Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
@the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Finest Harper: @jogger171717_psn said in Finest Harper: @the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper: @mrad2010_xbl said in Finest Harper: @the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper: I don't like the idea of 2 99 cards, I just don't. And this card will be better than the other one despite 2015 Harper being better than 2021 Harper I mean how can SDS predict Harper would be the MVP this season. He earned MVP before and they released a card for him. He got MVP again so they’re giving him a Finest, Seems only right to me. I don’t see why it’s a problem unless you don’t like Harper. I mean Abreu didn't get a finest card last year. Trout got a Signature series and not a finest in 19(The current finest Trout is completely made up.) the only thing likely to separate finest Harper from award harper is Power vs L, Fielding, and Quirks. Its just a waste when people are still waiting on Puckett etc. And to be clear, I don't hate Harper, far from it. I just thinks that tgis further proves that cards based on the current season are far too juiced. 2015 Harper is arguably the best non-Bonds hitting season of the past 25 years. Legends and non-current season flashbacks deserve more than what they get Harper is easily one of my favorite players, but giving him two 99s is absolutely one of the dumbest things SDS has ever done content-wise. The only way it’ll make sense is if the finest has significantly worse attributes against lefties, significantly worse reaction, but slightly better fielding. But of course they’re going to pretend this year was better than his 2015 season and boost every single attribute out the [censored]. If I were someone that cared about puckett, bagwell, etc., then SDS making a pointless 99 like this is something I’d be furious over. If any at SDS actually cares about stats, they should be ashamed of themselves for even suggesting that Harper’s 2021 season was anywhere close to his 2015 season. I would be with you if this card was a reward for something or part of a program. However, it's a gift, you literally don't have to do anything to earn it. Stop complaining. Don't use it if you don't like it. You know what would have been a better gift? Kirby Puckett. Or literally any other card that didn't have a 99. I would have even accepted a no-hitter card for some of those guys that threw one so early in the season their topps nows are under 90. A Harper card that is marginally better, even with a worse season than 2015 Harper, is stupid. It just seems like fan service for the Phillies fans that have been crying about a Phillies 99 Harper for 3 years
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Finest Harper:
@jogger171717_psn said in Finest Harper: @the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper: @mrad2010_xbl said in Finest Harper: @the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper: I don't like the idea of 2 99 cards, I just don't. And this card will be better than the other one despite 2015 Harper being better than 2021 Harper I mean how can SDS predict Harper would be the MVP this season. He earned MVP before and they released a card for him. He got MVP again so they’re giving him a Finest, Seems only right to me. I don’t see why it’s a problem unless you don’t like Harper. I mean Abreu didn't get a finest card last year. Trout got a Signature series and not a finest in 19(The current finest Trout is completely made up.) the only thing likely to separate finest Harper from award harper is Power vs L, Fielding, and Quirks. Its just a waste when people are still waiting on Puckett etc. And to be clear, I don't hate Harper, far from it. I just thinks that tgis further proves that cards based on the current season are far too juiced. 2015 Harper is arguably the best non-Bonds hitting season of the past 25 years. Legends and non-current season flashbacks deserve more than what they get Harper is easily one of my favorite players, but giving him two 99s is absolutely one of the dumbest things SDS has ever done content-wise. The only way it’ll make sense is if the finest has significantly worse attributes against lefties, significantly worse reaction, but slightly better fielding. But of course they’re going to pretend this year was better than his 2015 season and boost every single attribute out the [censored]. If I were someone that cared about puckett, bagwell, etc., then SDS making a pointless 99 like this is something I’d be furious over. If any at SDS actually cares about stats, they should be ashamed of themselves for even suggesting that Harper’s 2021 season was anywhere close to his 2015 season. I would be with you if this card was a reward for something or part of a program. However, it's a gift, you literally don't have to do anything to earn it. Stop complaining. Don't use it if you don't like it.
