@Untchable704 said in Mike trout:
@DoIHearBossMusic said in Mike trout:
@Ricky_Bobby11806 said in Mike trout:
If you don't spend on packs, your odds are relaxed. If you spend for the clout, you'll end up with Trout.
Not sure if youre just joking, but I actually agree with this too, seems like all the diamonds I pulled are right after I added $20 here and there into the game, and even then the diamond value usually matches your cash injection, or close to it. When I pulled Ozzie it was right after I put in $30, and Spencer Howard $20. Just seems to be a pattern
I would think it’s more probably of a system that if you have shown a history of putting money into the game there’s a certain threshold that they would slam your odds if you open packs to try to dwindle you down to no stubs in hopes that history repeats itself and you will buy more stubs.
At least that’s how I would run it if I were going to scam you.
This is true. I do not boast about my pulls or how much I spend in game but , I have spent enough to say I'm about 90% sure, the odds are in favor of those who spend. Once I finished live series collections, pack luck was insane. So insane I'm at 100% in all team affinities.