Community Forum

@x814xmafia_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@x814xmafia_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@x814xmafia_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?

Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.

But what about all the times you are beating clearly superior opponents? If what you claim is true, that there is no skill involved, surely this would have been an issue for you too?

Most of the time the better opponent wins, does that disqualify all the times I’ve been gifted opportunities? No. I look at as when 2 good teams play each other in real life, you’re more likely to see a 2-1 series more than a sweep. And if a sweep happens tip your cap. It can go either way against good players, but in no universe should a really bad player get more opportunities then someone who is outplaying them 10 fold.

So you say that if two good players match up; the better player of the two will win.

But then you state that skill doesn't matter.

So how did the better player win?

I’m just gonna do what you just did and ignore what you typed. Always the offline players that try to debate yet don’t play the game online.

So youre deflecting the question by assuming I don't kniw what I'm talking about because you looked up my profile and noticed that my Ranked Recorde is 0-0. So I must not play online.

Thanks for assuming that.

Guess you didn't take into consideration that my U.P. doesn't show the games I played in BR or in Events.

Guess you didnt take into consideration that any games played in Weekend Classic dont go against your Ranked record.

And I guess you didnt take into consideration that I may have a secondary account where I play my Ranked games.

So, after stating all that, are you going to answer my question?

Or will you come up with another excuse, or way, to deflect the question?

Then it should be no problem to post your stats? And we’re talking online stats btw.

What does me posting my online stats have to do with answering my question?

I asked if two good players match up, and skill doesn't matter, how does one win and the other lose?

That has absolutely NOTHING to do with my online stats.

Again, keep deflecting the question.

You just deflected my question… makes sense why you did.

@Talkingben9558_XBL said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN
No you dont. I looked you up and your best season is 785

I literally have the icon and banner you’re gonna be real salty when it shows up. Actually made it twice when looking in my inventory. Look me up now and find out it’s there lol

@TheBigPapa55_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

When you inflate your skill level way higher than it actually is you start to get a bit delusional.
This usually leads to an inability to take a loss, which is quite evident here.

I just peeped your stats, that .753 ops is hall of fame worthy, I’m so cheesed

@TheBigPapa55_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

When you inflate your skill level way higher than it actually is you start to get a bit delusional.
This usually leads to an inability to take a loss, which is quite evident here.

Oh no it’s TheBigPapa55, did I get banned for replying and typing your name lol. Bro has the inability to read the code of conduct.

@LIONED-33_XBL said in Another game of dominating opponent:

I play online, and as frustrating it is, just when 2 good teams play each other in real life it could go either way. Sometimes bad teams win. Thats baseball. Because you can't compete doesnt mean the game cheated you, just means you're not as good as you think. When you lose take a moment before coming on the boards and posting. Losing happens. Good players lose to people they have no business losing too, and bad players like yourself lose too. More often than not.

Man I know you felt good typing that in the back of a Applebees kitchen making wings.

@Talkingben9558_XBL

lol that’s funny because I have made World Series this year lol, I literally have the banner and icon some of yall really just talk and don’t look into anything

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

It seems like the OP matches up with players far inferior to him, but then you seem to imply the reverse never happens. If you beat a better opponent its 'oh we are both good, its baseball'

which is where i go back to my statement that you probably aren't as good as you think you are. Especially if you are at a low enough rank that these supposedly terrible players are matched up with you.

No one seems to be denying that the RNG component is heavier this year than past years, but you make it sound like a legit bronze II player beating a 800+ ranked player is a common thing.

And again I reference you being an offline player, because users who make that assumption are usually not privy to how the game can play.

I also like how you glossed over where if I lose to a good player too, because that happens. A few rng plays or swings can sway the game, but rarely does a “good player” strike out 16 times and gets a majority of hits on late swings or balls in the dirt.

@x814xmafia_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@x814xmafia_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?

Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.

But what about all the times you are beating clearly superior opponents? If what you claim is true, that there is no skill involved, surely this would have been an issue for you too?

Most of the time the better opponent wins, does that disqualify all the times I’ve been gifted opportunities? No. I look at as when 2 good teams play each other in real life, you’re more likely to see a 2-1 series more than a sweep. And if a sweep happens tip your cap. It can go either way against good players, but in no universe should a really bad player get more opportunities then someone who is outplaying them 10 fold.