@jogger171717_psn said in Finest Harper:
@the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper: @mrad2010_xbl said in Finest Harper: @the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper: I don't like the idea of 2 99 cards, I just don't. And this card will be better than the other one despite 2015 Harper being better than 2021 Harper I mean how can SDS predict Harper would be the MVP this season. He earned MVP before and they released a card for him. He got MVP again so they’re giving him a Finest, Seems only right to me. I don’t see why it’s a problem unless you don’t like Harper. I mean Abreu didn't get a finest card last year. Trout got a Signature series and not a finest in 19(The current finest Trout is completely made up.) the only thing likely to separate finest Harper from award harper is Power vs L, Fielding, and Quirks. Its just a waste when people are still waiting on Puckett etc. And to be clear, I don't hate Harper, far from it. I just thinks that tgis further proves that cards based on the current season are far too juiced. 2015 Harper is arguably the best non-Bonds hitting season of the past 25 years. Legends and non-current season flashbacks deserve more than what they get Harper is easily one of my favorite players, but giving him two 99s is absolutely one of the dumbest things SDS has ever done content-wise. The only way it’ll make sense is if the finest has significantly worse attributes against lefties, significantly worse reaction, but slightly better fielding. But of course they’re going to pretend this year was better than his 2015 season and boost every single attribute out the [censored]. If I were someone that cared about puckett, bagwell, etc., then SDS making a pointless 99 like this is something I’d be furious over. If any at SDS actually cares about stats, they should be ashamed of themselves for even suggesting that Harper’s 2021 season was anywhere close to his 2015 season.
@mrad2010_xbl said in Finest Harper: @the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper: I don't like the idea of 2 99 cards, I just don't. And this card will be better than the other one despite 2015 Harper being better than 2021 Harper I mean how can SDS predict Harper would be the MVP this season. He earned MVP before and they released a card for him. He got MVP again so they’re giving him a Finest, Seems only right to me. I don’t see why it’s a problem unless you don’t like Harper. I mean Abreu didn't get a finest card last year. Trout got a Signature series and not a finest in 19(The current finest Trout is completely made up.) the only thing likely to separate finest Harper from award harper is Power vs L, Fielding, and Quirks. Its just a waste when people are still waiting on Puckett etc. And to be clear, I don't hate Harper, far from it. I just thinks that tgis further proves that cards based on the current season are far too juiced. 2015 Harper is arguably the best non-Bonds hitting season of the past 25 years. Legends and non-current season flashbacks deserve more than what they get
@mrad2010_xbl said in Finest Harper:
@the_dragon1912 said in Finest Harper: I don't like the idea of 2 99 cards, I just don't. And this card will be better than the other one despite 2015 Harper being better than 2021 Harper I mean how can SDS predict Harper would be the MVP this season. He earned MVP before and they released a card for him. He got MVP again so they’re giving him a Finest, Seems only right to me. I don’t see why it’s a problem unless you don’t like Harper.
I don't like the idea of 2 99 cards, I just don't. And this card will be better than the other one despite 2015 Harper being better than 2021 Harper
I mean how can SDS predict Harper would be the MVP this season. He earned MVP before and they released a card for him. He got MVP again so they’re giving him a Finest, Seems only right to me. I don’t see why it’s a problem unless you don’t like Harper.
I mean Abreu didn't get a finest card last year. Trout got a Signature series and not a finest in 19(The current finest Trout is completely made up.) the only thing likely to separate finest Harper from award harper is Power vs L, Fielding, and Quirks. Its just a waste when people are still waiting on Puckett etc.
And to be clear, I don't hate Harper, far from it. I just thinks that tgis further proves that cards based on the current season are far too juiced. 2015 Harper is arguably the best non-Bonds hitting season of the past 25 years. Legends and non-current season flashbacks deserve more than what they get
Harper is easily one of my favorite players, but giving him two 99s is absolutely one of the dumbest things SDS has ever done content-wise. The only way it’ll make sense is if the finest has significantly worse attributes against lefties, significantly worse reaction, but slightly better fielding. But of course they’re going to pretend this year was better than his 2015 season and boost every single attribute out the [censored].
If I were someone that cared about puckett, bagwell, etc., then SDS making a pointless 99 like this is something I’d be furious over.
If any at SDS actually cares about stats, they should be ashamed of themselves for even suggesting that Harper’s 2021 season was anywhere close to his 2015 season.
