Dustin and George Thoughts?
-
Happy as a sox fan! 90 goose as well!
-
George as in Brett? Haven’t got on yet
-
George Foster. He looks beastly. This actually looks like a great card. Too bad he's going to cost a arm and a leg.
-
@iTsMaGic44 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
George as in Brett? Haven’t got on yet
Sadly, no. Foster.
-
Eh don’t know how I feel about these cards. Foster seems like a good hitting card but all his other attributes leave a lot to be desired. Expected a bit more
-
@CRGDVD said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
@iTsMaGic44 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
George as in Brett? Haven’t got on yet
Sadly, no. Foster.
Foster is wayyy better
-
Not a fan of either. Love Pedroia's swing, especially that 2008 card (it's a separate animation like the Zobrist card) but I don't think anyone will play him over Biggio or Sandberg.
And then Foster. His stats look really good, but he has no speed and I personally hate his swing. His low diamond card was terrible imo.
-
Yuck
.. -
foster’s swing is horrible, pedroia’s stats are horrible. selling.
-
@samguenther1987 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
George Foster. He looks beastly. This actually looks like a great card. Too bad he's going to cost a arm and a leg.
It would be the card I take if I made WS. 105/104 con 109/113 pwr. 82 Vision is probably a little low for higher levels but I think I could live with it
-
As a Sox fan, I’ll probably use Pedroia because I’ve always loved his cards, but this group of cards definitely feels underwhelming for the majority of players.
-
I’m not even gonna lie... I’m disappointed. Not a fan of either of these cards. Was really hoping for someone more exciting like Donaldson, Harper, Verlander, etc. Instead we got a decent left fielder and a pretty iffy second baseman. I’ll be selling.
-
I guess Foster has a terrible stance, I don't mind his swing. He has great hitting stats though! The Gossage looks good as well!
-
@foge011 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
@samguenther1987 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
George Foster. He looks beastly. This actually looks like a great card. Too bad he's going to cost a arm and a leg.
It would be the card I take if I made WS. 105/104 con 109/113 pwr. 82 Vision is probably a little low for higher levels but I think I could live with it
Ok yes the fielding could be better too, it's still the better of the 2 cards in my opinion.
-
@samguenther1987 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
@foge011 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
@samguenther1987 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
George Foster. He looks beastly. This actually looks like a great card. Too bad he's going to cost a arm and a leg.
It would be the card I take if I made WS. 105/104 con 109/113 pwr. 82 Vision is probably a little low for higher levels but I think I could live with it
Ok yes the fielding could be better too, it's still the better of the 2 cards in my opinion.
Fielding is fine to get away with if he had a little more speed. I'm can't wait to make a WS push this season!
-
@olivegarden2 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
I guess Foster has a terrible stance, I don't mind his swing. He has great hitting stats though! The Gossage looks good as well!
That Gossage will be joining my bullpen shortly, I'm depleted after getting the Ducks on the Pond packs yesterday (worth it)
-
Foster looks amazing on paper, Dustin meh
-
Vision really doesn’t mean a thing this year. People use trout on legend
-
@beanball0571 said in Dustin and George Thoughts?:
Vision really doesn’t mean a thing this year. People use trout on legend
Yeah, vision is just the outer PCI. I would rather have contact which Foster and Pedey both have
-
A admin locked this topic on
