Lesser of two evils
-
You HAVE to choose one.
What would you rather have back?
A. Sets & Seasons: Grinding cards only to lose them.
B. Immortals: The grind, and collecting of 'trinkets' to get them.
-
The immortals themselves weren't that bad, I actually liked them for a variety of reasons (most importantly, because they were REAL endgame cards with names that actually deserve 125 across the board. Nowadays every card gets their own "immortal 125 everything" at some point).
It was just the grind and the collectibles for the immortals that was a total pain, along with MLBTS 18 being widely considered the worst game in the franchise.
But yeah to answer the question, I'd take the immortals without a doubt.
-
@raesONE- said in Lesser or two evils:
The immortals themselves weren't that bad, I actually liked them for a variety of reasons (most importantly, because they were REAL endgame cards with names that actually deserve 125 across the board. Nowadays every card gets their own "immortal 125 everything" at some point).
It was just the grind and the collectibles for the immortals that was a total pain, along with MLBTS 18 being widely considered the worst game in the franchise.
But yeah to answer the question, I'd take the immortals without a doubt.
The grind is what I was trying to relay. Fixed my original post.
I'd also like them to go back to the old rankings (90-99s are Diamonds) and would like the get rid of the 125 rankings.
-
Give me sets and seasons all day, every day.
The Show 18 was the only time that I quit playing in May and never went back to it that year when I realized that I was never going to earn any of the immortals.
-
Sets and seasons
-
Immortals by a mile for the reasons @raesONE-_PSN laid out. Give me one long grind, not 6 long grinds. BUT... I understand where people didn't like Immortals. I play a lot, and others can't devote the same amount of time.
-
Lesser of two weevils
