Been thinking about it, not sure if someone else has mentioned it. But maybe next year when playing Ranked or Ranked Coop can it just be +30 points per win and when you lose -15 points.
This might keep more people engaged and not as enraged by losing one game. Sometimes you barely scratch a win and the next your fielders make unnecessary errors for no reason. I still hit 1000 rated this year but man does it frustrate me when I win and the rating is 796 or 899.
So if we can have more consistency in the ratings, when you lose 2 games at least you’re back to where you started.
Anyways. Just a thought.
JUST-_-UNR34L_PSN
Posts
-
-
Feels like you have to go off by the one you’re the lowest in to be on the safe side. That’s a shame.
-
It’s very frustrating when it seems like the leaderboard changes every time you click on it. Not because of the players playing their game but like a rotating leaderboard or something.
One of them I’m in first place, the next one I’m fifth. Wish there was more clarity so I don’t miss out of the reward, other than keep playing till it’s absurd. Am I the only one? -
@highvolt29_mlbts said in Food for thought on Parallels:
I just wish the level of parallel changed the color of the background diamonds on ls cards. Like how prestiged cards last year turned red. This year it’s just kinda a bleh refractor. I’d like to see the card decked in that tier 5 refractor
Your idea is great! I always thought about diamonds should be the color of the team too. Like As Chapman being Green diamonds, or Red Sox’s being Red diamond backgrounds.
-
Clearly I’m the only feeling this way lol.
-
@djeternal2_psn said in Food for thought on Parallels:
I'm curious why it bothers you so much
Idk why the bottom right numbers bother me after 10k lol. I really do like Parallels, way more than Prestige last year.
-
Maybe I’m being misunderstood, when I mean capping, I’m not saying everyone doesn’t get the parallels. I mean the numbers beside it, after 10k it should just be generic green, orange, etc.
-
Maybe it’s just me, but I would like to see a cap on the number you see on the Parallels Cards to like 1000 or 10,000. Like it’s ok if 10k players were the first to get the card paralleled at a certain stage, but it slightly bothers me to see a card be 101k/132k as an example. At that point just leave it at the colors. Hopefully someone agrees. Letting the Number be a reward for the grind is more meaningful in my opinion.
Rating System 2027 Idea
WC Leaderboard
WC Leaderboard
Food for thought on Parallels
Food for thought on Parallels
Food for thought on Parallels
Food for thought on Parallels
Food for thought on Parallels