstar said in Rigged:
It provides all perfect perfects, not just hits , buts outs too
Ok, you're right. For the first time, I see that they show perfect/perfect go for lined out to CF.
But the OP's point, I think he may be talking about some at-bats where you can hear the distinct "crack" of the bat as you hear in perfect/perfect contacts, but for whatever reason are not considered p/p and just good contact.
I'm guessing, so I could be wrong.
Perhaps, but that means the game does not recognize it as P/P, so it cannot be called as such. It's important to make that distinction if that is infact what he was referring to.
No, you're right. I realize that now.
But I believe that he wasn't trying to intentionally mislead or exaggerate his experience. As I recall, I had experienced the same thing he did, and you had accused me of embellishing my story based on this honest mistake of distinction lol.
It's not that I think he was nefariously trying to fool us all, sometimes it's a natural human response to exaggerate a story, but it's important to keep things in perspective and have the facts straight.
It's very easy to rage post, I've definitely done it, but misleading about P/P whether consciously or unconsciously undermines the entire message because it's something that is easily verifiable.
That's what you say.
And to that, I say, "mickey mouse club," "nickels and dimes."
I am culturally illiterate, I don't get a lot of references lol.
Simply petty.
Gotcha, that's fine, you are entitled to that opinion.
-
I wouldn’t say it’s 100% rigged what happens is in some games the rng will sway in one direction and favor one player and those games SUCK those are the games that you or your opponent can hit anything even if your early/late and it’s nothing but hell for the other person. Then you’ll have other times where it’s even and those are the fun games that keep us regulars coming back. It’s a vicious cycle that none of us can control and it won’t go anywhere since it gives lesser players validation and makes them feel good so they also keep coming back. We just have to accept that it’s in every online game we play weather it be shooters or sports.
-
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@Chase__6 said in Rigged:
Like i said, believe what you want. Probably track stats like they give you hits for perfect perfects
No, I have tested that theory by looking when I hit P/P outs, it displays in the game log even if it is not a hit.
Silly question. When you get in-game feedback that says "Perfect", is that just timed perfectly, or is it by default "perfect/perfect"?
-
@arvcpa said in Rigged:
@eatyum said in Rigged:
@Chase__6 said in Rigged:
Like i said, believe what you want. Probably track stats like they give you hits for perfect perfects
No, I have tested that theory by looking when I hit P/P outs, it displays in the game log even if it is not a hit.
Silly question. When you get in-game feedback that says "Perfect", is that just timed perfectly, or is it by default "perfect/perfect"?
It's both timed correctly and middle PCI. (Though I guess for something like directional, it would likely only be timing + if the pitch is down the middle)
-
It is like the whole "dramatic event experiment" syndrome. 5 people can watch the exact same thing happen and there will be 5 different stories. Some may recall it action for action, some will over exaggerate certain parts that maybe are more surprising to them in their minds than others ect. But none of them are actually lying or trying to mislead anyone.
-
Does the history show groundball, liner or fly ball?
-
@GrxxnLikeGator said in Rigged:
Does the history show groundball, liner or fly ball?
Not specifically no, but if it was a groundout, it would say something like 'Sandberg grounded out to second".
-
A admin locked this topic on
