@eatyum_psn said in Well whaddya know:
@raesone_psn said in Well whaddya know:
@eatyum_psn said in Well whaddya know:
@raesone_psn said in Well whaddya know:
@eatyum_psn said in Well whaddya know:
@raesone_psn said in Well whaddya know:
I would be open to the argument that the pitch went through the zone if the timing on it was very early or even early. But it literally says good timing, and it's closer to the green than the yellow (hence it says good and not just early). That means that the pitch wasn't caught in the flight, the pitch was hit at the location where it ended up being.
I don't think that's true at all, just because it was good timing on the hitter side doesn't mean that's where the ball ends up being. It was still to far out for that to be true.
Doesn't the hitting feedback register the location of where contact is made? Since the timing was good, that spot is accurate to where the pitch would end up using that logic.
No, that's not how it works, just because it's a good time to hit the ball, doesn't mean that is the balls final destination. The ball doesn't magically stop moving if the hitter doesn't hit it there.
I think we're gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. I hear what you're saying, and like I argued before I would agree if the timing was early or very early. But since that wasn't the case here, I do think that the spot that the feedback shows was in fact the location where the pitch would've ended up being if the batter had not swung.
But why? what gives you this assumption? Because using the hitters timing isn't proof, unless you are suggesting the hitters good time to swing is when the ball was in the glove, or that the ball magically stops moving on a slurve before it gets in the glove.
Besides, all of this is moot because we know where the ball would have ended up. https://twitter.com/UHeynaBoutIt/status/1523725235706421250?s=20&t=qwWX3od9aqqy9oadx6-SDQ
Which is outside the par, but the picture makes it look worse then it is, as my first comment said
I’m of the same opinion of Raes; if they use this feedback for balls and strikes, why wouldn’t they use it foe swing feedback? It’s one of the reasons I believe people make too much of the PCI feedback: the ball is where it would have crossed the plate; the PCI is either where the bat crossed or made contact; either way, it never shows both the ball and the PCI at the point of contact. There would still be BS hits, but less severe impression of getting screwed by the engine.