I would be with you if this card was a reward for something or part of a program. However, it's a gift, you literally don't have to do anything to earn it. Stop complaining. Don't use it if you don't like it.
You know what would have been a better gift? Kirby Puckett. Or literally any other card that didn't have a 99. I would have even accepted a no-hitter card for some of those guys that threw one so early in the season their topps nows are under 90. A Harper card that is marginally better, even with a worse season than 2015 Harper, is stupid. It just seems like fan service for the Phillies fans that have been crying about a Phillies 99 Harper for 3 years
You know what? You're right, they could've given us a better gift. They could've given us a player who doesn't have a 99 yet. You know what they didn't have to do? Give us a gift at all. I don't have the MVP Harper so I'm looking forward to using this one. People will find a way to complain about anything nowadays lol.
@a761506_psn said in Which cards get values decimated with 11th inning?:
You’d sell if you thought the price would drop so you can complete collections… for instance, Griffey… anyone who has Griffey likely spent real money to get him. We all play the same game here, some of those collections cost a fortune to get there, and you need all but one completed to get Griffey. I’d like to use his card, I refuse to spend real money, so I’ll sell off some high dollar cards on the hopes prices drop and I can finish that collection.
You don't need to spend real money to get Griffey. I haven't spent a dime on stubs, I don't flip cards or use the market or really do anything to get stubs except play the game and occasionally sell a high value card, and I've completed all the collections and got Griffey earlier this week. If you've been playing all year he's really not hard to obtain.
I've been playing semi casually for a number of years, always enjoyed the game. This year I've put more effort into ranked seasons. I'm pretty decent, managed to end up with a very solid record in just over 60 games so far. I was enjoying it until I got to the 700s+. Hitting becomes Frustratingly difficult. Pitching completely dominates 90% of the games. I've managed to keep winning more than I lose but it's become incredibly sweaty and boring. 3-2 games with 16 strikeouts a side gets stale real quick.
I wish they would do something like maybe make pitching more difficult as your rating goes up, not the other way around. Like make it more difficult to locate or something, cause every pitch is an absolute dot.
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in RS becoming a slog:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in RS becoming a slog: I've been playing semi casually for a number of years, always enjoyed the game. This year I've put more effort into ranked seasons. I'm pretty decent, managed to end up with a very solid record in just over 60 games so far. I was enjoying it until I got to the 700s+. Hitting becomes Frustratingly difficult. Pitching completely dominates 90% of the games. I've managed to keep winning more than I lose but it's become incredibly sweaty and boring. 3-2 games with 16 strikeouts a side gets stale real quick. I wish they would do something like maybe make pitching more difficult as your rating goes up, not the other way around. Like make it more difficult to locate or something, cause every pitch is an absolute dot. You were enjoying all star because it is a slug fest with the pci being enormous.
@sauciestburrito_psn said in RS becoming a slog:
I've been playing semi casually for a number of years, always enjoyed the game. This year I've put more effort into ranked seasons. I'm pretty decent, managed to end up with a very solid record in just over 60 games so far. I was enjoying it until I got to the 700s+. Hitting becomes Frustratingly difficult. Pitching completely dominates 90% of the games. I've managed to keep winning more than I lose but it's become incredibly sweaty and boring. 3-2 games with 16 strikeouts a side gets stale real quick. I wish they would do something like maybe make pitching more difficult as your rating goes up, not the other way around. Like make it more difficult to locate or something, cause every pitch is an absolute dot.
You were enjoying all star because it is a slug fest with the pci being enormous.
Yes... That's my point, slugfests are way more fun than constant pitcher's duels
I have absolutely no problem with daily moments being as easy as humanly possible. The more moments you can spend 2 minutes or less on the better.
@schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing:
@mike__honcho_361 said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @mike__honcho_361 said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all. Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before. We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can. Look man, you came at me saying I suck. Truth is I just went on a 27-3 run to make WS for Trout, didn't have to tank a thing. I played good players instead of dodging them and in the meantime I ended up batting well over .300 which would've been closer to .400 if not for all the dashboards during my homeruns. So I don't think you want this smoke, stick to your offline play before bed. Oh, I so envy you because you're a WS player. I wish I could be as cool as you. /s I was just pointing out how hilarious it is for someone like you to tell someone like me "you suck". You were all to eager throwing out numbers and records and god knows what, so I figured I'd do the same. Almost in the same breath you tell someone they suck and then say that you tanked games so you can avoid playing vs good players lol. Can’t even make this stuff up. Also almost every post I’ve seen from him has been complaint posts(ie the crying he’s talking about). Ironic Wait you're saying this to him right, not me? I'm confused because you quoted me. But yeah if you did mean him then I agree, he's a bit weird. Yea him. You guys are freaking morons. Both blocked so I don't have to ever deal with you little cry babies again. Cry me a river. You lost a game. Waaaaaaaaa
@mike__honcho_361 said in Polo grounds contact swing:
@raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @mike__honcho_361 said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all. Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before. We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can. Look man, you came at me saying I suck. Truth is I just went on a 27-3 run to make WS for Trout, didn't have to tank a thing. I played good players instead of dodging them and in the meantime I ended up batting well over .300 which would've been closer to .400 if not for all the dashboards during my homeruns. So I don't think you want this smoke, stick to your offline play before bed. Oh, I so envy you because you're a WS player. I wish I could be as cool as you. /s I was just pointing out how hilarious it is for someone like you to tell someone like me "you suck". You were all to eager throwing out numbers and records and god knows what, so I figured I'd do the same. Almost in the same breath you tell someone they suck and then say that you tanked games so you can avoid playing vs good players lol. Can’t even make this stuff up. Also almost every post I’ve seen from him has been complaint posts(ie the crying he’s talking about). Ironic Wait you're saying this to him right, not me? I'm confused because you quoted me. But yeah if you did mean him then I agree, he's a bit weird. Yea him.
@raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing:
@mike__honcho_361 said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all. Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before. We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can. Look man, you came at me saying I suck. Truth is I just went on a 27-3 run to make WS for Trout, didn't have to tank a thing. I played good players instead of dodging them and in the meantime I ended up batting well over .300 which would've been closer to .400 if not for all the dashboards during my homeruns. So I don't think you want this smoke, stick to your offline play before bed. Oh, I so envy you because you're a WS player. I wish I could be as cool as you. /s I was just pointing out how hilarious it is for someone like you to tell someone like me "you suck". You were all to eager throwing out numbers and records and god knows what, so I figured I'd do the same. Almost in the same breath you tell someone they suck and then say that you tanked games so you can avoid playing vs good players lol. Can’t even make this stuff up. Also almost every post I’ve seen from him has been complaint posts(ie the crying he’s talking about). Ironic Wait you're saying this to him right, not me? I'm confused because you quoted me. But yeah if you did mean him then I agree, he's a bit weird.
@raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all. Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before. We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can. Look man, you came at me saying I suck. Truth is I just went on a 27-3 run to make WS for Trout, didn't have to tank a thing. I played good players instead of dodging them and in the meantime I ended up batting well over .300 which would've been closer to .400 if not for all the dashboards during my homeruns. So I don't think you want this smoke, stick to your offline play before bed. Oh, I so envy you because you're a WS player. I wish I could be as cool as you. /s I was just pointing out how hilarious it is for someone like you to tell someone like me "you suck". You were all to eager throwing out numbers and records and god knows what, so I figured I'd do the same. Almost in the same breath you tell someone they suck and then say that you tanked games so you can avoid playing vs good players lol. Can’t even make this stuff up. Also almost every post I’ve seen from him has been complaint posts(ie the crying he’s talking about). Ironic
@schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all. Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before. We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can. Look man, you came at me saying I suck. Truth is I just went on a 27-3 run to make WS for Trout, didn't have to tank a thing. I played good players instead of dodging them and in the meantime I ended up batting well over .300 which would've been closer to .400 if not for all the dashboards during my homeruns. So I don't think you want this smoke, stick to your offline play before bed. Oh, I so envy you because you're a WS player. I wish I could be as cool as you. /s I was just pointing out how hilarious it is for someone like you to tell someone like me "you suck". You were all to eager throwing out numbers and records and god knows what, so I figured I'd do the same.
@raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all. Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before. We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can. Look man, you came at me saying I suck. Truth is I just went on a 27-3 run to make WS for Trout, didn't have to tank a thing. I played good players instead of dodging them and in the meantime I ended up batting well over .300 which would've been closer to .400 if not for all the dashboards during my homeruns. So I don't think you want this smoke, stick to your offline play before bed. Oh, I so envy you because you're a WS player. I wish I could be as cool as you. /s
@schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all. Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before. We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can. Look man, you came at me saying I suck. Truth is I just went on a 27-3 run to make WS for Trout, didn't have to tank a thing. I played good players instead of dodging them and in the meantime I ended up batting well over .300 which would've been closer to .400 if not for all the dashboards during my homeruns. So I don't think you want this smoke, stick to your offline play before bed.
@raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all. Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before. We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can.
@schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want. Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all.
@raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right? Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records. I'm down for a friendly if you ever want.
@schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything. Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right?
@raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record. I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything.
@schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: @raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose. Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record.
@raesone_psn said in Polo grounds contact swing: @schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose.
@schwizzle_nizzle said in Polo grounds contact swing: Who cares? Cared enough to comment
Who cares?
Cared enough to comment
Care enough to get tired if people crying because they suck and lose.
Says the guy who's batting. 252 with a 44-29 record.
I tanked 25 wins to get Trout. I was 14-2 before trying. this game is so bad online and records don't mean anything.
Sure you were. 14-2 where the first 14 games were on Veteran and the 2 losses came once you hit All-Star difficulty. But hey I'm sure you weren't even trying, right?
Correct, I don't care. Just played online to get Trout. Never said I was a HOF or Legend player. Highest rating was 635 but tanked to 400-450 for the easy wins. I cared last year with my 80-29 record, or something similar, but learned this game is trash and not worth the time caring about fake records.
I'm down for a friendly if you ever want.
Friendly huh? That's ironic, since you haven't been very friendly at all.
Agreed. I dislike cry babies as I said before.
We can play an unfriendly then. I'll try and be as toxic as I can.
Look man, you came at me saying I suck. Truth is I just went on a 27-3 run to make WS for Trout, didn't have to tank a thing. I played good players instead of dodging them and in the meantime I ended up batting well over .300 which would've been closer to .400 if not for all the dashboards during my homeruns. So I don't think you want this smoke, stick to your offline play before bed.
Oh, I so envy you because you're a WS player. I wish I could be as cool as you. /s
I was just pointing out how hilarious it is for someone like you to tell someone like me "you suck". You were all to eager throwing out numbers and records and god knows what, so I figured I'd do the same.
Almost in the same breath you tell someone they suck and then say that you tanked games so you can avoid playing vs good players lol. Can’t even make this stuff up.
Also almost every post I’ve seen from him has been complaint posts(ie the crying he’s talking about). Ironic
Wait you're saying this to him right, not me? I'm confused because you quoted me. But yeah if you did mean him then I agree, he's a bit weird.
Yea him.
You guys are freaking morons. Both blocked so I don't have to ever deal with you little cry babies again. Cry me a river. You lost a game. Waaaaaaaaa
Lol the only person crying about anything on this thread is you my dude. Why you so angry?
Huge W, I love it. Anybody that complains about a free 99 that you get literally just by logging in is just a whiner.
@michaelnight22_psn said in Ban Zone hitting on DD.:
Zone hitting is essentially guess pitch. It's becoming corny AF. Unrealistic. It should be banned from Diamond Dynasty in my opinion. Directional hitting is more realistic but it stops working once you get in the 700 hundreds in level rank or whatever... every hitting style should be equal. Zone hitting is more dominant style and I think that's not right in my opinion. I've used Directional hitting since the first mlb the show and now I have to change my style because it just doesn't work as well as Zone AKA Guess pitch... in a way... I'm 37 years old I shouldn't have to change the way I play.... SMH. Let us use custom batting veiws in DD... Come on man. Equality please.
Directional hitting is lame and requires no skill. If you don't like zone it's probably cause you suck
I'd 100% rather have a universal DH, in this game and real life. Give me that extra slot for a card that I actually want to hit with, it would give us so many more options to build a lineup. Watching the pitcher hit in real life is painful. Let a real hitter hit.
