Now I remember why I left this game
-
@eatyum said in Now I remember why I left this game:
There were 6 perfects in the game between you and your opponent.
Two did go for outs, but only one was in the 8th inning, which was the one you hit with Dwight Evans, Corey Seager also hit one for an out in the 7th.
Though it's weird, it says Posada hit a home run on one in the 8th, but it doesn't show, so I'm going to assume he actually just out.
Even so, why stretch the truth a bit? That would mean you did hit 3 in the game, (Which is ridiculous I'll grant you that), but it wasn't three perfects in the 8th inning. Just tell it like it is
Who in the world goes out and researches someone's rant in an attempt to disprove some minor detail, and then points out the OP was "stretching the truth". Then try to break the post down into some realm of plausibility.
I can tell you who. Someone that has a serious agenda to support a narrative that this game is anything but an RNG.
And, that's ok. But, c'mon, whether it's someone that works for SDS or has a reason to support the game...wouldn't it be better to just ignore the posts that, for the most part, speak the truth about the game. Other than attacking the integrity, reasoning, eyesight, etc of the poster.
You would have to be 9, or very gullible and older, to not understand that MLB the Show is an RNG. The AI dictates the outcome. But, we still have fun with it.
But it's a bummer when ppl try to insult your intelligence by suggesting you're mistaken, lying, "stretching the truth" when you point out the obvious. Whole gang jumps on you with the "conspiracy" or "you're just bad" posts. The weakest is "Well, so-and-so is really good at it so it has to be genuine".
There are no good and bad players in an RNG..there is the AI that, often, determines the outcome. When the code is flowing well and the AI control is subtle and plausible..it's a whole lot of fun.
It's a lot easier to ignore the RNG when you're on the winning side of the randomizer. When you lose it just screams at you.
And, that's what it is. But, I've only been playing for a few weeks so may be mistaken.
-
@SVTJOEY760 said in Now I remember why I left this game:
Yup, when there is a moment the game can screw me it will. Tied 3-3 in the 8th I get 3 and yes 3 perfect perfect line outs to the earning track to retire the side. Next inning my opponent gets a late hit homer in with a ball 3 feet outside the zone. It’s crazy how even though I can get the best possible input you can get, I don’t get rewarded. It really does suck because it’s not even me at the this point, it’s the flawed game
I thought you left this game.
-
I believe we mist hold people accountable when on forums. We have no face to face interaction to gain trust. Research must be done to find if the person typing out these words is reliable.
-
When did fact checking become a bad thing?
-
@eelnirad_anglo said in Now I remember why I left this game:
@eatyum said in Now I remember why I left this game:
There were 6 perfects in the game between you and your opponent.
Two did go for outs, but only one was in the 8th inning, which was the one you hit with Dwight Evans, Corey Seager also hit one for an out in the 7th.
Though it's weird, it says Posada hit a home run on one in the 8th, but it doesn't show, so I'm going to assume he actually just out.
Even so, why stretch the truth a bit? That would mean you did hit 3 in the game, (Which is ridiculous I'll grant you that), but it wasn't three perfects in the 8th inning. Just tell it like it is
Who in the world goes out and researches someone's rant in an attempt to disprove some minor detail, and then points out the OP was "stretching the truth". Then try to break the post down into some realm of plausibility.
I can tell you who. Someone that has a serious agenda to support a narrative that this game is anything but an RNG.
And, that's ok. But, c'mon, whether it's someone that works for SDS or has a reason to support the game...wouldn't it be better to just ignore the posts that, for the most part, speak the truth about the game. Other than attacking the integrity, reasoning, eyesight, etc of the poster.
You would have to be 9, or very gullible and older, to not understand that MLB the Show is an RNG. The AI dictates the outcome. But, we still have fun with it.
But it's a bummer when ppl try to insult your intelligence by suggesting you're mistaken, lying, "stretching the truth" when you point out the obvious. Whole gang jumps on you with the "conspiracy" or "you're just bad" posts. The weakest is "Well, so-and-so is really good at it so it has to be genuine".
There are no good and bad players in an RNG..there is the AI that, often, determines the outcome. When the code is flowing well and the AI control is subtle and plausible..it's a whole lot of fun.
It's a lot easier to ignore the RNG when you're on the winning side of the randomizer. When you lose it just screams at you.
And, that's what it is. But, I've only been playing for a few weeks so may be mistaken.
I guess we have come to a realization that you havent yet. We as the gamers dont have the power to change these things. Neither does a hitter or pitcher in real life. Hard hits get outs. We all struggle with the RNG of the game. We've all seen these posts the entire year. We have moved on and decided we will still play. You should simply decide... Play it or dont support it. But you gotta know what your getting into posting on this forum. Dont act surprised by the response here.
