Opponent rating
-
@QNEEK said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@QNEEK said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@QNEEK said in Opponent rating:
Fill me in please. Where did you see the level in the past? I've never noticed. The only way I could tell that we matched up HOF was the pci size.
Way back in the day you used to be able to see records/batting average/rating on guys universal profiles on the site and then they started taking stuff away, last year you could only see rating, now you can’t see anything
I gotcha. I remember seeing people's profiles, just never applied it to anybody I was currently matched up with. The only time I use this site is when i'm away from the game.
Same is true for him. He doesn't use it in game. He uses it so he can put down people who have a different opinion. His favorite tool is now gone so he can't put down your opinion as easily. He has to argue on his own merits. And when he can't...well...in my case he ignored me. Probably for the better.
[censored]... He hurt you bro? Lol
The funny thing is that I know he doesn't have me on ignore. But I will play along. I am happy to. When I was reversing the participation trophy stuff and applying it to his real life I sort of felt bad. But them my hysterical laughter at it made it feel better. There is something about that level of undeserved arrogance that bothers me. But its cool because I think I set him straight.
-
I don't know what's more cringe
Him thinking people should be able to make WS playing on Veteran.
Or
Him thinking he "owned" anyone in this thread.
Yikes. Thanks for the laughs though.
-
@thizzlyadams said in Opponent rating:
I don't know what's more cringe
Him thinking people should be able to make WS playing on Veteran.
Or
Him thinking he "owned" anyone in this thread.
Yikes. Thanks for the laughs though.
First off. I am saying peeps should be able to make WS in multiple ways that allow them to enjoy the game and also compete. No different than how some make it using zone, zone analog or timed only
Secondly, My God...I normally thinking owning someone on a website is pathetic. But dude was coming at me about participation trophies and now I have him rethinking is career. Its embarrassing and admittedly cringe worthy...but you can't possibly say that despite his attempts to try to insult he ended up getting the worst end of the stick. I gave his entire career a participation trophy. [censored] son.
-
@thizzlyadams said in Opponent rating:
I don't know what's more cringe
Him thinking people should be able to make WS playing on Veteran.
Or
Him thinking he "owned" anyone in this thread.
Yikes. Thanks for the laughs though.
Pretty much par for the course for ol mav
-
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@Harryhukari33 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@Harryhukari33 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@maskedgrappler said in Opponent rating:
The game should just have a matchmaking option that says I want to play on "this" difficulty. Period. Shouldn't be that hard.
I agree. You should be able to make WS playing on any difficulty and match make based on difficulty chosen independent of difficulty. In this way, you can play at whatever difficulty is more fun. Maybe with the ability to earn more points with a higher difficulty win. If it’s about competition it won’t matter the difficulty as long as it is the same as the opponent and equal playing ground.
You should be able to make it to world series only playing on veteran? Bad take..
Yes, because it makes it more accessible to more people and you will be playing on veteran vs a higher caliber player AND playing on veteran won’t yield as many pts in a win so it will take longer.
I bet you’ve never played competitive sports in your life. This is an awful take. Ranked season is a competitive format. It’s accessible to everyone who makes their way up.
This thought process makes me cringe.
Actually i have. At a very elite level. That might be why I don’t have the need to demonstrate my specialness via a video game. In real sports you don’t change entire rules as you move up. Do we make the mind closer. No. Not to mention this just a simulation
This isn’t about proving specialness at all. I could care less what people think about myself as a player. I want to play a game that is challenging and rewards good input, while also being competitive.
If you don’t mind me asking, what do you define as an “elite level”? I’m genuinely curious because your thoughts align with someone who believes in participation trophies.
Elite level in my case is beating Olympians in practice and almost Olympians in completion. But to me elite is what you make of it. If someone says they are elite...ok cool you are elite.
I agree with
I don’t think that I or anyone should dictate what your gaming experience is. If you like the highest difficulty setting go for it. I just don’t think anyone should dictate to me. All completion is fair as long as the same setting is applied to all parties.What Olympic type events did you participate in? Just genuinely curious.
We all have different opinions on gameplay. I don’t find your approach to be efficient, and I don’t think the rewards that are obtainable should be accessible to people who just play on easier difficulties. There should be challenges, you should lose games.
The ranked seasons format isn’t catered to elites. It’s widely accessible to those people who take on the challenge of making the push. They can decide for themselves if it’s worth it. If not, there are plenty of other modes to play!