I don't really enjoy most moments in general, but let's be real, 95% of them are easy as sh!t. If you can't complete something, chances are it's because your not good at hitting. Every once in a while I'll have an at bat where the pitcher is wild, or the defense makes some spectacular diving play, but the way some people complain I'm thinking they must've gotten a different game than the one I have
I think the only way this will be even remotely enjoyable is if you play with friends. I only have one friend who might even consider getting the game next year, and he's not good lol. Matching up with 3-5 randoms would be an absolute hot mess. I'll probably stay away from this mode, but I suppose it has potential to be fun if you have friends that play too.
@write-to-shawn_psn said in 2v2 and 3v3 Competitive Mode Confirmed:
I think playing against trolls will be more entertaining now with a buddy on my side. I’m all for this co-op. It may fail, but I like that it’s starting somewhere and happy to give it a chance.
That may be true, but just imagine how much dashboarding will happen in this mode. If you thought people were quick to leave when they were the one controlling what's happening, imagine how fast they'll leave when their teammate gives up a Homer, or has a 1 2 3 inning at the plate. It'll end up being a 1v1 by the end lol.
Plus there's no way the servers will be able to handle 6 people at once when they can barely handle 2 right now lol. I really do hope that it turns out great, but it seems like SDS is getting in way over their heads with this mode.
Unless you're only playing with your friends, this seems like it will be pretty terrible lol. There's gonna be so many trolls and people screwing around, bad connections, lag, disconnects... They need dedicated servers before this even has a chance to go well.
It's risky to count on buy orders to get elite event rewards like Trea that late in the game cycle. That's why I grinded for him. I'm really glad I didn't sell him either lol.
I'm biased as an M's fan, but the 2001 Mariners have to be at the top of this list. Record wise best regular season ever and no WS to show for it.
@ustoopid2_mlbts said in Diamond Dynasty Co-op:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Diamond Dynasty Co-op: Maybe there could be a way to make it exciting but I'm just not sure how you could make MLB co-op fun for both people. Be able to assign a user to a player in the line up and the user controls that player in the field.
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Diamond Dynasty Co-op:
Maybe there could be a way to make it exciting but I'm just not sure how you could make MLB co-op fun for both people.
Be able to assign a user to a player in the line up and the user controls that player in the field.
That's essentially RTTS except you have to watch everybody else's at bats lol
@t00muchham_xbl said in Diamond Dynasty Co-op:
@sauciestburrito_psn said in Diamond Dynasty Co-op: Interesting concept. Personally I don't think I would like having somebody else control part of the game while I just sit there and watch. Sounds boring. Baseball isn't like football where everybody is doing something every play. If you're not controlling the pitcher or batter you're not doing anything. Maybe there could be a way to make it exciting but I'm just not sure how you could make MLB co-op fun for both people. I disagree - I played a lot of couch co-op in high school and college. I can only speak from own experience when I say that I want to be able to play WITH people and not just against them.
Interesting concept. Personally I don't think I would like having somebody else control part of the game while I just sit there and watch. Sounds boring. Baseball isn't like football where everybody is doing something every play. If you're not controlling the pitcher or batter you're not doing anything. Maybe there could be a way to make it exciting but I'm just not sure how you could make MLB co-op fun for both people.
Interesting concept. Personally I don't think I would like having somebody else control part of the game while I just sit there and watch. Sounds boring. Baseball isn't like football where everybody is doing something every play. If you're not controlling the pitcher or batter you're not doing anything.
I disagree - I played a lot of couch co-op in high school and college. I can only speak from own experience when I say that I want to be able to play WITH people and not just against them.
I love co-op too, I just don't think it would work in a baseball game. If you're playing on the same team then if you're not controlling the hitter or pitcher you're either just watching the game or standing in the field doing nothing. Doesn't sound super engaging to me.
I like the idea. I say punish dashboarders, if you disconnect while the ball is in the air you get -1 point.
Ketel Marte and Polanco have been raking on my godsquad and every other team I put them on since they came out. Those guys and Turner are my top 3 no question.