@broken_toy1 said in Sponsorship Money Not Adding into Budget:
@fubar2k7 said in Sponsorship Money Not Adding into Budget:
@broken_toy1 said in Sponsorship Money Not Adding into Budget:
@fubar2k7 said in Sponsorship Money Not Adding into Budget:
@Bound2Fail77
When you add the 3 red numbers (revenue share, player and staff salaries) you are paying $226.2 million which is above the 2021 threshold of $216 million so even though you are below budget you’re losing money.
The calculation of available budget is your player and staff salaries subtracted off your budget without including what you pay into revenue share. Your player and staff are below your budget but the revenue share you pay make it where you are losing money without the sponsorship money you’re making. Does that make sense?
I thought that future budget was entirely based on current, end of season, revenue minus expenditures. With the budget not changing until the next season. Making any new revenue moot until the next season. I'm wrong so often, it wouldn't surprise me to be wrong again.
Future budget is what you said or I believe it is what you said and how you perform in the post season factors as well.
The new revenue gained through sponsorship helps offset when you’re running at a loss like he is. If he doesn’t get the stolen bases he will start losing money (right now from what he said I assume his projected yearly deficit improves by $200k daily thanks to the stolen bases) and start getting notices about being in debt. Enough notices and it’ll lower his budget for the next season.
My girlfriend’s son ran a Mets franchise and had to trade Verlander due to being in debt once it threatened to lower his budget.
Thank you brother. Helpful as always.
My pleasure. Anything for my franchise pals.