-
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
Any word on this coming back?
Nobody wants try hards with no life attacking casuals .
-
@WorstVikingEver said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
Any word on this coming back?
Nobody wants try hards with no life attacking casuals .
Relax, there have been plenty of other options brought up to work around having the ratings on the website, have ratings show at the beginning of the game instead of record etc.
If someone wanted to look up your record, it not being on the website wouldn't stop them.
-
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
Go back to letting us see our opponents ratings on this website, the game plays so different on HOF and All star we need to know what level we're playing on, this was a dumb feature to take away because some low level players got upset when people would search up their ratings.
Did not know this was taken away, I am a low level player the last two year highest I got last year was DS and highest so far this year is PR. I play for fun. I do not care if someone knows my rating. I am not afraid if I get killed by someone better than me. If I am losing by 4 or more I will usually just quit. I never look up a players rating.
-
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@maskedgrappler said in Opponent rating:
@THE_Tomdawg69er said in Opponent rating:
@boduke82 said in Opponent rating:
Why? So elitist blowhards like you can judge everyone’s opinions?
No, so people can play on the difficulty they want instead of going between all star and hof. Sounds like you’re the blowhards
You'd still have to play though. But at least you would know what difficulty it was on.
It should be brought back or at least give the difficulty on the loading screen.
Nah, if I see all star I'm asking for a friendly quit.
This low level Player will accept Friendly quits before game starts.
-
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@mitchhammond24 said in Opponent rating:
I’d love to see them bring record and stats back to tsn as well, but I’m sure that won’t happen
It needs to come back
I love that this bothers you and the little cult of condescending elitist who think the opinion only matters for of those who meet your narrow criteria and play the game only in the way that you think is valid.
Oooops all opinions are equal now. Sorry
We just want to know what level we’re playing on in ranked seasons, nothing more nothing less, stop making a Mountain out of a mole hill because you want to argue
I am not arguing. I am expressing enjoyment. I do wonder if you are a mark for your own gimmick in thinking that you are not using it to make certain voices invalid or do you realize what you and your buddies do so frequently
I love how you say “we”
Why does the we really matter, why do you care if someone can see your Rating, I suck at hitting but can hold my own with pitching, if someone wants to bash me over a video game they have no life or no respect. I will just laugh at them. In return if someone is good at the game, sometimes I would want to know any thing that can help me but you will not get that with no respect. I would rather not play anyone on the 700 rating if I do not have to until I get to that level. It works good for all
-
@Harryhukari33 said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@mitchhammond24 said in Opponent rating:
I’d love to see them bring record and stats back to tsn as well, but I’m sure that won’t happen
It needs to come back
I love that this bothers you and the little cult of condescending elitist who think the opinion only matters for of those who meet your narrow criteria and play the game only in the way that you think is valid.
Oooops all opinions are equal now. Sorry
We just want to know what level we’re playing on in ranked seasons, nothing more nothing less, stop making a Mountain out of a mole hill because you want to argue
I am not arguing. I am expressing enjoyment. I do wonder if you are a mark for your own gimmick in thinking that you are not using it to make certain voices invalid or do you realize what you and your buddies do so frequently
I love how you say “we”
I think there's enough people on this thread that would like the same thing to be able to say "we"
“Raises hand”. It’s useful information. I mean if SDS prides itself on being realistic, why shouldn’t we have a “scouting report” to know who we’re playing?
I suck at hitting and I am in the we I do not need to play someone who is at 700 unless I get to 700
-
@REDSMAN09 said in Opponent rating:
@coastereight said in Opponent rating:
@The_Yankee_Jedi said in Opponent rating:
I see both sides...It would be nice to know what difficulty you’re playing on from the first pitch. That being said anytime anybody would give their opinion on here there would immediately be 5 people saying “You’re only 60-45 and in WC, Nobody cares what you think.” Then that would lead to fights. That’s the problem.
Yeah but isn't that valid? I'm WS level and it's hard for me to know whose opinions to value because you have people saying, "this card rakes" and you don't know if they're grinding conquest on rookie or playing 1100 level unless they tell you.
I agree to an extent. You obviously don’t want to take the opinions of people who have yet to touch HOF difficulty. But at this point the way the game plays I think records are really misleading. I’m struggling to make it out of wild card right now but all last year I was a CS player and made World Series a few times. My win percentage is not even close to what it usually is right now. I think all star difficulty is way too easy to hit. I’ve outhit my opponent in almost every single game I’ve played on all star yet this ranked season I’m only 2 games above .500 with every game being 11-10 or something ridiculous.
