Community Forum

I've seen folks having this issue when they link their accounts and then lose their game progress. How is this fixed? Any advice?. I linked and then lost all the game progress.

As a below-average player, I feel like this game gives me more than enough content and more than enough rewards for my best efforts.

They're both monster cards. One is a card that should be in everyone's lineup - LS - and one that should in everyone's lineup if they can afford it - Sig.

@sersimpleton said in SDS wants to ensure Yankees have greatest team:

At least make a Bobby bonilla card that costs 10k stubs up front and 1k every week afterwards.

This comment wins the internet for the day.

@KILLERPRESENCE4 said in September POTM:

I think you’re gonna be sorely disappointed. Freddie Freeman is taking that hardware guys. He’s gonna win the MVP and had a monsterous September.

Overcame Corona Virus to MVP caliber year. Yeah, Freeman killed it this year.

94 Chipper finds his way into many of my team builds.

Genuinely interested as well.

This is the funniest and realist post I've seen on here. Good stuff.

Yount's mustache and hair should be reason enough to keep him in the lineup. Peak late-70s early 80s look.

Buying packs. I literally have a post-it note saying "Don't buy packs" on my monitor. I can't resist the urge.

The OG 1970s Bad News Bears.

I'm older so housework is a "hobby" for me these days. Yard work. I work in higher ed, so I take classes for fun every academic year. I read and collect comics too. DD/online modes have been the new addition to my hobbies this year, but I'd played RTTS the last two years.

The Ian Happ Players League card. Sneaky pop and switch hitting.

Personally, I think this is the best fix to the game all year. Makes your entire pitching rotation relevant and your relievers mean so much more as well. Now reliever stamina regen needs addressed.

@SchnauzerFace said in Rogers Hornsby reviews??:

Review of "The Cat in the Hat" film
Written by: Rogers Hornsby

LE DEUXIEME SOUFFLE, a Scandinavian Revival paradigmatic magnum opus from 1966, is incontrovertibly the animus for this insensate ruination; however, the sum of this profligate and bedaubed prodigality does not equiponderate that of the autochthonous Melvillesque enterprise in postwar modernism.

Bo Welch (THE HOBOKEN CHICKEN EMERGENCY, JOE VERSUS THE VOLCANO), notwithstanding this is your incipient photoplay, it is axiomatic that the juncture has transpired for you to be superannuated. You are a maladroit dilettante, and your potentiality to adumbrate the sequential narrative is precariously wanting. Anterior to undertaking an appurtenant fabrication, you ought be necessitated to perpend the efforts of Mauriac and Queneau, and might I suggest CASQUE DOR? This Kammerspiel is obloquy to physicality, and to that, I take great offense.

And what of the ethereal artifice, one might catechize? It subsumes utterly of a duo of contumacious progeny who espy upon an altitudinous feline au fait in the bailiwick of confabulation. The feline acquaints them to a conglomeration of frolicsomeness, and subsequently spoliates their house, whilst the offspring acquiesce all along. The cat is idiosyncratic to behold, and it is the surmise and conjecture of this expositor that the scions are, in fact, quite unprepossessing. It is assuredly no Kiarostami, yet this, too, should have been subjugated to bureaucratic interdiction!

Upon egression of the cinema, an assemblage of puerile children asserted that THE CAT IN THE HAT reminisced of a Mohsen Makhmalbaf, though they were quite mistaken, indeed. It is comparatively that of a Marziyeh Meshkini, though her 2000 masterpiece is proficient at interlacing sagas of multitudinous acumen with paltry exertion.

Emmanuel Lubezki, though authenticated to be of facile expertism as evidenced by such recherchi actualizations as SOLO CON TU PAREJA and MARLENA EN LA PARED, is abominably able to conjure up little more than a Theo van de Sande -- a travesty of Knowlesian admeasurements.

This is an interminable scouring into the vacuous and stodginess, indomitably contriturating into the inauspicious torpidism.

2/10

Seeing non-English words and phrases not italicized gives me fits. Well done.

@Hikes83 said in 99 Carlos Corrasco:

@taco_truck_face said in 99 Carlos Corrasco:

You played Carlos Corrasco. He has a specially made card - as do many MLB players that play The Show.

Wrong on so many fronts

Whoops. thought it was a different card. thought it was one of those player ones... my bad.

@RedJeff83 said in Honus vs Foxx:

I picked Foxx for my 300 star reward. I quickly discovered that is defense is atrocious. I hit ok with him (only about 50 ab’s). Honestly I couldn’t believe how bad he was defensively a 1b, and 3b.
I picked up Honus and, kenley for the Griffey program. Honus plays amazing defense, but his bat has been quiet for me. I honestly thought he would be a right handed Cobb. I only have about 10 ab’s, so maybe I’m pushing it to hard?

What are your experiences with these 2?

Foxx's bat has been top-tier for me since day one. I can't see him ever leaving my lineup for the remainder of the game cycle. I play him at catcher and despite a shaky start behind the plate, he's not had any fielding issues since his first appearance.

Honus gets hits upon hits for me as well. His strong defense+positional versatility is a great asset and when he gets on first, pitchers get distracted anticipating a steal.

Both are great cards.

I've gone all year without prestiging anyone. In this event I've finally prestiged Hershiser and Paxton - easy ones - and I'm one RBI from finishing Tatis. I'm really enjoying this event.

I'm the epitome of a bad/below average RS player. This event has been so much fun for me. So rewarding. I love the fact it feels like a more even playing field with the event. Yes, you may have Mays, a stacked team of prestige cards, and a WS banner, but I still have a fair shake at winning in this event.

I prefer Walker.