So you say that if two good players match up; the better player of the two will win.

But then you state that skill doesn't matter.

So how did the better player win?

I’m just gonna do what you just did and ignore what you typed. Always the offline players that try to debate yet don’t play the game online.

So youre deflecting the question by assuming I don't kniw what I'm talking about because you looked up my profile and noticed that my Ranked Recorde is 0-0. So I must not play online.

Thanks for assuming that.

Guess you didn't take into consideration that my U.P. doesn't show the games I played in BR or in Events.

Guess you didnt take into consideration that any games played in Weekend Classic dont go against your Ranked record.

And I guess you didnt take into consideration that I may have a secondary account where I play my Ranked games.

So, after stating all that, are you going to answer my question?

Or will you come up with another excuse, or way, to deflect the question?

Then it should be no problem to post your stats? And we’re talking online stats btw.

@x814xmafia_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?

Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.

But what about all the times you are beating clearly superior opponents? If what you claim is true, that there is no skill involved, surely this would have been an issue for you too?

Most of the time the better opponent wins, does that disqualify all the times I’ve been gifted opportunities? No. I look at as when 2 good teams play each other in real life, you’re more likely to see a 2-1 series more than a sweep. And if a sweep happens tip your cap. It can go either way against good players, but in no universe should a really bad player get more opportunities then someone who is outplaying them 10 fold.

So you say that if two good players match up; the better player of the two will win.

But then you state that skill doesn't matter.

So how did the better player win?

I’m just gonna do what you just did and ignore what you typed. Always the offline players that try to debate yet don’t play the game online.

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Chrono_Omega_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?

Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.

But what about all the times you are beating clearly superior opponents? If what you claim is true, that there is no skill involved, surely this would have been an issue for you too?

Most of the time the better opponent wins, does that disqualify all the times I’ve been gifted opportunities? No. I look at as when 2 good teams play each other in real life, you’re more likely to see a 2-1 series more than a sweep. And if a sweep happens tip your cap. It can go either way against good players, but in no universe should a really bad player get more opportunities then someone who is outplaying them 10 fold.

@sbchamps17_NSW

And then right after, it’s says suspect of cheating. Please read it again. Because technically replying to you I have your user id in my response.

@Teak2112_MLBTS said in Another game of dominating opponent:

You likely aren't as good as you think you are.
Also, why didnt you voice concerns after the games you won vs better opponents if this is such an epidemic?

Opinions from non online players is always intriguing. I don’t voice opinions against better opponents because I can see they are good, there’s no issue losing to someone who actually played great instead of someone who struck out 16 times and got majority of their runs via flukes.

“Post any IDs or any other information of players you suspect to be cheating. You can report them to theshow.com/support. Please include any additional information you may have.”

Do you guys genuinely don’t read and it shows. There’s never anything in the code of conduct stating praise of past users. Please read everyone.

@TheBigPapa55_PSN said in Another game of dominating opponent:

Might want to delete the users you called out. Kinda against the forum rules.

I’m not breaking any rules, there’s nothing in the forum by praising other users. There is if you suggest cheating or other negative connotations. Technically speaking you break it by dabbling in a toxic post which most people would assume is toxic, depends on how you classify it.

Struck this [censored] out 16 times and he only struck me out 4 and I had better contact all game. SDS was really tired of people like [REDACTED] and the other old goats spanking these crusty dudes. That they had to reconfigure the whole game to make it even. Skill does not matter at all.

Just to lose on a bunch flukes and error. Had the bases loaded and smashed a 106 mph ball of the bat infield in for a double play. Records don’t mean anything in this game when you can lose to an absolute scrub.

It’s still insane a good timed swing inner pci is a pop up, yeah I saw the ball all the way and hit it for a pop up when I wasn’t under it. Game blows hard dih

Hitting and pitching suck. I can throw perfect pitches for them to hover in the middle.

Or you get a bunch of good times swings go for 96-102 mph lasers that people catch, only for your opponent to get the same swings rewarded. This game has a handicap or something because it’s mind boggling how much better I play and still lose.

You can get early and late timing and get more hits than a good timed swing. That has been this game for me