-
@eelnirad_anglo said in Now I remember why I left this game:
@eatyum said in Now I remember why I left this game:
There were 6 perfects in the game between you and your opponent.
Two did go for outs, but only one was in the 8th inning, which was the one you hit with Dwight Evans, Corey Seager also hit one for an out in the 7th.
Though it's weird, it says Posada hit a home run on one in the 8th, but it doesn't show, so I'm going to assume he actually just out.
Even so, why stretch the truth a bit? That would mean you did hit 3 in the game, (Which is ridiculous I'll grant you that), but it wasn't three perfects in the 8th inning. Just tell it like it is
Who in the world goes out and researches someone's rant in an attempt to disprove some minor detail, and then points out the OP was "stretching the truth". Then try to break the post down into some realm of plausibility.
I can tell you who. Someone that has a serious agenda to support a narrative that this game is anything but an RNG.
And, that's ok. But, c'mon, whether it's someone that works for SDS or has a reason to support the game...wouldn't it be better to just ignore the posts that, for the most part, speak the truth about the game. Other than attacking the integrity, reasoning, eyesight, etc of the poster.
You would have to be 9, or very gullible and older, to not understand that MLB the Show is an RNG. The AI dictates the outcome. But, we still have fun with it.
But it's a bummer when ppl try to insult your intelligence by suggesting you're mistaken, lying, "stretching the truth" when you point out the obvious. Whole gang jumps on you with the "conspiracy" or "you're just bad" posts. The weakest is "Well, so-and-so is really good at it so it has to be genuine".
There are no good and bad players in an RNG..there is the AI that, often, determines the outcome. When the code is flowing well and the AI control is subtle and plausible..it's a whole lot of fun.
It's a lot easier to ignore the RNG when you're on the winning side of the randomizer. When you lose it just screams at you.
And, that's what it is. But, I've only been playing for a few weeks so may be mistaken.
It takes a matter of seconds to look at your profile and pull up recent games. Usually when people come here and post this stuff, it's severely exaggerated. Many of us check game logs after a post like this, sorry you got caught.
-
Wait a second there are some people going in on the guy who fact checked?!
Wow that's pathetic
-
@Washed__AF said in Now I remember why I left this game:
Wait a second there are some people going in on the guy who fact checked?!
Wow that's pathetic
I don't even know why it's such a big deal, I even acknowledged the ridiculousness of the perfects he did hit into outs and OP was pretty chill about it.
-
@cavalier_0013 said in Now I remember why I left this game:
The real WOW here is that you would defend a guy who lies
This is surprising in 2020?
-
@Kovz88 said in Now I remember why I left this game:
When did fact checking become a bad thing?
January 2017.
-
@cavalier_0013 said in Now I remember why I left this game:
@Steelerof3Rivers said in Now I remember why I left this game:
I don’t care if this guy exaggerated or not. It’s a gaming forum. Much like fishermen at the camp exaggerating the size of fish, Gamers do the same thing.
What does get me though is that someone would take the time to hop onto their PS4 then look up this guy, Go to his game history & analyze/read up on his past games so they can then “expose” him on here. Just wow. People are just terrible human beings anymore.
You can do it right here on the website.
There is a difference between exaggeration and lying. This is the latter, not the former.
The real WOW here is that you would defend a guy who lies to gain the sympathy from the community when in reality, we have ALL been there and gotten that lousy Perfect-Perfect out and our opponent beat us on a late oppo-taco out of the zone out of the contact circle and withing the vision circle.
Sounds like a play out the liberal democrat handbook to defend the liars
-
@shfdmedic said in Now I remember why I left this game:
@cavalier_0013 said in Now I remember why I left this game:
@Steelerof3Rivers said in Now I remember why I left this game:
I don’t care if this guy exaggerated or not. It’s a gaming forum. Much like fishermen at the camp exaggerating the size of fish, Gamers do the same thing.
What does get me though is that someone would take the time to hop onto their PS4 then look up this guy, Go to his game history & analyze/read up on his past games so they can then “expose” him on here. Just wow. People are just terrible human beings anymore.
You can do it right here on the website.
There is a difference between exaggeration and lying. This is the latter, not the former.
The real WOW here is that you would defend a guy who lies to gain the sympathy from the community when in reality, we have ALL been there and gotten that lousy Perfect-Perfect out and our opponent beat us on a late oppo-taco out of the zone out of the contact circle and withing the vision circle.
Sounds like a play out the liberal democrat handbook to defend the liars
Please be specific.
-
@Bob_Loblaw1984 said in Now I remember why I left this game:
@Kovz88 said in Now I remember why I left this game:
When did fact checking become a bad thing?
January 2017.
Did some research and can confirm this is the comment of the month. Well done.
Now get back to your law blog
-
A admin locked this topic on