I can not hit but I can pitch, If I could hit as good as I pitch in this game I would be up in the higher ranks.
-
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@aaronjw76 said in Opponent rating:
@JBD847 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@maskedgrappler said in Opponent rating:
The game should just have a matchmaking option that says I want to play on "this" difficulty. Period. Shouldn't be that hard.
I agree. You should be able to make WS playing on any difficulty and match make based on difficulty chosen independent of difficulty. In this way, you can play at whatever difficulty is more fun. Maybe with the ability to earn more points with a higher difficulty win. If it’s about competition it won’t matter the difficulty as long as it is the same as the opponent and equal playing ground.
Why do you think this? Remember World Series is supposed to be for
The best players not to cater to you casuals who think everything should be given to youI not a casual but I am average and do not believe everything should be handed to anyone.
That said, people like you need to get off your high horse thinking your sh!t don't stink. It's the casuals and average who pay for this game to exist in the first place since they make up 90% of the user base. Keep trying to alienate that group and see what that does to this game.
Nothing is being handed. You have to beat an opponent at a harder level. Why should guys with monitors and sick internet be given WS because those advantages are real.
You still have to win. You can now have fun and play the game for enjoyment and competition
lot's of people have fun on hall of fame, it's not their fault you don't, I can't imagine saying you should be able to make it to the highest level of this game by playing on veteran lol
I am an average player cause I can pitch well, I can not hit worth a [censored], My ERA on AS is low 2.00 but my AVG is .202 last I checked. I do not think anyone should be rewarded on any level in RS playing on VET. AS and above, I do not care to waste time practicing hitting. I have never made WS. I am glad I can buy those cards off the market if I choose to. How can someone equal rewards playing on AS to HOF. There is a reason why players like Skepple and others make WS they are good, they put the time in to be good. Should I as a poor hitter get to make WS cause I am not as good. SDS should cater to me cause I have not learned how to time pitches or have the patience at the plate to take pitches. NOPE. I am ok with that. To me i do not care for my ranking I just want some of the cards and so I learned how to flip cards on the market and put my time in there. So much more to this game than just making WS.
-
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
@Jeviduty said in Opponent rating:
@skepple15 said in Opponent rating:
I love how this thread turned out, always good to get material for the MLBtheshow hot takes twitter feed, thank you!
This is pathetic dude. I can't believe ppl are even suggesting this. To play veteran all the way to WS? Wtf
Lol I know, didn't think it would turn out like this but glad it did
I noticed nobody gave a solid answer why not. This thread is exhibit A of how elitist dudes who are probably failing athletes have ruined this gaming community.
Sorry that not everybody is on board with your participation trophy attitude lol
so what’s your coaching record again? Are you fired or did you get a participation trophy?
It’s a video game that’s primary goal is to have fun. Why should I be forced to play on HOF to achieve WS because you are not winning enough in life. You are a walking participation trophy. Inclusivity is more fun imo. The game shouldn’t be built for a select few. If you want to show you are the best of the best. Create an online league and be about that life.
You are forced cause that is how SDS made it to. What is your problem. I am not good and who cares if they can see your ranking. If those high players want to judge me for not being able to hit well I can freakin pitch in every MLB the show started DD in 17 and my era has been low 2's playing on AS. in 2017 my ERA was under 2. We all know good pitching without hitting only gets you so far. If you want to make it to WS in this game and can not do it in RS go play MTO.
-
@Maverick31762 said in Opponent rating:
@taterracing said in Opponent rating:
Why isn't the rating next to the person's name on the opening screen? Have that and their record. That way there's no need to have to jump on TSN to try to find their rating -- keep it all in one place.
Because the entire system enabled disgusting behavior from people like Skepple. Plus its meaningless. For example last year and even this year. I would do Affinity innings with some crappy players just to rack up innings. I would take way more Ls than usual and my BA dips. Then I would switch to my Good team and all of sudden I am winning and I make WS.
People like Skepple would look at my record and by like he is horrible because a dude like him is so desperate to win that he couldn't conceive of the possibility dudes might not being playing to win every game.
Skepple wants to know what Rank you are at to know if he is playing on AS or HOF. Can't you comprehend what you read.
-
A admin locked this topic on
